Are all the options for 4k terrible right now?
VA
>angles, gamma shift, have to sit too far from screen
IPS
>some alright, most garbage
>IPS glow on every panel, have to sit too far from screen, hit or miss backlight bleed
I own both. Neither compare to a cinema projector in actually being able to appreciate the resolution, not unless you're fine with shit like pic related.
4k
>he fell for the IPS meme
TN master race
>Neither compare to a cinema projector
Well you're comparing sub $500 monitors to $5000+ projectors.... what exactly were you expecting?
I would like to point out that isp bleed is much worse on photos than in person, also you can lower the brightness of your screen for less bleed.
I had a 21.5" TN monitor and since viewing angles were so shit the bottom of my screen was lighter than the top and that was driving me crazy.
Ips will be the best untill microled comes out
>I would like to point out that isp bleed is much worse on photos than in person
They probably set the exposure on their camera to be super long, to make it stand out.
I literally can't notice it unless it's a completely black screen and I'm actively looking for it.
>muh exposure conspiracy
Literally:
>>he fell for the rich life meme
>homeless master race
>looking to buy a 2k/4k ips
>half of people saying stuff like "oh it changed my life, I could never go back!"
>half of the rest of people just complaining about stuff like backlight bleed, bad panels, glow, etc
just going to stick with TN. this is too confusing
OLED, if you can swing the bigger size and cost.
>inb4 burn-in
Save it for movies and games and you'll be fine. You can even use it as a desktop display if you take some precautions (low saturation theme, auto-hide taskbar, no icons on desktop, auto-off after a few minutes).
If a monitor's faults require the user to use it as little as possible then isn't that a really, really shit option?