wccftech.com
>"During their Computex demo, AMD benchmarked the 8 core, 16 thread Ryzen 7 3700X against the Intel Core i7-9700K, an 8 core and 8 thread processor. The processor is said to feature a TDP of just 65W and has clock speeds of 3.8 GHz base and 4.6 GHz boost which is an exceptional improvement over the Ryzen 7 parts which boosted up to 4.35 GHz."
>Their 8c/16t only competes with Intel 8c/8t
AMD fucking blew their ONE chance to jump ahead of Intel.
I'm unsubbing from that scottish retard right now. This is just another rather unexciting, iterative upgrade. Not even close to the 'revolution' that 7nm was supposed to provide.
The best part is that intel are so fucked beyond belief that even this disappointment will still leave amd as the better option, particularly at the 3 and 5 lines.
I miss the early 2000s...
Basically my thoughts. I was excited to finally have a reason to jump the IntelAviv ship but instead we get this bullshit disappointment.
Fuck you Lisa Su.
so where does athlon fit in the line up?
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>shows multithreaded CB only against 8 cores and 8 threads
LMAO
AMD COPE
I knew something was off when Intel announced a 10-core Comet Lake, fake news AMDtard TV kept peddling 16-cores
>use HT on intel
>get hacked and locked out of your system
>pay up all you buttcoins
nope
He literally got everything right you jewish shill. R9 12 core boosts up to 4.6GHz without even counting XFR, consumes less and is faster than Shintels 12 core at less than half the price.
>consumes less
We don't know the power draw at full load you AMDrone. Nothing either company says can be trusted when it comes to power because they never actually show full load power. TDP spec is literally worthless.
We were supposed to get 2 more cores at the 3 and 5 lines you retard, that was the biggest most exciting part of the whole rumour.
>I literally have no idea what TDP is
(lol
I'm kind've sad that the 3600 is only 6c/12t. It just means my next CPU upgrade will be lightyears away.
What's the problem? You guys just spent the last two weeks telling us hyperthreading doesn't matter
He got everything right except for being $200 off and the 4 cpus that don't exist
*inhales*
Yeah, I'm on a i5 4690 and I've been waiting a while for this. I'm now kinda thinking it wasn't worth it and I should've just gone 2600X last year...
early 2000s will never happen untill we get beyond silicon waffer. technology has periods. this is the transition stage
Did you miss the part where the 3700 is cheaper than the 9700
>what is price category
is it AMD s fault that INTEL prices their shitty 9700k 399 $ while AMD has an 8c/8t in the same price range ? fucking shintel tard
IDF at full force.
Who else is /comfy/ holding AMD stock right now?
>comparing stock TDP with actual drawn power during full loads
You didn't need the meme arrow there champ, we can tell you have no idea what TDP is
I'm on a 4670k and thinking the same thing.
>In which I pretend to forget that the 9700k is a 95w TDP cpu and the 9900k is a (((95w TDP))) CPU, (but actually way more with MCE on) and the 3700x is a 65w TDP part.
(You)
>holding AMD stock
>during a trade war
RIP
NOOOO DELID THIS I CAN'T BE LAID OFF FROM INTEL
>Their 8c/16t only competes with Intel 8c/8t
See Their cheapest 8c/16t competes with the 9900k in performance while being cheaper than the 9700k and drawing less power than the 9600k.
Idiot
Intel is död