>16 cores, Turbo up to 4.7GHz on ALL (meaning 100% stable 4.2 and 4.4 on ALL are GUARANTEED)
>12 cores, Turbo up to 5GHz
>8 cores, Turbo up to 5GHz
16 cores, Turbo up to 4.7GHz on ALL (meaning 100% stable 4.2 and 4.4 on ALL are GUARANTEED)
Other urls found in this thread:
images2.imagebam.com
twitter.com
costs: 6000 dollars
probably less than $500
>AMD
>Anything above 1500$
>Ever
You must be new here, Intoddler.
what about threadripper and radeon instinct
Gen1 Threadripper started at 1000$, roughly ~4 months later it got a price cut to 900$, nowadays it can be bought for ~700$ in some places. And that's for the TOP model.
Rest in peace fucking intel
I meant EPYC
Please tell me where you can get pic related for $700. I'm itching for a new cpu.
let's not get too excited tho, this is not really a legit source of information lads
3600X looks too good to be true desu and no I'm not shilling Intel here, I own an r5 2600
Top tier EPYC, even though expensive for normies, is still light ages below Inturd pricing-wise, WHILE owning golden and platinum Zionist turds in the ass nonstop. LOOK, JUST FUCKING LOOK AT 'DIS:
Learn to read and comprehend, Intbecile.
Will it run on my msi a320m grenade motherboard? And what ram should I get?
Zen 2 won't support lowest tier. You'd need a B 3xx board at the very minimum (B 4xx is a 100% guarantee).
Sucks. I hate to reinstall Windows.
It's only you yourself to blame for chimping out and giving into the "cheapest board is fine for AMD" meme. This is not AM 3 days anymore, matey.
So install Linux instead.
Plus extra latency due to chiplet and io chip abomination
if you're on win10 you don't have to reinstall it even if you are doing complete switch (like amd+amd to nvidia+intel or w/e).
shit just werks man
The inter-CCX and inter-core latency was already improved drastically in Zen+, and they've made even more improvements since then, you dumb fuck.
Nice cope there intcel
Found the cockroach thread. All you have to do is lift the fridge and voila. AMD drones scatter everywhere.
Daily reminder to buy AMD
instability and crashes on that
Impressive how those retarded vodka drinkers managed to fuck up a benchmark that hard.
They all seem to congregate to AMD shilled PCbuilding threads and poor threads, Their natural habitat includes trash filled bedrooms, Feeding from the government, And trying to justify their poorness all in one thread.
Try again.
I like AMD, but /pcbg/ has turned into an endless shitpost cpu war.
Nice memory gimp
>their poorness
Jude spotted.
Dunno, I've had the same win10 installed since mid2016, changed mobos 3 times, one of them was intel -> amd switch.
Never had any issues what so ever.
2933MHz is Zen+'s minimal spec, you Intbecile. And 2666MHz is Inturd's minimal spec for that CPoo.
Meant for .
Intel non-K chips can consistently reach their base clocks and boost clocks on a stock cooler. What kind of retard spends money on an upgraded cooler on a non OC chip?
Feels good to have 4000mhz ram and click X.M.P to have it actually work.
Zen can do that too, Intbecile. You're clearly missing on the whole point of test while you're damage controlling and coping in tears so hard.
Going to need proof on that. Memory controller explodes
Lol, Cope for what?
That Inturd poo is more expensive than Zen equivalent. You literally pay more for less.
If Zen 2 outperforms a 9900K in single core and overclocking ability, I'll buy it to. :)
I'm smiling so much my teeth are falling out
No prices confirmed for them? I'm looking forward to buy something for ~200€
It already was shown utterly OBLITERATING 9900K while consuming only HALF the wattage, you slowpoke fuck.
>Bias benchmark
>AMD
Here ya go. Obliterated.
Zen 2 will still be slower, I don't buy latency ridden shit.
total bullshit overhype under deliver same old AMD story
Here ya go, obliterated.
--> .
>Having to compare a 32 core with an 8 core while using R20. Ok i'll bite.
Kek, Wheres that single core score poorfag?
>One 32 core for 900$ beats two 30 core Zionist turds for 8000$ each, while also getting dangerously close to beating THE most expensive Inturd CPoo currently available on the market
>Intbecile is so buttmad about this that he doesn't even notice it's not even any EPYC, but a mere THREADRIPPER, kek
>power consumption
>Watts (more is better)
>price
> US Dollars (higher is better)
I forgot you guys are poor. I have no use for any of those chips nor do you. Beside, I don't want shit latency.
How the hell do you effectively dissipate 800w on such a small die?
>Ryzen is cooler. Pffffff
>Intbecile is SO BUTT-HURT out of his miserable dumb sorry ass, that he can't count 2+2 and "doesn't notice" the is for CPU alone while is for entire system
higher is better
checkmate
lol
>Higher TDP
>Almost trice the price
>Barely any increase in performance
LOL indeed.
|
|>
|
|
|
You pay a premium if you want the best poorfag. :)
>if you want best poorfag
But I don't want you anywhere near me, Intcel.
kek, btfo once again
>paying almost twice as much for a 10% performance increase
good goy
Yes, Intbeciles been BTFO'd all over the place throughout the entirety of the timeline when Zen began it's existence. Not even a week without a massive fuck-up by Judes.
It's not even 10% and it's way more than just twice, because Zen's price dropped somewhat since then, while Inturd didn't cut a slightest cent. They never do.
Why does this same shitty ''''''''''leak'''''''''' keep getting reposted on different sites as if it has an legitimacy?
A sucker is born every minute
I run a high res monitor. I don't have time for AMD's shittery.
High refresh i meant.
>GayNexus
CLEARLY you have a lot of shittery in your anal roster bitch ass.
I don't care.
>Кoк-пoк
Яcнo, пoнятнo.
Why are amd fans such an angry crowd?
They can't make it to the end of their posts without insults and namecalling
Their fans usually do fly apart during high loads.
kek based
cores, Turbo up to 4.7GHz on ALL (meaning 100% stable 4.2 and 4.4 on ALL are GUARANTEED)
cores, Turbo up to 5GHz
cores, Turbo up to 5GHz
WAIT FOR 10NM
More housefires GUD
>shitel can't do 144fps
NONO MUH MONITOR
>1080p
>medium settings
>137.5 average fps
dare I say 1080p@144hz is dead?
I'm sitting here playing witcher 3 maxed out at 144 fps with the riva tuner frame cap. I won't touch amd for high frame rates ever in my life. Why would i buy something that's in second place?
Absolutely not actually. 80% of everyone is running 1080p in steam. i'd rather have 138.5fps than 90. Sorry.
at medium settings?
nah man Id rather play @60 high settings
You really need to see the benefit of a 144hz monitor. You'll wonder why you stuck with 60hz
Take leaks with a fistful of NaCl
Let's see the reviews & benchmark after official release
Great if true, if not I'll just hold on to my 2500k
Thats how you bankrupt yourself when doing professional any work.