YouTube fucking up their shit

>support.google.com/youtube/thread/6543166

Attached: Screenshot_20190524-023054_Twitter.jpg (1006x1021, 381K)

>creators are so buttblasted they have to hide their sub counts

YouTube is changing this because people unsub-nuked this beauty tranny's channel.

Attached: DZ_663eU0AIsNkw.jpg (934x1200, 125K)

Rip socialblade.

WHY WOULD THEY ABBREVIATE IT THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE WHAYMT IF WE STARTED ROUNDING ALL MEASUREMENTS TO THE NEAREST 5 HOLY FUCKING SHIT I HATE BRAIN DEAD NORMAL FAGSP

fuck sake. We seriously need a competitor to YouTube. I'd fucking suck Microsoft's dick, shill their disaster operating system, if they made one.

>people mass unsubscribe from channels when they do something heinous
>realize that this is bad for profits
>time to make it so live subscription counts aren't available
I really want to know how long YouTube has left desu

Attached: 1498808648006.jpg (634x853, 67K)

YT is always fucking shit up

>when you realise this is a male
holy fuck, we have really fucked ourselves up with these chemicals

What's wrong with 4,223 being 4K or 4.2K until they hover? I don't need to know of the extra 223 because it's not relevant. If it is, someone will hover or visit the section on their channel where it's fully displayed.

Why not stop there, they could simply get rid of the counters entirely and replace with a colour coded progress bar.

>what is bitchute?
>what is minds?
it's okay, user.
no need to suck my dick.
this one's on the house.

>it's not relevant
for you

you're a big guy.

All the Nazis whining about it proves it's the right choice.

Fuck off idiot.

based troll poster

not really competitors, they don't have ads right? nobody will make videos for a platform unless they can make money out of it

cool it with the antisemitism

It's literally just makeup, he's not even trans. He looks male without makeup on. You don't have to go all Infowars because a boy made your pp hard

Attached: 1557374582446.jpg (250x244, 5K)

>nobody will make videos for a platform unless they can make money out of it
People made youtube videos for profit in 2005?

He could go chop his dick off for starters.

the point is that a male would willingly make themselves look like that and pretend to be a fucking female, it's a mental illness and society should not be encouraging it
>implying i could get erect to such a creature

>going through such extreme cope just because you got hard to a dude

nice projection

He's not pretending to be a female, he's just wearing makeup laddie. I'm sorry about your internalized homophobia though, maybe someday you'll settle down with a nice boy who treats you right. Perhaps after many years, once you can admit your gayness

I'm not homophobic, but you have to admit it's not normal to make yourself look like the other gender. either his brain is fried from childhood abuse, PTSD, or his mother drank from too many plastic bottles

Or he's just doing it for attention, like attention whores of which there literal billions in the world.

The problem is that YouTube loses a tremendous amount of money.

>People made youtube videos for profit in 2005?
No, but it's not 2005 anymore, YouTube has completely changed when people realized you can profit through ad revenue. YouTube became untouchable because of that.

Like I said, he might as well chop his dick off and get a fuckhole that will be stuffed every so often.

>If it is, someone will hover or visit the section on their channel where it's fully displayed.
You fucking idiot. The change they are making is that the full count will not be publicly displayed anywhere. Ever. You will not be able to see accurate subscriber counts for any channel with more than 1,000 subs, anywhere.

>nobody will utilize free hosting
Are you retarded? Do you have any idea how mcuh YouTube subsidizes hosting costs?

'normal' is subjective. you are probably not normal in another persons world view.

that said, I personally hate fags and am not so weak that I need to say "hurr durr i'm not homophobic" before admitting how much I hate fags.

this is not normal

Holy fuck you're such a subhuman

>Bitchute
Too much Jow Forums and /x/ garbage
>What is Patreon

>I'm sorry about your internalized homophobia though, maybe someday you'll settle down with a nice boy who treats you right. Perhaps after many years, once you can admit your gayness

Attached: soyjak.png (644x800, 43K)

>YouTube makes a change
>people don't like it

Stop being so entitled

there isnt any GOOD alternative

>everything that doesn't fit muh social construct is haram

o the horror.
certainly, if someone you despise breathes air, you will refuse to breathe?

