Guile 2.9.2 is out!!!

its 4 times faster than 2.2

lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2019-05/msg00030.html

Attached: GNU-Guile-logo.svg.png (1200x646, 57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wingolog.org/archives/2017/03/15/guile-2-2-omg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Now it only needs to be another 40 times faster to be usable

t. pythonist

guile 2.2 was 3-10x faster than python
wingolog.org/archives/2017/03/15/guile-2-2-omg

python eternally btfo

>not using chicken

This is not Chez Scheme, though.

chicken is compiled
guile is JIT and its as fast

if guile is 12-40x faster than python I might as well check it out, I already use emacs. any recommendations for reading material?

use it with guix package manager (so, read their manual)
right now the most useful application

Year of Guile Emacs when?

i bet they will try again when guile 3 comes out

Hopefully never.
An Emacs in Common Lisp would be unimaginably better. Also, Elisp is already closer to that rather than Scheme.

why do you argue commonlisp is better than scheme?

this gives me reason to stop using elisp for everything. booting up half of emacs just to run a script is starting to get slow when calling one script from another. you're okay, OP.

Because all the "bloat" people claim it has is actually useful and you reimplement half of it in any reasonably sized Scheme program anyway.
Plus, Lisp-2 > Lisp-1. Better organization, clearer code, and less name clashes.
It's also already more similar to Elisp (which, in fact, was influential in the design of Common Lisp) so the transition would be easier.
Don't get me wrong, I like Scheme. But for a real application which goes beyond a couple hundred lines (which Emacs clearly is) I see zero reason not to take advantage of a richer, even more powerful language.

Attached: 1510339152727.jpg (700x853, 69K)

Are you unironically using Emacs Lisp for anything outside of Emacs?

no, i'm unironically using emacs lisp for _everything_ outside of emacs. elisp is pretty great.

Ever thought about learning a "standalone" Lisp?

lisp 2 cant have multiprocessing

Just when you think this board can't get any dumber you come along.

Attached: 1476064892214.png (318x325, 183K)

i think about a lot of things i never do. it's probably for the best that way.