Which distro is objectively the best?

You knew the answer before making a new thread
Ubuntu is the best choice of newbies
Always

Elementary OS

alpine

Windows. lol
fuck linux and autistic linuxfags

why, my peenus weanus of course :)

hahah! :D

it's my weeeeeenus peanus! :) hahah

ITT: the best distro - my answer is, of course, my peanus weenus :D

hahaha!

NixOS

For someone who knows their shit it doesn't really matter. Just install the software you want and get rid of the software you don't.

For a newb, it depends on how capable you are of reading documentation and Googling your problems. If you just want a good ootb experience without knowing what's going on behind the scenes, use any flavour of Ubuntu or Fedora.
If you actually want to learn something use Debian, Arch, Slackware or maybe even Gentoo.

This
also Arch if you don't wanna compile

kys pajeet

Just load them all up in virtual machines desu

Windows 10 Pro

Attached: 1491723959852.jpg (249x249, 55K)

Probably Ubuntu Mate

Antergos

this

Debian or Gentoo, flip a coin and pick one of the two.

whichever ubuntu version you think looks good,

youtube.com/watch?v=PWp51BAzn-8

this boomer makes good videos about distros

no such thing but anything other than openSUSE, Ubuntu, Debian or Fedora is incel freak tier

Ubuntu or elementaryOS

Xubuntu > Ubuntu.
Debian stable with backports > Any other Debian.
Manjaro >= Arch (unless you want to update)
L4N > Any other distro (if you work for the US Gov).
Any distro without systemd > Any distro with systemd.
Windows > Linux for office suites, image editors and spyware.

Windows 10

What does office offer which libreoffice doesn't? You can still do basic bitch regression and t-score and shit in calc, and you really should be moving to R if you want to do anything more.
Writer is a text processor, just like word, I can't really think of any functions I miss from word, other than the slightly less obnoxious auto bibliography (which isn't even that good anyway in word)

fact: solus is the most powerful distro in the world

Bedrock

I thought people thought that the Manjaro devs were retards who held updates hostage. Is Manjaro actually better than Arch?

Attached: ploot question.jpg (276x277, 34K)

i don't use it nor do i really like it that much but objectively i would go for debian because the wide use of it in server and in Desktop, the many forks that originated from it and the intuitive management. if you search something linux related on google the first thing you'll find is Debian/Buntu related
>still shilling that meme
words do have the meaning we give them and in the public understanding linux is the whole operating system

Anything based on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is not shit for the average consumer.

Fedora > CentOS > Ubuntu > Debian > openSUSE

Rest are memes with no pvrpose. For example you can disregard Arch and use openSUSE as rolling release.

LO has a worse performance than MSOffice. You can do the same stuff, but MSO is more responsive and more user friendly (= to less time not actually working).
Editing the same file in both also reorganizes stuff, some examples are:
>text and spacing in .doc files
>charts saving as images or un-linking their data source in .xls files
>font size in .ppt.

Antergos for newbies
Arch for intermediates
Gentoo for advanced users
BSD for hypergods

the one you like best.

Plan9, OpenBSD, TempleOS.

B A S E D
A S E D
S E D
E D
D

Attached: tut-clear-linux.png (840x370, 33K)

Corel Linux.

>if you search something linux related on google the first thing you'll find is Debian/Buntu related
maybe, but the solution will be ither on the arch wiki or in the arch forums

Depends on the use case

I think you mean openSOOSEE

Debian xfce

The last time I used office was office (used it for a decade or so) 2007 and libreoffice gives that same feel

>kernel logo
Will this ever end

Attached: Alpine_Linux_logo_web.jpg (620x350, 65K)

>arch wiki or in the arch forums
gentoo wiki and forums are way better, i use booth sources but gentoo offers more solutions to troubleshoot thanks to the many possible ways you can configure it.
you use arch, don't you?

>Will this ever end
no
tell me about alpine, i sometimes see alpine pop up here but there seem to be no real shills for it

No, fuck off, Tux is good boy

I do, (btw). And yeah, I've found solutions for some of my problems in the Gentoo resources as well, but I think that the Arch resources are just more vast, especially the forums. U think it comes to the fact that the Arch userbase is way bigger tthan the Gentoo one.

linux is not, gnu/linux is

nice for routers or embedded, shit as daily driver

Deepin

oh, yeah maybe. i just search stuff up myself in old forums and wikis, i don't ask much questions tbqh. i don't like it to have to wait for a solution when i can figure it out myself
thank you

As someone that tried many, I'd say unironically Arch.

right

Attached: 53572958_420215582123097_8018462929542184960_o.jpg (1365x2048, 299K)

why?

>nice for routers or embedded, shit as daily driver

That applies to Linux in general. Not just Alpine.

This shit blows everything else out te water. It's fast af, just werks, and has constant updates.

Makes you learn the basics of linux/the terminal/problemsolving.
Rolling realease, so updating the system doesn't mean reinstalling.
You can say that you use Arch.

the one install on your computer TM

>problemsolving
so it isn't broken, it's a feature
>You can say that you use Arch.
i see

Attached: 1542803369903.jpg (394x399, 36K)

lfs + vi + ratpoison

the one that is not based in another one:
debian, gentoo, arch, fedora (inb4 red hat: since inmemoriable times fedora is the red hat upstream)

updating in a rolling release actually means reinstalling because your config files will stop working. in a release based distro your config will work as long as you stay in the same major version like fedora or debian

actually forget I writted arch, for the reason on the post above. rolling release is broken by design and forces you to read changelogs every upgrade

void because it is the most supported one ever made.

Is it so hard to subscribe to the mailing list or just look at archlinux.org before updating (btw, last problem that reqired manual intervention was In July of 2018. If I were to be using Ubuntu I would have reinstalled the system completely since then because they update twice a year.

Based

Manjaro was created for people that are too lazy to install arch.

the best linux distro doesn't exists.
just look at the intallgentoo wiki and chose whatever is the best for you.
wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/Babbies_First_Linux

Android

Imagine not using fedora/kde with kde connect

Attached: 1551922140446.gif (500x491, 376K)

This desu. Only need more packages and a package manager with dependencies.