OVERCLOCKED RYZEN 9 3920x-3950x DEMO AT AMD CLOSED EVENT

And why should I buy this new shit when 1600s are $80 and 1700Xs are $120? As if I'm paying $300 for a CPU.

Attached: 1327016254967.gif (360x240, 1.98M)

Get GPU pass through sorted out and my 3dcad is going to be so fast.

That's fucking fantastic. That's how much the i9-9900K takes on at 5GHz

Don't be a poorfag, the Inteliites are already laughing at us

BASED AMD MAKING CPU CHEAP AGAIN!

sure is. 4.5Ghz all core at sane level of voltages or rather for 24/7 usage would be perfect.

7nm isnt 14 divided by 2, but AMD actually managed to pack 16c/32t into the engineering sample and the same power consumption specs as Intel's 8c/16t

>RYZEN 9 3920x-3950x
If those model numbers are for Ryzen, does that meam no Threadripper this time around?

Threadripper Mk3 delayed, not dead.

They can always just pack more cores into it.

Like all enthusiast platform stuff new TR is going to take some time
There isn't exactly a whole hoard of people waiting in line for TR

thats still a good thing user

>still not 5GHz

NO THIS WAS OUR YEAR

Attached: 1497910377702.jpg (568x612, 66K)

>bro what's an ipc

>poorfag
No just working long-term memory. 5 years ago people would call you a fucking retard if you spent $300-$500 on CPU and $1000 on GPU.

Attached: standing gabus.png (642x817, 248K)

Go back 20 years ago and people didn't scoff if you bought a $500 CPU and $1000 GPU, infact it wasn't all that uncommon
Your long term memory is kinda short

this, ~twice the multi-core performance for the same power consumption on a fucking early engineering sample is pretty based.

Attached: aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS9DLzkvODA1MjU3L29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDA3LnBuZw==(1).jpg (755x561, 109K)

I doubt it. Back then nobody I knew owned computers that expensive. I was using a beige box that cost about $500 total. Electronics ballooning to ludicrous prices and people actually buying them is a recent trend.

Im getting an Athlon 200ge with a b450 just to tide me over until 3000 series APUs come out. No gaymes just W10 host and Udindu in Virtualbox

>it's like a 7% difference in performance
>there's likely going to be a 4.8 GHz SKU later on
>7nm+ EUV is coming
Tbh I'm still kind of let down, even though I know it's stupid. I just really want to see the number 5 when I start up my computer and look at the frequencies.

Watts (more is better)

PBO/XFR will get you there, probably

It's not the same without seeing AMD RYZEN @ 5000MHz DDR4-5000 in the BIOS.

>Windows 8

Attached: doubt - better version.jpg (707x299, 36K)

based autist

x370 Taichi would definitely handle the 3900x, but what of a 16 core? That shit looks very hungry.

Attached: 1557093370095.png (528x599, 230K)

My thoughts exactly. The money still goes to AMD though. People w/ enough pockets will go for new. Meanwhile, people still have options for less. The power/heat savings are the selling points IMO.

threadripper has always came out delayed for obvious reasons. Lisa Su indicated in an after-session interview that ofc new gen threadripper is coming.

what idle power draw should I expect from machine with this CPU?

>Industrial Chillers (More is better)

You're a retard. Let's go back, oh, twelve years to 2007. Oh look, top dog CPUs like the QX6850 going for $999.

Graphics cards? The 8800 Ultra and GTX 8800. $800+ and $600+ respectively.

You have to be 18 to post here

>novidia and intel example.
no fucking way. you just posted about the asian and the literal jew.

Fuck off

>10 watts more than a 2700x at 4.25

that seems off

>16 core, 32 thread, 4.25 GHz
>probably less than $800

Attached: over and over.gif (400x300, 332K)

twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/1133044083772088322
Big if true.

They're doing Zen2+, aren't they? Goddammit, put some more pressure on Intel, they have a lot of shekels and will eventually fight back.
On another note, now I'm not even sure if I buy a 3900x. Zen + DDR5 should be the next upgrade after that desu.

Radeon 9700 and Ti 4600 etc we're 300-400

Intel and AMD both hit the $999 bar with their EE/64FX line

Saving their big guns for their anniversary

Silly zoomer, nobody bought a QX6850. It was the Q6600 for 530 USD that sold (and even then most people chose the far cheaper E6600 or E6750. And the 8800 Ultra was mocked by everyone, it was the gpu for rich idiots. Even the gtx 8800 was seen as too expensive, it was the GTS 8800 that first sold, and when later overshadowed by the 8800 GT that sold like crazy for it's insanly good price of 250 dollar.

>Just Wait™ forever

You people are gullible as fuck

If it is athlon branded 16c I will cum in my pants.

With 6nm tsmc being a free transition it's no brainer to go for the next gen if it brings some frequency and efficiency gains even if you don't use the area scaling gains. Just like gf's 12nm was to 14nm.
Amd can't afford to go with totally new designs or fab processes each year, see how staggered the graphics card launches have been. Intel's coffee lake has only been two new designs so far (6core and 8core) and it looks like the next generation is only two more (6core and 10cores with 2/4cores on 10nm).

Please give me a link. I want to upgrade my gen1 threadripper.

It's over Intcel bros...

Attached: 1543575875071.png (682x792, 339K)

i didn't even remember that the i9 was this housefire

They can just come up wit ha different naming scheme for TR, what's the problem. After all the only relevant TRs from now on will be 24c and 32c ones (or more, who knows).

TR is ded, 16 cores with that IPC are probably enough for almost everything, also ryzen 3000 support up to 128gb of ram (incel on mainstream only supports 64gb)

Aren't they using N7+ for Zen 3? N6 ("6nm") is a different thing.

But mommy said they'll make (new) threadripper for the people who want it anyway

>Su did not elaborate on the why the processors went missing from the roadmap, or when the company will bring the next-gen models to market, saying "I don't think that we ever said Threadripper was not going to continue, it somehow took on a life of its own on the internet. You will see more Threadrippers from us. You will definitely see more Threadrippers from us."
It's coming, calm your shit. They literally can't pump out enough chiplets to meet the demand at this point.

Vague roadmaps like those old ones are likely to change. No one knew n6 existed back then and you can reuse n7 masks on it as well making it a very easy transition.
So n7 and n6 are very similar and n7+ might be more difficult to use. If amd can reuse mask they can make zen2+ cheaply, get performance improvements and release a consumer product on time next year instead of delaying it for months then epyc3 can wait until zen3 for real generational improvements.

can't do 32+ cores or 60pcie lanes though, hedt/workstation is here to stay but I do think you're right that it's being encroached upon by ryzen. Probably why they never enabled am4 to use all 32pcie lanes.

The other part of the equation is the IO dies and assembly costs. I don't doubt it's very cheap to physically manufacture and thread ripper is the only place to send IO dies that have certain mpio or memory controllers that are faulty.

>demoralization shillposts
The consumer friendly company offers the unanimously superior product and suddenly performance price TDP ICP nothing matters and we should all buy the cheapest product? Lmao no thanks, I'll be buying that 3700X feinstein

Attached: 1549179203490.jpg (1529x1337, 491K)

So like why any of you here need this for shitposting on a basket weaving forum? FF eats ram not CPU cycles.

Attached: 1558933563902.jpg (240x241, 23K)

>Inb4 Athlon 64c(ores)

IPC doesn't matter

Housefires don't matter

Blender doesn't matter