So let's recap

So let's recap

AMD now has

>best IPC
>on par or better single threaded performance
>best multi threaded performance
>best price to performance ratio

Also remember that if it wasn't for AMD you'd still be buying $300 4 core 4 thread CPUs. But Zen 2 sucks because it can't do 5ghz, right shills?

Attached: 2019-01-09-image-34.jpg (2048x1445, 150K)

Other urls found in this thread:

anandtech.com/show/14419/amd-confirms-zen-4-epyc-codename-and-elaborates-frontier-cpu
youtube.com/watch?v=rhA_DbxfBsg
tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review,5571-11.html
twitter.com/Cat_Merc/status/1133337499558928385
jedec.org/document_search?search_api_views_fulltext=jesd79-4 ddr4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR4_SDRAM#JEDEC_standard_DDR4_module
realworldtech.com/forum/?threadid=184972&curpostid=184998
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR4_SDRAM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Those are irrelevant, AMD beats the 9900k in all scenarios while using a 40% of the power, that's impressive.

>But Zen 2 sucks because it can't do 5ghz, right shills?
Those shills are also unduly assuming that TSMC 7nm HPC has the same voltage scaling as GF 14nm LPP, and that Zen 2 won't have any overclocking headroom as a result. There is no good reason to assume the voltage scaling will be identical, and we should wait to see how Ryzen 3000 overclocks before even entertaining silly arguments about 'muh niggahurtz'.

>gain the upper hand on AVX2 floating point loaded code
>must mean better IPC and performance all around

SOPA MACACO can't read.

>Shills actually trying to argue Zen 2 doesn't have better IPC when Ryzen 3000 CPUs beat the 9900k in Cinebench R20 single threaded at lower clocks.
Lmoa

Attached: inteliskill.jpg (2053x1025, 220K)

>on par or better single threaded performance
According to what their selected benchmarks?
That pubg gameplay and strange Brigade was handpicked embarrassment.
I still think it won't beat 9900k maybe in few titles on that 12 core CPU.

>what is xfr
ever since they introduced that shit, old school overclocking was made pretty much irrelevant. Every chip boosts itself to its limit based on the cooler's efficiency. If a chip's xfr range is specified at X GHz, you won't be able to overclock much further either. 100 MHz tops.
Out of the currently announced lineup not one cpu will reach 5ghz on air. Kinda sucks desu because this way amds offering will be just "better" instead of the literal shoah amdronedtv hyped up for months.

>The newest version of the industry standard Cinebench benchmark isn't representative of actual performance even though the whole industry uses Cinebench for benchmarking
(lol

Meanwhile, at Intel...

Attached: Fine print.jpg (1200x255, 231K)