Do any of you have channels? Ive been working my ass off to build one

but i know my luck as soon as it starts bringing in any sort of money this site will fucking die and it will be all for naught

Ponchato is a tech youtuber that posts here, he has like 20k subs or something

>He could
he won't because all he is is a conman.

I have 200 subs on mine. sounds small but it's mostly all from the last 3 months and gaining momentum. All I do is record mountain outings though.

mine is about plants, im at about 6k.

In my category if you arent a gay man or a middle aged women no one subs to you

whatever you do, dont take a break from posting or youtube will fuck your shit.

Also reduce all unnecessary footage, youtube just cares about watch time. so if you add like 1 or 2 minutes of shit people would probably click away from at like the end or something. it will hurt you and your percentage watched

My theory is a chemical imbalance in the brain.
The internet is full of them.

>My theory is a chemical imbalance in the brain.
t. knows nothing about actual biology

Yeah I'd make 7-8 min videos and now just make them 4-5.

LOL, too much progesterone or estrogen seems like a decent theory, you have a better one?

Is this because of Pewdiepie and T-Series doing a subscriber war? And by association, the whole Christchurch thing?

No, it's obviously completely retarded if you have even basic understanding of human endocrine system.
For one, it would result in other forms of feminization more than brain feminization.
Gyno, low or no body hair, preventing balding, smaller hands, wide hips etc.

But not cutting off your dick and growing tits?

>"Arachophobic, huh? So you must secretly want to fuck a spider."

Why should I as the viewer care?

>studies show that homophobes get hard to gay porn
>m-muh spiders
Do some damn research. If statistically arachnophobes do actually want to fuck spiders, then you have an actual analogy.
Until then, all you have is cope and denial.

i'm sorry you have high suicide rates

Aracnaphobes hate spiders, aracnaphiles want to fuck them.

>Jow Forumstech shit
Use PeerTube and other FREE as in FREEDOM Fediverse tech you faggot.

It's normal and it's beautiful.

Because retards in this thread have no life outside of looking at numbers

Fuck those shitty ass sub count streams, I'm glad they're going to be dead after this

It's not relevant how you name it.
What is relevant is if being irrationally afraid of spiders correlates with being attracted to them sexually.
If it does, then arachnophobia is similar to homophobia. If it isn't, then the analogy is completely false.

It's not an analogy, it's the different latin suffix.

Read the entire conversation, retard.

what did they mean by this?

Attached: D7TOFOkWsAAkGIQ.jpg (870x1200, 190K)

nice elections dude

Attached: 1529181300143.png (420x520, 69K)

what is "flawed methodology"?
looking at any kind of pronography will induce at least a minimal state of arousal.
im not a fan of hetero anal, but even so, seeing it will spark at least a minimal response.
as another example, give people who hate furries furry porn, and hey will have at least some measurable arousal (related no doubt to anthopiced features and similarities to nonfurry porn) but it wil not change their minds.

>Male wears makeup
>user:
>THIS GUYS GOT TO BE ON SOMETHING
>HIS BRAIN MUST BE FRIED
>WHY DOES HE WANT TO BE A WOMAN
>CHILD ABUSE
>WHY IS MY pp HARD
>THIS ISNT NORMAL
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

>what is "flawed methodology"?
>looking at any kind of pronography will induce at least a minimal state of arousal.
Try reading up instead of shooting down a strawman.

Heterosexuals have minimal response to homosexual pornography.
Homophobes get significant erections, often full boners.
If it was just about this default response, homophobes would be comparable to controls.

