5 Ghz, huh?

>NUH UH IT HAS TO BE 5GHZ BECAUSE SOME GUY SAID SO

oh my sweet summer child.

I always said 5ghz was a substancial psychological barrier. I'm bummed they didn't get there but because I was anticipating shitposting exactly on this level, not because of the overall "lack of" performance. Repeat, for marketing and public perception much more than for technical benefits.

>AMD is still 8-15% slower
This is bait, I hope? I fucking hope no one is actually retarded enough to claim this after being shown a 3800x matching the 9900k in single threaded performance in Cinebench R20 while the 3800x is at significantly lower clocks.

Attached: inteliskill.jpg (2053x1025, 220K)

Imagine the disaster if it cant even overclock to 5ghz on air.

>believing a mongolian basket weaving forum

Attached: 1545601857290.jpg (638x1000, 82K)

One note about Cinebench R20 is Intel came to Maxton to add support for some ray tracing bull which made Intel scores go up all across the board

"Ghz" doesn't matter, at all, it's completely irrelevant
Only when you use Ghz in a formula with IPC and other things, does it start to matter.
Notice bulldozer has the highest clocks.

Who said it s not possible? We don t even know how good they OC , they are using TSMC now , so it might be easily Overclockable to 5ghz

yeah this forum is full of mouthbreathers nobody with more than a third of a working brain ever thought 5 ghz was going to happen