Now that Linux is officially google botnet can we have a list of distros that are both free of linux botnet and systemd...

Now that Linux is officially google botnet can we have a list of distros that are both free of linux botnet and systemd trash?

Attached: trident.png (1280x1024, 964K)

Void

>Linux is google botnet
(citation needed)

what the fuck are you event talking about, nigger

Antix

berkeley software distribution m'boi

also doesnt parabola or hyperbola provide runit options

OpenBSD

(Source Required)

Linux is under the GPL license, a company could not simply take control since their code is distributed freely. If you use Linux Libre then there are no firmware blobs at all while you benefit from all contributions.

in raw LOC and other monetary/personnel contributions, google is the largest contributor to the linux kernel

>google is biggest monetary contributor
>therefore it's google botnet
fucking brainlets omg. It's OPEN SOURCE you can MONITOR the code and there is N O T H I N G watching you.

Somebody's is still checking that out, buddy

i like minix
it is in every intel cpu

>It's OPEN SOURCE you can MONITOR the code
No-one actually does this. "Trusted" people get their code waved through without any checks.
>and there is N O T H I N G watching you.
You can't be sure.

>You can't be sure.
Run wireshark on your network cards?

> No-one actually does this.
By that logic, Google might as well be the 1000th largest contributor or be hiding behind a single commit by a single person among many, you'd still have the same problem.

> You can't be sure.
That is normal. But what you or the other scared people can do is find some instances where google or whoever fucks us all.

If you can't when all source is in plain sight and open to your or software based inspection, why do assert it is hostile?

Attached: 2ILhpxW-300x199.png (300x199, 95K)

AryanLinux v1.488

You're the one making the claim. Point out which lines of code are botnet.

Install OpenBSD

dualEC

The logic is that they commit enough code that it creates a google dependency, brianlet.

and yet, Google didn't even try to roll out a desktop distro that would have forced the hand of vendors to support Linux as a first class citizen.

Really makes you think

>what is ChromeOS

A failure.

its used in every classroom in schools and businesses across america.
it is anything but a failure, and is the new "mac for education"
despite the rumors of being killed off, google is doubling down on it by integrating it into android and fuschsia

Not provided as a consumer product, only for oem devices and community ports.

>consumer product
chromebooks, chromeboxes, chromesticks, chromethings
>oem devices and community ports
imagine moving the goalposts even in the same sentence.
the original assertion was that google didnt have a linux desktop.
that has been refuted, q.e.d.
n.b. google also used their internal ubuntu fork called "goobuntu" (no, really) and then switched to a gentoo based "golinux"

Attached: voetbalverzorger.jpg (500x419, 204K)

>No-one actually does this. "Trusted" people get their code waved through without any checks.
except linus himself told a red hat dev that he's retarded when he attempted to push PE parsing into the kernel. linux isn't cucked, not yet anyway

checked and NSA'd

Based quints.

void, antix, alpine, mx, devuan, the bsd team, omni and smart os

that's about it

Lol dude just write you're own kernel and port all you're favorite userland software onto it
Lol dude
Lole

Attached: 86c337c6558cdc881bec26646b85a4d2e6822376_00.jpg (320x320, 20K)

what is PE parsing?

nice digits
youre wrong, though

Attached: how_linux_was_born_as_told_by_linus_tor.jpg (1024x1024, 55K)

Slackware, naturally. It's the thinking man's distro.