He doesnt own an SSD drive in year 2019

>muh 2007 anecdote
Not him but you will die before your SSD die...

You need to swap these around, owning an SSD is one of the biggest virgin indicators there is.

same, since 2011

Attached: 2019-05-20 17_05_49-CrystalDiskInfo 7.6.0.png (666x476, 56K)

This. Chad never customizes his MacBook so it comes with a HDD.

>bought OCZ Vertex 3 60 Gb back in 2011 during HDD deficiency
>still going strong to this day
Although it is obviously slower than modern SSDs.

>SSD drive
I'm not answering to someone with RAS syndrome

*dies without notice*

I'm such a poorfag right now I can barely afford to feed myself and get around. For the moment my hard drives will have to do.

I've bought ~8 SSDs for various systems since 2010.

ALL of them are still in action and working.

Look at my 4K speeds (and endurance per GB is 5-6x superior compared to the 970 PRO 1TB)

Attached: Screenshot_23.png (399x362, 37K)

Also going to add that this is on a boot drive; measuring it remotely has even higher 4KQ1T1 (about 170MB/s on read and 150MB/s on write; this is CPU limited seems the SSD can do higher)

>solid state drive drive

>imagine being this much of a speedlet

Attached: Capture.png (400x365, 12K)

1. wtf happened?
2. what's the 4kq1t1

Here is my 950 Pro 250GB from 2015.

Also my boot drive.

Attached: 2019-05-20 17_23_00.png (416x380, 39K)

updated from a 9yo 60gb adata to a samsung 850evo, wew lad, 2-3s bootup.
too bad intel fucked everone over and halved the random access times.

This

I accidentalied it.

fixed

Attached: Capture 2.png (402x366, 36K)

you don't

What's a "solid state drive drive"?
I only have an SSD

*outlives you*

Attached: 123.png (965x849, 302K)

Why are NVMe drives so much faster 4KiB Q8T8 and R/W 4KiB Q32T1 when is that useful(serious question)

moving around files with lots of little chunks.

>solid state DRIVE drive

Automated teller machine machine.

>SSD-Z
my sides

It's a meme you fucking newfag dips, Jesus Christ, back to plebbit.

>memes
to reddit you go back to.

>SSD-Z
>Last update 2016
>No drive made after 2016 is recognized
big yikes

Attached: .png (951x297, 68K)

I built my system just before SSD's took off. Im running a WD velciraptor 10k in my rig. Funny, my celeron netbook and i5 netbook both have SSD's. Hell, I even have on in my PS3 for no real good reason...

Virtually nothing that I do is I/O-bound. There you go.

it's probably an old picture.
Your pic will look slow too, once pcie4.0 nvme drives become common.

actually, that might not happen, given that QLC is the new trend (QLC is slower than a normal HDD, but has ludicrous data density - 1tb on a single chip and the like).

chronic broke

nobody fucking cares you turbovirgins.

>Thad
Shouldn't it be Guile?

don't most consumer devices come with an ssd these days? are corporations really milking things that much? im actually asking, I don't know because I assemble my own computers and pay for high-end servers, i'm not really connected to what consumer-level stuff is like

Here are the standard Inspiron 14" laptops from dell.

Attached: 2019-05-20 23_13_46.png (1178x1038, 100K)

QLC is only slower if its extremely full or under sustained loads.

I wouldn't buy a QLC but don't pretend they aren't miles better than HDD for 99% of the population

WD Blue/Green SSDs any good?

Solid, but only Blue.

Still expensive

well compared to HDDs sure, but it's never going to be cheaper than HDDs are so if you're waiting for that you're just kinda retarded.

You can get a 250GB drive on sale for $25, or a 1TB on sale for around $90.

whats the linux equivalent?

I don't know anyone who matters/isn't poor that runs windows

Manjaro, MX, Zorin.

