9900k

sloppy job mossad

>falling for 9900k when you have 9700k

2990WX

Attached: 2990WX.jpg (425x315, 18K)

Fuck this word.

>score difference of 28 will change the fact that a 220$ CPU will outperform a $500 one.

it's within margin of error you dimwit

Who started this meme packaging?

Good CPU but overpriced, nothing else to say.

Good for burning your house indeed.

lmao, its one of the lowest scores for a 9900k i've seen.

>work as firefighter
>get bonuses for meeting/beating specific quotas
>gift someone an i9 9900K
>their house burns down
>repeat until quota is met
>get paid a hefty sum of cash
>it's the old Roman trick

kek

Attached: 1557268598541.jpg (1327x1222, 331K)

/thread

Attached: terry_dance.gif (300x424, 2.56M)

Hi, NSA/CIA!

Attached: your move NSA.jpg (608x608, 55K)

:)

Attached: Cinebench-multi.png (1327x1222, 66K)

>running on air
>but muh house fire
doesnt even break 80 under load. those retards have it way over-volted

Attached: muh house fire.png (1858x846, 521K)

>cherry-picks a picture with the CPU at idle and doesn't attempt to tax it with a real stress test for ~1hr of running time

>idle temperature
lmao

>10cents for a small piece of sand
>50usd for a big plastic package
It will be 699.99usd

I debunked this in a thread the other day. Benchmark is bias as fuck.

Attached: Untitled.jpg (1853x749, 505K)

9900K bro, Fuck the haters.

Attached: hurr.jpg (861x577, 205K)

No, you're just retarded. You're running with faster ram, hence the difference. Basically, Intel is fucked. I'll be enjoying my 16c/32t Zen 2 for only $560. You enjoy your regrets.

Attached: 1543945073164.jpg (679x480, 157K)

> i9
> performs like Ryzen 5
OH NO NO NO NO

But 9900KFC

>6th place

Attached: file.png (925x634, 140K)

Good post
Thank you OP

Any more?