Intels 10nm = TSMC/Samsungs 7nm
Who are really the jews here?
Daily reminder
Kevin Bailey
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikichip.org
twitter.com
Charles Davis
Doesn't Intel's 10nm suck so much that Skylake outperforms it?
Julian Gomez
intel doesn't have 10nm yet, but TSMC and Samsung dont have 7nm.
Brayden Wright
CannonLake is 10nm, isn't it?
Benjamin Flores
>TSMC and Samsung dont have 7nm.
David Clark
They are very low power mobile processors but sure
Gabriel Miller
en.wikichip.org
Their 7nm is actually worse than Intels 10nm.
Mason Price
Intel's 10nm is actually more denser and powerful than TSMC 7nm.
I truly believe that Intel are sandbagging. Here's why
>They're waiting to check how much AMD 7nm is faster than their 14nm
>AMD Zen 2 AT BEST would be equivalent or 3-5% faster than their 14nm Coffee Lake
>Unless something drastic happens, lithography tech is at its limit. AMD has possibly (if TSMC see it as feasible) just one more step, 5nm, to go while Intel has 10nm, 7nm and possibly 5nm.
>It would be foolish to release 10nm right now if AMD's 7nm is barely equivalent to your 14nm
Remember, Intel are gigantic jews. I 100% believe they have working 10nm but they're holding it back because of AMD Zen 2. They're waiting to see where the market goes with Zen 2 launch, especially the 16 core part, and will respond accordingly.
Anthony Ross
>sandbagging
Sure, they have been """sandbagging"" since before Zen1 was released, 10nm should have been ready years ago.
Eli Gomez
>Who are really the jews here?
Both because neither has feature sizes the names suggest.