Sure, they're great when they're working, but you get no hints when things are starting to go bad. It happens immediately, and when the SSD goes, it goes down hard, taking all the data with it. At least with a(n) HDD, you often get some tell-tale signs that allow you to transfer your data before it is too late.

So what? It's trivial to keep a backup on an HDD, which you should be doing anyway, even with an HDD as those can fail as well without warning.

A 250-500GB SSD is hardly a problem to backup when you can get 8TB external HDDs for $140.

amazon.com/dp/B07D5V2ZXD

>those NVMe speeds
yikes

Funny, That drive was released in 2012, not 2011.

It's nice being an ascended chad

Attached: Latest_Numbers.png (402x367, 35K)

nice

raid or ram?

Two Samsung 970 pros in raid 0. Don't do it, my boot times are random as fuck and my life is constant fear.

Kind of slow for NVMe, yes. An average for modern NVMe (PCI-e 3.0) is 2800 on reads and 2200 on writes.

>believing the skewed benchmarks
Real world performance is only a tiny percentage better than a good fucking HDD and HDDs are so much more reliable than your fucking SSD shit which will run out of write cycles in a few years while I still have working HDDs from the 90s.
Nice try though, SSD paid shills.

Looks pretty similar to the Intel 660p that I'm using. It's slow for NVME, but still drastically faster than SATA and without the price premium.

ram would be much faster than that

>turbovirgins.
There is no such thing, and you have to be 18 to post here.

Get help.

Y-y-yeah but that was long time a-ago

I just bought myself an older m.2 2280 ssd.
Did i just cuck myself?
Does this have any tangible benefit to a regular ssd?

Have sex.

That virgin HDD will last more than both your SATA and NVME SSD combined.
Why are we not getting any innovation in this space and when will this SSD meme die?

Lose weight.

>waiting for HDD to make noises before backing up
>the ability for HDD to make noises is therefore fundamental to my back up scheme

the current state of nu-Jow Forums

>leak from the logic Gates
Spinning rust == spinning trust

Attached: 1558384349219.jpg (1200x1800, 820K)

how fast is ram disk

As fast as your ram is.

this
intel 660 is so far the best middleground

50-60Gb/s?

*lasts 100+ years*

Attached: 1544277232747.jpg (350x350, 27K)

linux

Attached: fio_crop.png (1000x900, 149K)

Is this considered good?

Attached: disk.png (802x692, 587K)

well for context my shitty ddr3 runs at about 21000 MB/s

gaming stupid question, is there a point to run two SSDs? would OS run better If I put it on separate SSD?

What drive are you using?

Been looking at upgrades, mine only does like 800MB/s

it's just whatever comes stock with a Dell XPS 13 9370
running 5.0.9 kernel

>not using optane

Attached: lmaoNVMEbtfoIntelWinsAgain.png (402x367, 41K)

I don't have a reason to own one, the only concrete benefit is faster boot times but that's not important to me

>D: 0% (0/998MiB)
That's a RAM drive, fucking shill.

people bragging about SSD's:

"i'm the better, faster idiot, look how fast i do nothing and fuck shit up"

Attached: 4231670e.png (452x446, 40K)

>58GB
>muh endurance per GB
aghaahaaahahahaa

no its all the optane i could afford

Has anyone who upgraded from a SATA SSD to an NVME ever noticed a substantial difference? Does it ever feel faster?

Attached: 1498636127043.gif (247x236, 496K)

no

Shitty bait

I haven't done NVME but shit like Tinycore which runs the OS in RAM or running certain games in a ramdisk (Some have 0 loading time reduction, some have absolutely massive reductions) can make for a far better experience, although it's diminishing returns outside of a few extreme examples like Skyrim loaded up with 10,000 mods and texture packs

Is dis gud?

Attached: DiskMark64S_MDheevdyOR.jpg (1600x1280, 532K)

I don't get it. Apart from booting the OS why do you guys care so much about write/read speed?

I'm poor!