APOLOGIZE

You tell me.

Attached: 1526892227322.jpg (1228x1736, 432K)

Attached: sniffo.gif (492x519, 516K)

based mommy su

I've lived in Oregon my entire life. Not even as a kid did I thin PST means "pacifica northwest time". You're either retarded or a baitfag.

You've already lost the game. Give up.

So it's barely (2%) faster than AMD's previous chip and you expect it to do anything to Intel?

Attached: 1539237186694.png (400x400, 13K)

What's intel's current $99 offering? Whatever it is, it's about to be absolutely annihilated into a state of total irrelevancy, just like the rest of the blue time lineup.

Attached: 1473886769526.jpg (358x358, 14K)

lmao who are you people

no ice lake gonna 50% faster than zen 2

Attached: chrome_7sdb0ncylw.png (743x807, 71K)

Attached: the power of christ compels you.jpg (600x678, 42K)

I wonder how piednoel will be doing this week

Doesn't matter how good 10nm might be if their yields are too bad to make anything better than a quad core

>What's Inturd's current 100$ offering? Whatever it is, it's about to be absolutely annihilated
Kekus maximalmimums:

Attached: INTURD IS GARBAGE.jpg (1014x1680, 736K)

Oh God he thinks Icelake will have double digit IPC gains.

>tfw sitting comfy on my Zen+ 2600(not even X) and able to play any proton game at above 60+ fps at 1440p.

Where do "gamers" even use all of their performance?
Maybe it's because I haven't used windows in 6 years?

>wccftech
you fuckers never learn

Attached: bait.webm (1075x600, 2.9M)

How is it there, in 2017?

oy vey, call AIPAC, alert the elders, OP can't get away with this

BASED TAIKI BTFOING INTEL

mommy?

I think shintel is fucked for real this time.. they have no answer to this

Looks fake as fuck.
Same niggers believe in Navi with rtx2080 specs for 99 usd.

Attached: 1557120118557.png (1280x849, 103K)

What's the last arch with double digit IPC gains, Ivy?

It sucks to be 2700X owner right now. Spending $300+ just to be beaten by next gen budget tier CPU..

Those are $200+ CPUs. What is Intel's current $99 offerings?

Sure, i will remind this you later when it will be proved to be fake.
Zen 2 increase will be something like 10-20%.

You're missing on the point here:

Attached: 1558404780229.png (1911x931, 439K)

Coffee Lake*

* Only on SYSmark and Intel sponsored benchmarks

what anime

>crypto acceleration block
finally

Based and Gravity Fallspilled.

huh? that's nothing new at all
even microcontrollers have cryptographic acceleration these days

You're missing reading comprehension.

>You're missing on the point

Are those scores before or after patching all the vulnerabilities.

Attached: 1558391881544.png (408x1266, 101K)

Fake as fuck, no way it has a higher multiscore with less cores.
Why are you retards falling for this shit?

fake and ghey. i am not even an intel fan.

Attached: 1533977391463.png (1196x676, 1.05M)

Sure, kid, sure:

Attached: 1558209503053.png (600x389, 24K)

Good argument homo, how about you grace us with some more of that insightful knowledge and wisdom you got there.

Attached: AYF.png (500x375, 1.07M)

Ok kid

>$100
I doubt AMD is going to sell that much performance for $100.

QUICK GOYIM OC THE 9900K TO 6GHZ AHAHHAHAAAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAHAAHAHAHAHAH

Attached: 205af7691b98b54bac4c566fa9a13f146f820541c77ca7976c44988bc3f54d2f.png (800x618, 937K)

Pls don't kill yourself when AMD disappoints yet again.

OVERCLOCK IT to 6NIGGAHURTZ
MOAAAAAAAAAAR GIGAHURTZZZZZZZ
(Don't forget the chiller btw)

Attached: a4513i0.jpg (185x149, 9K)

Same here. I get 60fps on most games at 1440p with my 1070. The only upgrade I will need anytime soon will be to a 1080ti. I can buy new ryzen in a few years when it's cheap, so my current mobo will last me close to ten years, probably.

>Upgrading within the same gen
Top cuck.

>top cuck

I bet you buy brand new gpus lmao.

Attached: DED.png (370x339, 983K)

Ok kid

No I bought a 1080ti last year for $500 after the RTX announcement and that was my upgrade from a 980 ti.

Attached: CnrRmF3W8AA84QA.jpg (720x757, 62K)

Seems to be some errors in yours too:
>1. 2700x boosts to 4.3 not 4.2
>2. You're comparing the score from 2600x.

The correct number is 10.5%, which my way of calculating should have resulted in as well, I must have entered the wrong numbers somewhere too.

I just "overclocked" the 3300 score to 4.3 Ghz and compared the difference between it and the 2700x.

>5061 / 4 * 4.3 = 5440.575.
>(5440.575 - 4923) / 4923 = 10.5%

So in gaming performance the 3700x should end up at like 2% below the 9900k in gaming performance, maybe higher than that in titles that can take advantage of many cores. 13% IPC gain is required to straight out beat it.

