How many more security flaws is Intel hiding?

How many more security flaws is Intel hiding?

Attached: zombieload-name.png (800x568, 74K)

0

1

0

1

1

1

I dont think all nsa backdoors have been elucidated yet. Why does the ghost have a stick? Isnttthe ghost scary enough? Does he not realize that?

010111 = 23 hidden security flaws

What I want to know is who the fuck comes up with the names for these vulnerabilities.
Why is it called Spectre?
Why Meltdown?
Why Zombieload?
Why Fallout?
Who is in charge of the names?
I want to name one.
Name one SUPerProlapse

this

can I stop zombieload or any of these not mitigated by disabling hyperthreading?

Yes

1

2

Thats not a binary number

Did they patch the fiware yet?

Millions at least.

it's a trinary number
what's your point?

Its a branch. Spectre was an exploit in the branch predictor.

Probably a few, they knew about MDS in June last year.
The real question isn't how many are they hiding, it's how many do they not even yet know about.

At least I can use Adobe Premiere.

> (((flaws)))

Precisely

we need amd sponsored engineers to work harder to find them all

based

Mommy milkies

Attached: COMPUTEX_2019_KEYNOTE_052719_FINAL-page-013_575px.jpg (678x181, 23K)

the question is how many is AMD hiding?

Nobody has bothered to dig really deep with AMD yet.

Took them a decade to find out all the security flaws on Intel chips, it'll take the same for AMD ones.

thanks user

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-28_02-10-24.png (1920x1080, 834K)

6 gorillion

Intel flaws were discovered in 2007, so wait like 10+ years when PCs probably don't even exist anymore lol

How many more exploits do the chinks over at AMD know about that they are holding onto when Intel becomes more threatening again?

Attached: images.jpg (256x256, 25K)

Does a benchmark with all the security mitigations exist for an Intel CPU? Like fully patched against not patched at all.
All I find are benchmarks about specific flaws.

>Does a benchmark with all the security mitigations exist for an Intel CPU?
oy veyyyyyyyyyyy

>How many more security flaws is Intel creating?
ftfy

didn't patch anything
didn't see any proof of concepts exploiting a normal webbrowser with basic javascript.

Do you expect hackers to make an announcement or something?

Ignorance is bliss

>intel
>treatening

i thought it was already dead

expect that for every patch 3 new ones are created
make numbers

Planned obsolescence lmoa

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 139K)

With multiple variants of spectre, foreshadow, ridl etc. spectre-meltdown-checker now checks for 12 CVEs and their mitigations.
>for now. List keeps growing.

Attached: CopyQ.NSCQgp.png (829x46, 6K)

How do you know it's not little endian?

When even the ones that create the proofs can not show off how this really is a security risk then I am going to ignore it. That my host can read what happens in my VM is something I would not say is a security-risk. The other way around is scary but only for serverhosters.
If there would be a security hole in the javascript engine then this would be known pretty fast.

The real question is how many flaws will be exposed once AMD has a decent market share

1 little
10 little
11 little endians

>trinary
It's ternary brainlet

terrynary, holy trinity confirmed