OH NONONONONOO OhHOHOHO OOOOO

OH NONONONONOO OhHOHOHO OOOOO....

Attached: 1557955139068.jpg (1562x959, 382K)

Yikes

Attached: 1557343086149.png (1114x1214, 828K)

I don't really get it. Which one has the real color grading, and can they not both produce the other's image?

>comparing a big elephant turd to a dog turd
get a real camera faggot

give it to me str8 my red haired anime babe

that right, I carry my DSLR with me every day

Based

Attached: 1539313054632.gif (540x304, 1.86M)

yes

$ 1200 vs $ 399
Really makes you think

>that neon red coffee cup on the right

Attached: 1557717349916.png (629x446, 14K)

APPLE BTFO

Look at the sky on the iphone.
No amount of photoshopping can save that trainwreck.

If the 3a had expandable storage it would be perfect

>Compares a 2019 phone to a 2017 flagship

good job showing the world what a dumb fuck you are, and I don't even like apple products

absolutely based

Attached: 1516406424044.jpg (802x1280, 112K)

the one on the left looks washed out, too cool, and dark.
the on the right almost looks computer generated.

the color is the most striking difference but it's not the most important one- it's just a white balance issue, the impressive part is how much higher the dynamic range on the right image is. Notice how the sky isn't blown out and how you can see more details in the wood?

>changes white balance
>changes what is being exposed for
heh, nothing personnel kid...

It's not just a white balance issue. If you toned down the left one, the foreground would just be completely black. You need significant software processing, and that's where Google completely BTFOs Apple.

yikes

Attached: 1535298719140.jpg (1600x800, 115K)

shit hasn't changed that much in two years. a 2017 flagship should btfo a 2019 midrange

doesn't matter. 100% of instasluts NEED to have the apple logo at the back of their phones while taking a selfie in the mirror. that logo is worshiped so much that it is second only to the abrahamic god

Attached: 1544118043988.png (631x757, 341K)

yikes !

iTODDLERS

CONSTANTLY

CONTINUALLY

UNCEASINGLY

UNREPEALABLY

UNREMITTINGLY

PERPETUALLY

PERSISTENTLY

PERMANENTLY

INVARIABLY

INCESSANTLY

IRREVOCABLY

INTERMINABLY

INDELIBLY

INDEFINITELY

EVERLASTINGLY

ENDLESSLY

ETERNALLY

BLOWN

THE

FUCK

OUT

UNTIL THE END OF TIME

Attached: 1544025839023.gif (500x281, 1.6M)

>taking photos with smart phones
Any basic point and shit camera has 3-5X the quality of a phone camera.
Sensor sizes are still shit on phones.

> using ip
> instasluts

Attached: 1524115525995.jpg (1024x1024, 118K)

I cried

I have a Canon Powershot ELPH 360 HS. I think it's pretty good. Although I did come from a 20 year old digital point and shoot. It was a Panasonic DMC LC33 or something. 16mb SD card, 3 megapixels etc.

Attached: iToddlerBTFO.gif (500x491, 376K)

The 3a has the same exact image sensor as the 3 and 3XL. This is the power of Night Sight. Try again, toddler

Attached: 1554318650189.png (468x468, 112K)

Based, point n' shoot's still BTFO the best phone cameras.

I hope the pixel also shoots raw without any processing applied. Now THAT would definitely BTFO apple.

Android photo app already shoots raw.

>iphone x release - 2017
>Pixel 3 release - 2018

Gee, guess you're still a fucking idiot. Redo the test with a phone that actually has additional computational photography enabled, like the XR/XS