>18% IPC improvement over 2015's skylake
>up to 4 cores
Are they actually fucking dead Jow Forums?
18% IPC improvement over 2015's skylake
Lincoln Butler
William Young
they say 15% improvement IPC every single gen.
they moved maybe 10% since ivy bridge in reality.
Isaiah Barnes
Not falling for this shit again. The benchmarks probably exercise some instruction extensions that no one uses.
Zachary Parker
>18% IPC improvement
At least they're finally doing something, coffee lake was a regression in performance.
Jordan Davis
>software and workloads may have been optimized for performance on intel microprocessors only
Brody Murphy
Not even worth considering Intel IPC gains until 2021 at earliest. They are far too behind at this point.
Eli Lopez
>18% IPC
>40% more security holes
>30% lower clocks
Julian Perez
That's not all.
>and may not reflect all publicly available security updates.
Imagine not reading any of this and falling for Intel's bait. Then getting your mitigations all up in your grill.
Joseph Parker
Fucking state of intlel
Alexander Foster
Their clocks dropped by 20% to compensate, lmao.
Eli Wilson
Intel have redefined what "IPC" means to them after failing to actually increase IPC for several generations.
They no-longer mean instructions per clock, but instructions per second. Which they raise by increasing clock speeds.
Jaxson Lopez
>may not reflect all publicly available security updates
John Smith
Intel is a mess.. how does a company with total monopoly goes to shit in a few years? What went wrong?
Austin Jenkins
complacency, boneheaded decisions
Wyatt Long
400 billion diversity dollars
Jayden Lopez
The free market works. When the leader falls behind, it gets punished.
Brayden Parker
>that entire disclaimer at the bottom
Bentley Hill
Unless you're using a server the vulnerabilities don't matter for the average person. No real reason to include them in real world benchmarks. Intel still leads vs. AMD even with the patches...
Jack Wilson
>SECURITY VULNERABILITIES ARE FINE GUISE!
holy fucking denial
Nolan Sullivan
>may not reflect all publicly available security updates
fucking kek intel is fucking done
Jayden Anderson
I mean, i'm all for IPC gains even though they dont matter that much to me but why are they comparing to skylake?
Jeremiah Nguyen
That's exactly what they did, the whole stream was about their new """"AI"""" instructions.
Isaac Morgan
> Write workarounds for previous chips that cripple performance
> Fix the next architecture so it doesn't need to be crippled
> Compare old CPU with performance crippling workarounds to new CPUs that don't need it
> Hey everyone, we increased IPC!
Robert Thomas
Intel is definitely focusing on their strengths with ice lake mobile. AMD will probably still have trouble competing in the laptop space. Seems like a good decision focusing the initial 10nm runs there. Maybe late 2020 they can compete on the desktop again.
Cameron Diaz
It's exactly what it lools, like they want to make the difference seem bigger than it is, NVIDIA did it with the GTX 950 by comparing it with the GTX 650 instead of the GTX 750, it's just Jews being Jews.
Charles Morris
AVX-512 on a laptop seems stupid and wasteful though. I can see why they would want it to be available everywhere but it can't be an efficient use of die area and power.
Wyatt Butler
>uses AVX-512
>clocks go as low as 1.6GHz
Leo Moore
AMD is better at doing work more energy efficiently, and the only place where Intel still has any edge in is in idle power consumption (what most laptops do most of the time). Movable workstation and "gaming" type laptops will move over to AMD, while Intel can hold onto ultra mobile and mobile laptop segments for few more years.
Juan Fisher
They have no 7nm chips on mobile until next year. Running mobile parts and APUs almost a generation behind the desktop chips is becoming a problem.
Anthony Rivera
>18% IPC IMPORVMENT
>If you don't use security patches
>We used testing IntelC++
So its, not 18% at all? Good to know rabbi.
Justin Walker
IceLake-U seems nice, but good luck getting one with reasonable pricing, made even worse by its limited availability. Dell just announced a dual core + 4GB RAM laptop (albeit in a "premium" chassis) for $1000 FFS. Now Intel is going to jew the market even more by justifying it with the Project Athena bullshit. Yeah right, literally pay Intel for the certification that says "yep, this laptop is not shit"
Ethan Torres
no it's not. Both Vega and Ryzen are extremely good at lower ends of the frequency spectrum.
3700U is only 15W with Vega 10 and 4 core CPU
Kevin Clark
no real time benchmarks
no security patches
no physical desktop silicon
no sunny cove 10-core or greater coming to desktops this year, and I would be surprised if it even came next year
Josiah Perez
Getting on a new process 6+ months earlier than the competition is exactly the same advantage AMD has on the desktop right now. We'll see how the availability is though. They might still have very limited production.
Ryder Cruz
>up to 4 cores
lul
Leo Scott
Now show us the required cooling solution, Shlomo.
Brody Ward
John Gutierrez
they need to fix their exploits or they need a 85% IPC improvement
Ian White
>spec 2016
>spec 2017
>sysmark 2014
>webxprt
>r15
so basicly the tested every single program that was optimised with intel compiler and as they state below they probably dont have any mitigation on
good luck intel