>14nm 8c16t 9900k matches AMD's 7nm 8c16t CPU
14nm 8c16t 9900k matches AMD's 7nm 8c16t CPU
Kevin Anderson
Liam Moore
65w versus house fire
Carson Clark
>Cheaper
>Consumes less
???
Daniel Howard
reasonable price vs overpriced blue bullshit
Bentley Wilson
you mean
>top amd comsumer 8 core beats top intel consumer 8 core at 200$ less
and
>amd consumer 12 core beats intel hedt 12 core at 1/3 of its price
Samuel Long
>PRICES DON'T MATTER
Adrian Robinson
>Intel's 10nm process is completely fucked, stranding them on 14nm for years and years
>this is somehow AMD's problem
Luis James
Where are all the shills and bots that keep claiming 5Ghz and 16-cores?
Jeremiah Lewis
(lol
Colton Walker
FOR HALF THE PRICE AND POWER
Mason Young
>Intel's $500 125w 9900k, loses to $350 mid tier chip from AMD, also it's 65watts
Leo Moore
I really hope the 3900x has the promised single threaded performance shown here.
Charles Lewis
Shhhh. You hear that? That's the sound of hundreds of paid and volunteer intel shills moving hundreds of goal posts in the wake of the greatest reckoning since Jesus cleared the temple.
Lincoln Brooks
AMDUMBS BTFO
Matthew Johnson
>8c16t 9900k
You've meant 8c/8t 9700K after the HT-disabling (((mitigations))), Jude.
Joshua Hill
>15% more IPC
>65 watts
>69% more performance
>I-I-it literally doesn't matter goy
*yawn* gas yourself already pathetic kike
Jason Gonzalez
fpbp
Juan Jenkins
based
Evan Russell
yeah but for the same price i can get a lot more cores and functional SMT
Asher Perez
THAT FUCKING GAY ASS RETARD THAT POSTED HIS HWINFO SCREENSHOT 24/7 WILL FINALLY STFU
Carson Hughes
>i9 9900k
Xavier Adams
How much you wanna bet thats without all the new security patches enabled