Which one is the good guy?

Which one is the good guy?

Attached: file.png (382x203, 138K)

Neither.

Both.

Both.

Neither.

linus is a fucking hack. a chink-tier copycat
at least stallman has fsf

Neutral Evil and True Neutral

>at least stallman has fsf
Stallman does disservice to the free software philosophy by being an unmarketable dirty hobo.

RMS was more helpful.

the finn obviously. fuck kikes

One of them is from a tribe that been kicked out of a hundred nations. The other got his kernel named after him.

Linus, he makes shit open source because it's the right thing to do. RMS has turned free software into a religious cult.

First post, most accurate post.
Although GNU guy is the least harmful.

A pragmatist who got shit done and improved the world by providing us with with the best *NIX kernel out there which is also free software and powers operating systems, infrastructure and the newest cloudshit everywhere...

Or a dogmatist nobody seriously listens to and whose greatest achievement were shitty copies of the UNIX userland which he claims are more important than the kernel of an operating system.

Hmm... a difficult choice.

Based

Attached: drunk-kernel-developer.gif (356x280, 72K)

this

*ahem*

Attached: Steve_Ballmer_Sweat.jpg (630x500, 69K)

linus is chaotic good, stallman is true neutral.

Champion for freedom vs. Rude kernel man.

Attached: 1513032335877.png (212x238, 5K)

Linus is true nuetral. RMS is chaotic good.

stallman is obsessed with licenses and rules, how is that chaotic? i would say he's lawful neutral but his rules are generally reciprocal agreements more than authoritarian mandates. he doesn't really care as much about creating good software as he does creating a reciprocating software economy.

Linus: Endless kernel patches.
RMS: Always right.

this

Rude Kernel Man is my favorite superhero

>Which one is the good guy?
Stallman paves the way to Linus. But without Linux, we would have an age of proprietary Unix servers and unification by Windows servers.

>Stallman paves the way to Linus.
hot

Stallman is lawful good.
Linus is chaotic good.

Stallman is obviously true neutral dumbfuck

Linus is chaotic good, Stallman is lawful neutral.

What is Tanenbaum? I bet he is a spook

/thread

He is a guy who made a kernel strictly for educational purposes but got an asspain because Linux was infinitely more popular almost immediately because it was actually available.

Attached: 1399250059712.jpg (750x462, 34K)

これ。

Just different utilities.
Stallman is the guy who invented the free software license, created a foundation, etc. Envisioned everything. He is practically a computer monk. Warns people about issues like Facebook and the nsa when everyone called him a lunatic only to be proved right time and time again. Stallman is the morality of free software.
But people aren't very moral or care and we live in a capitalist society so linus Torvalds packages up everything in a nice bow and sells it to corporations because that's just how society works.
Stallman is metaphysical.
Linus is nominal.

*swede

no finn has ever amounted to anything, they're a lower species and would still be living in forests if finland's swedish minority wasn't there to hold their society together

this.

Correct.


FSF is a cult, RMS is its cult leader. The gpl is a restrictive license, it restricts people to the terms of the license. These have absolutely nothing to do with freedom.

kek, this, even got his mousepad

Attached: mousepad.jpg (1065x800, 627K)

>being this retard

Attached: 1536672392827.png (638x359, 408K)

RMS.

It's restrictive in the sense that in a free society you're restricted from owning slaves

The bigger question is, what will happen when they die? Probably nothing

Attached: 15281.jpg (1000x1000, 253K)

Linus is true neutral, Stallman is chaotic neutral.

There are no good or bad guys.

Don't worry, sooner or later the SJW npcs will weasel their way into that organization too, then they'll kick him out and make the fsf quite "marketable".

The same thing that happens with any other death.
They will stop breathing, their hearts will stop pumping blood, and as a result their brain will be deprived of oxygen and will swiftly be damaged beyond repair. Very soon, all neuronal activity will stop and they'll be permanently dead.
In a little while, they will turn pale, and their body temperature will drop to match the ambient.
After that, their muscles will be totally deprived of energy and will become stiff, and their blood will slowly accumulate towards the bottom part of the body, due to gravity.
After that, they're cells will start dying en-mass and their bodies will start decomposing, gathering a ton of bacteria and parasites in the process. The bacteria inside their guts especially will have a party...
Due to decomposition and dehydration, their bodies will shrink a little, making it seem like their hair and nails have grows while dead, but that's just an illusion.
The accumulated amounts of gas in their guts, due to the bacterial of the large intestine, will expand and make them look bloated. There's also a possibility that their bellies will literally explode due to that.
And lastly, they'll keep decomposing until there's no more soft tissue left, only bones.

We'll find out who had the bigger dick.

leftone hate people (good guy)
rightone love people (bad guy)

Actually, no. Linus is chaotic good while Stallman is lawful good.

هذه

>Linux/GNU
delid this

الْأَصَحُ أَنْ تَقُوْلَ هَذَا.

Attached: 1543832959356.jpg (1024x1024, 110K)

*ahem*
FUCK NVIDIA and FUCK DRIVERS

علمني

إنَّ العلومَ معالمٌ، فالتمسْ طريقَهَا؛ تنل رحيقها.

Attached: oldmanwhiskers.jpg (800x584, 156K)