Attached: 1549756956924.png (841x499, 466K)

who is the man in that pic?

jokes aside, it is a good move to avoid the mob mentality that was imported from twitter, and the whole deplatform wars
it is all like the political game on TV, but with ordinary people as targets
>omg, this youtuber once said that niggers btfo in a crochet forum board
>deplatform the guy
>all now go and unsubscribe because minorities

why would a "homophobe" volunteer?
what is selection bias?
homophobia isnt a single dimensional trait either, because as there are irrational and emotional homophobes who have averzions to the feminized faces of homosexuals, there are also intellectualized homophobes who despise them for their behaviors, such as being incubators for and verctors of the spread of disease.

This just means we have to unsub EVEN HARDER to show displeasure at channels.

but why
why is jewgle so fucking retarded

>why would a "homophobe" volunteer?
Doesn't work this way.
Telling people what will be measured would significantly alter the results.

>there are also intellectualized homophobes who despise them for their behaviors, such as being incubators for and verctors of the spread of disease
There are no "intellectualized homophobes", this is just a massive cope for when a retard half-realizes his beliefs are moronic, but instead of dropping them, seeks to rationalize.
If they were truly intellectualized, they would only hate specifically those homosexuals who have lots of sex with strangers and would hate heterosexuals who do the same.
And even then, it's still a cope if they readily accept the idea that average homosexual has 1000+ partners, even when said idea comes from incredibly and obviously flawed methodology.

He does it for free.

Attached: StefanMol.jpg (421x581, 39K)

istead of namecalling or stawmanning, would it kill you to have a little introspection ad self citicism?

is it not "cope" to presume that homophobes approve of promiscuity?
is it not cope to ignore the prevalence of promiscuity within "homosexuals" which makes homobobia a useful heuristic which selects against that behavior?

but, to attempt some reconcilliation with your position, isnt is also true that homosexuality is a spectrum?
that is, just as there is a core of homosexuals who are generally mysogynistic and gynophobic, there are also those more inclined to heterosexuality?
comparing the contemporary "homosexual" with the classical example, is to compare what is a "bisexual" pederasty of medium term monogamous relationships, with something less pure, less noble.

just as well, among homophobes, there is a spectrum of "minor irritation" which leads up to that asymptote of total indifference.

>is it not "cope" to presume that homophobes approve of promiscuity?
They certainly have much higher tolerance for it when it's heterosexual promiscuity.
>is it not cope to ignore the prevalence of promiscuity within "homosexuals"
It certainly is cope to invoke it as a reason to hate homosexuals when you do any of:
>not hate heterosexual promiscuity to similar extent
>greatly overrate the prevalence of homosexual promiscuity - ie. expect average homosexual to have over 5x as many sexual partners as average heterosexual
>hate homosexuals who are not promiscuous
If you do even one of those, saying you hate homosexuals for promiscuity is not a reason but an excuse and a cope.

>just as there is a core of homosexuals who are generally mysogynistic and gynophobic
Those are actually rare because homosexuality doesn't cause aversion to women, just lack of interest in them.
Just like homophobia, gynophobia is caused by environment, not some natural drive to hate what you aren't attracted to.

>comparing the contemporary "homosexual" with the classical example, is to compare what is a "bisexual" pederasty of medium term monogamous relationships, with something less pure, less noble.
????

>just as well, among homophobes, there is a spectrum of "minor irritation" which leads up to that asymptote of total indifference.
Doesn't change the fact that vast majority of homophobia has only one relationship with reason: opposition.

your conclusions are grounded in unfounded certitute in the meanings of the words you use.
you only dig in your heels, and mindlessly conflate homophobia with accptance of promiscuity.
i.e. C O P E

classical homsexuality was largely presented on an emotional and spiritual basis, not an exclusively physical.
contemprary homos barely tolerate one another, and attraction is almost exclusively physical.