Attached: 1558827100693.png (629x488, 20K)

No 16c at launch.
R5 3600- 6C 12T

R5 3600X- 6C 12T

R7 3700- 8C 16T

R7 3700X- 8C 16T

R7 3800X- 12C 24T

Ok kid

>leaks

go be dumb on /v/

This Intbecile completely broke down, please brin in the next one.

Ok kid

So for anyone curious how I arrived at 12% (13 was me misremembering):

These are normalized scores of benchmarks in games. If 9700k (not 9900k, sorry) is 100, then 2700x is 77. With a 5Ghz clock, it becomes 77 * (5 / 4.3) = 89.53. To reach 100, you need to multiply with an IPC gain of 1.117, almost 12%.

Attached: Untitled.png (928x259, 28K)

nice blog

Jewtel jizz tim pozzed 14nm+++++++++++++ housefire ring -3 rootkit delidded lapped chiller AIDS speed holes israel botnet
>Jewtel jizz tim pozzed 14nm+++++++++++++ housefire ring -3 rootkit delidded lapped chiller AIDS speed holes israel botnet
Jewtel jizz tim pozzed 14nm+++++++++++++ housefire ring -3 rootkit delidded lapped chiller AIDS speed holes israel botnet
>Jewtel jizz tim pozzed 14nm+++++++++++++ housefire ring -3 rootkit delidded lapped chiller AIDS speed holes israel botnet

A leaker on resetera is now claiming the adoredtv lineup is wrong, 3800x is the 12 core chip, and Ryzen 5 will stay at 6 cores.

old.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/bt7eae/user_on_resetera_claims_that_the_press_know_the/

Who's right?

Attached: 1483406568843.jpg (552x661, 71K)

adored always said the branding could be subject to change

Go back you retarded autist.

Attached: 1535198252376.png (388x447, 10K)

newer info is more likely to be accurate, so adored's is likelier to be wrong

Then here's the newst info:

>Ryzen 11: 3980x - 24c/48t - 5.4 Ghz. Launches at 200 USD.

retard

Stop making AI-generated shitposts.

>ADORED BTFO THE RYZEN 3 IS ACTUALLY CALLED A RYZEN 5
I mean, okay. Call me when the 12/16 core units get scrapped or the final boost frequencies are confirmed to be sub 4.5.

Not gonna lie though I'll be kinda disappointed if they didn't name the 6 core SKU Ryzen 3, regardless of its pricing or the performance. It's just a giant missed marketing opportunity.

With less than 12 hours to spare this speculation is useless and a waste of energy. I WILL receive the 8 or 12 core cpu regardless, just based off of the demo months ago. It beat a 9900k pre mitigations. Intel will not return to premitigation performance for at least another 2 years

Jow Forumsentoomen in my area?
OwO

Screencap this

>resetera
Дaльшe мoжнo нe читaть. Oбoccaн.

Can somebody explain to me the 4D chess move of AMD refusing to announce or acknowledge the existence of 12 core chips at CES and now the 16 core ones at Computex? Are they not confident that they can deliver them at all because of poor yields? Do they want to psyche out Intel by hiding their most powerful lineup and making the blue jew pool its resources into competing with something that isn't actually the flagship CPU? Do they want to milk Threadripper sales and get rid of their remaining stock?

Who gives a shit what the branding is? Whether any particular model is called an R3, R5, R7 or TO doesn't matter. How it performs and how it's priced are what matter.

Actually, the 8-core being the 3700 and 3700x would likely be bad news for Intel since it means AMD can give the x version a 105w TDP rather than the 95w TDP it would have to have if branded as the 3600.

Same goes for the 6-core. 3600x branding means it can have a 95w TDP.

that's at least a $200 CPU at launch
you know it to be true.

Lisa Su is great at being cautious.

Does it mean it's optimized for bitcoins?

Attached: ugly.png (480x586, 134K)

>Are they not confident that they can deliver them at all because of poor yields?
No, they're simply hiding them because of low clocks
Something went wrong

twitter.com/TUM_APISAK/status/1132660727993364480

Another leak confirming that Ryzen 5 will be 6 cores.

3000 ryzen not until e3 goys, thats just announcement. inb4 sept release

youtube.com/watch?v=PEAVSAoC_Tg

OH NONONONONONO

That makes no sense. It would be utterly bizzare for AMD to use a keynote at Computex to talk about a chipset for a CPU they haven't launched, and to talk about a GPU when they have a gaming focused event already scheduled for E3, and then to use the gaming focused event to launch CPUs but not GPUs?

Why would Puget Systems already have a 3600 then? Why would multiple people be claiming tech press already had the line-up info?

It makes no sense.

r3 4
r5 6
r7 8
r9 12

>it goes to eleven marketing
r11 16

6 cores at 4.8ghz, ill take it

4.5GHz max on their best chip.