after years of engineering, is javascript really that bad as a language as Jow Forums said so?
inb4
>[compile-to-js language]
>[framework of the week]
i am talking about vanilla javascript, and only plain javascript, without third party libraries
after years of engineering, is javascript really that bad as a language as Jow Forums said so?
inb4
>[compile-to-js language]
>[framework of the week]
i am talking about vanilla javascript, and only plain javascript, without third party libraries
Other urls found in this thread:
dev.to
twitter.com
They need to add a null safe deferencing operator. Other than that it is complete.
It's better and faster than python
Coupled with Typescript (larger projects)(transpiles to Javascript)
I prefer Guile tho
All languages with dynamic typing are inherently cursed. The only reason they are used at all is for the """ecosystem"""
It's a very good language, but it is Lisp derived, so braindead guys don't know how to JS.
It is no more Lisp derived than Java.
forgive him Lord
Python is more readable and has a far better standard library, and Java is more performant and also has a far better standard library.
>so braindead guys don't know how to JS
Theres nothing worse than python. Bottom of the barrel language.