Those are irrelevant, AMD beats the 9900k in all scenarios while using a 40% of the power, that's impressive.
Anthony Baker
>But Zen 2 sucks because it can't do 5ghz, right shills? Those shills are also unduly assuming that TSMC 7nm HPC has the same voltage scaling as GF 14nm LPP, and that Zen 2 won't have any overclocking headroom as a result. There is no good reason to assume the voltage scaling will be identical, and we should wait to see how Ryzen 3000 overclocks before even entertaining silly arguments about 'muh niggahurtz'.
Dylan Bennett
>gain the upper hand on AVX2 floating point loaded code >must mean better IPC and performance all around
Cooper Jones
SOPA MACACO can't read.
Chase Rodriguez
>Shills actually trying to argue Zen 2 doesn't have better IPC when Ryzen 3000 CPUs beat the 9900k in Cinebench R20 single threaded at lower clocks. Lmoa
>on par or better single threaded performance According to what their selected benchmarks? That pubg gameplay and strange Brigade was handpicked embarrassment. I still think it won't beat 9900k maybe in few titles on that 12 core CPU.
Chase Gomez
>what is xfr ever since they introduced that shit, old school overclocking was made pretty much irrelevant. Every chip boosts itself to its limit based on the cooler's efficiency. If a chip's xfr range is specified at X GHz, you won't be able to overclock much further either. 100 MHz tops. Out of the currently announced lineup not one cpu will reach 5ghz on air. Kinda sucks desu because this way amds offering will be just "better" instead of the literal shoah amdronedtv hyped up for months.
Matthew Fisher
>The newest version of the industry standard Cinebench benchmark isn't representative of actual performance even though the whole industry uses Cinebench for benchmarking (lol