Attached: 2_cognitive_dissonance.jpg (700x480, 103K)

>you only dig in your heels, and mindlessly conflate homophobia with accptance of promiscuity.
Now that's just plain lies, as you can clearly see in my post above.
You either have terrible reading comprehension or are in denial because it conflicts with your worldview so much your mask of sanity is breaking down.

>contemprary homos barely tolerate one another, and attraction is almost exclusively physical.
Yeah, that's why there are so many stable gay marriages between mediocre looking guys.
Stop drinking the kool-aid.

What did he do wrong?

No it isn't, you're cope is showing.

He's a fag that gets pushed as recommended to kids

corelations are not causation, but if a gay person is not a homophobe, the behavior and "culture" of the gay community is likey to turn him into one.
and it we are perfectly serious, the problems within the "gay community" are many, and grave.

and, i hope this is not a tangent, but in the interests of clear thinking, it is necessary to separate "disgust" from "hatred"
i think we can agree that hatred is wrong, but disgust may well be warranted.
after all, de gustatus non est disputantum.
the accussation of "homophobia" is too broad and far reaching, that its meaning is dissipated.
lets take it as a given, that smears against the good name of a large set of people, are necessarily worse than smears against a small set of people. (and less truthful, besides)

>hatred for the unnatural is wrong
Wah??? Why??

because they suck at programming and cannot get their databases and systems properly synchronized I guess

>if a gay person is not a homophobe, the behavior and "culture" of the gay community is likey to turn him into one
Stop drinking cool aid
Get your info from less biased sources than insincere ideologues who are pushing a worldview.

>it is necessary to separate "disgust" from "hatred"
No, they're both achieved the same route and have the same underlying mechanic.
In case of homophobia, they are the one and the same and are never found separately.

>the accussation of "homophobia" is too broad and far reaching, that its meaning is dissipated.
It covers an rather common and very uniform trait that doesn't need more than one name.
It's a very good descriptor and vast, vast majority of those who complain about it do so only because it makes them look bad - as it should, because irrational hatred that causes idiotic rationalization should be seen as bad.

YouTube probably is a semi sentiment being, all the systems the programmers and engineers have created are out of control.

i have no sources.
i think only for myself, in my own words, as a "devils advocate" agnostic about "fundamental" "truths".
it is something i advise for anyone, if you genuinely desire to become a better thinker.

certitude is the death of thought.

>muh feelings

>Now when it says 188k subs I won't be able to tell if it's 188,132 or 188,791

Who the fuck cares?

That is not what it says you fucking retard. Take a couple English classes and read the announcement again.

When a channel has over 1000 subscribers it starts getting abbreviated sub counts. 1k, 251k, etc. On different platforms this is inconsistent. The API allows exact sub counts, while the website rounds to the nearest thousand. What this change does is make all the services get the rounded number, at most numbers will be inaccurate by up to 499 subs, nothing more.

But I don't like videos there

You have "sources", you just fail to realize you're only seeing a cultivated, fake side of the story.

If you believe that majority of homosexuals are promiscuous or a part of "homosexual culture", you either have data that is just plain wrong (lies, very outdated, or unbelievably bad methodology like that 1000+ sex partners "study") or have standards for promiscuity so strict that most straight women wouldn't meet them either.
Nowadays, in first world countries, average male homosexual has less than twice the sexual partners of average heterosexual. This varies between countries and cities/states (lower where marriage is available), but doesn't reach the stupid level that is required for homophobic propaganda to work without lies.

If you believe that a non-negligible percentage of homophobia comes from rational evaluation of facts, then you either are very naive or have completely bogus data to approximate from.
Vast majority of the "reasons" don't apply to homosexuals in stable marriages, yet those still receive the same treatment.

is this a jojo cosplay?
because thats literally how jojo characters are drawn now

The sad thing is channels that make live streams of live subscriber counts get super chats so they're shooting themselves in the foot lol.

SocialBlade or anything that relies on the YouTube api

can someone explain to a brainlet like me why people are so assblasted about this?