Jow Forums Humor

Attached: 1558946089649.png (801x1500, 1.05M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RZp7BvQJnU8&t=47s
surejob.in/average-salary-in-india.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

hahaha itodlers btfo
intel ded, amd wins
huawei yes! nevermind it's chinkshit
gentooooooooo
apple go to /lgbt/ lmao

Attached: 1558870819860.png (500x500, 22K)

Attached: 1558899455041.jpg (720x1348, 188K)

are you ok?

Attached: 1558900965102.jpg (1920x1080, 255K)

install zentoo

He just has a breakdown from spending too much time here. Don't worry, he will get better

>He

Wait, DID I JUST ASSUME THEIR GENDER?!

you're supposed to post some humour, not making something people will save and post in next threads man

Attached: 1541246183696.jpg (480x247, 12K)

who is this cutie

Attached: Es0Gvnp.png (5098x1500, 2.29M)

>haha look at me!! The biggest intelcuck on board and i trol adm-pajjets! Haha!

You not funny, fag.

Attached: giantBug.png (461x660, 62K)

>AMD

Attached: wx5100.png (513x108, 6K)

Attached: 1529286260639.png (484x402, 17K)

Attached: intlel.webm (736x416, 1.96M)

>angry whirring intensifies

What?

i'm learning java, should i be worried?

>SU
Seething tranny

The blue one from Steven universe

Pajeet code monkey student here. Java initializes a pool of Integer objects up to some number less than 1000 (128 I think). Assigning two Integer objects the int value 100 directly will result in 2 references to the same object, == compares references on objects, therefore a100 == b100 is true. For values larger than those in the pre-initialized pool, Java creates a unique object every time with autoboxing magic. Thus, a1000 and b1000 are different Integer objects.

Attached: have-sex.jpg (1200x911, 128K)

Attached: 1553761615528.png (1200x1198, 1.31M)

Thank god I'm learning C++

OH, THEY'RE INT OBJECTS!

I missed that.

Attached: 1549044806464.png (1022x422, 655K)

Attached: 1545096031043.png (1040x750, 421K)

Attached: 1533332464969.png (883x1494, 284K)

lmao

incel

Attached: 1536248795354.jpg (640x344, 29K)

Attached: 1557301017063.jpg (640x480, 81K)

Attached: 1550169903444.jpg (1920x1080, 219K)

Attached: 1540659757823.png (793x233, 29K)

Attached: 1538418820115.jpg (766x772, 87K)

Attached: 1551301728743.png (947x839, 66K)

Attached: 1529823581585.jpg (640x361, 63K)

>if true==true, return false
Codelet here, dunno of it's the joke but it made me laugh

Attached: 1536800494599.jpg (1426x1600, 163K)

Attached: 1548049800979.png (1280x1092, 598K)

kek
integer programs are not linear though.

hahaha no way, that is some good shit

Attached: 1544041239485.png (1255x1403, 186K)

hahaha wtf

Attached: 1537229457119.jpg (2048x1536, 363K)

Amazing

That's one of many layers of retardation in that image.

The more you understand programming, web development, and basic security principles, the more horrified you'll be at that image.

Attached: 1536011791581.jpg (920x1162, 107K)

you mean if I buy the advance I can evolve to become an asian?
I'll take 20

The horrifying part is that if this code is real, it means the following:
- Anyone can run an arbitrary query against the SQL server
- The application stores passwords in plaintext
- Rather than querying for a specific user from the database, it iterates through all the users on the client side
- It pulls in all usernames and passwords to the user's browser, where they are all visible. You could see any user's login details
- The authentication is happening client side. You could easily set the "loggedin" cookie to "yes" yourself
Then of course there's all of the code style issues and bad practice.
Really, the only saving grace in my mind is that the "true" === "true" part is so retarded that it's probably fake.

Attached: 1545537206137.gif (834x870, 327K)

To log in you need to call a function authenticateUser. But actually you don't, you can simply set the cookie manually. But the biggest fuck up is the function itself - to log in it downloads the entire table of logins and passwords and then check whether there's a pair that matches what the user entered. All done on the client side. "true"==="true" is just a cherry on top.

I still remember when these fire jokes were reserved for Nvidia

how times have changed lol

This only happens with object types and not with primitives.

If you are comparing the values of two objects you should use either .equals() or .compareTo() which will return the expected output.

This about covers it, although it should be noted that a having a "loggedin=yes" cookie is effectively no security at all (a proper login cookie should have a token checked against a table on the server).

Attached: hackernews_pornhub_php.png (1067x355, 17K)

This has been making the rounds for a while now. Still gets me every time.

book name, onigai.

To me, the best part is the TODO line at the top. That will totally fix everything!

"true" === "true" might be the result of some refactoring. But yeah, it's not really credible.

Accurate.

Attached: Calc.jpg (640x516, 125K)

> if ("true" === "true") { return false; }

Attached: 49c133afa693fcddb839318ebe8ef7eda6ea555164c1c4cd89302a869decb5f7.jpg (359x347, 23K)

>Jow Forums humor

Attached: h739676C5.jpg (400x400, 27K)

>these advice dog edits that I used to hate evoke nostalgia now
fuck

Attached: beep.jpg (684x626, 93K)

Audiophiles are truly special
Lol

>"Advanced" turns out it was a bootleg copy with trojan botnet and all stats were faked by the government.

Attached: 502_bad_gateway.jpg (509x435, 37K)

Attached: what_are_cons_anyway.png (649x259, 14K)

Attached: virgin ssd vs chad hdd.jpg (1801x1339, 801K)

Attached: siri_wolfram_alpha_calculation.jpg (1420x2395, 457K)

Attached: FermiLiftoff.jpg (528x800, 37K)

Almost thought this was fun even though the joke is very poorly executed, then saw what a miserable and flaming tech-event macfag he is and it all made sense, I was trying vastly too hard to make it enjoyable.

Modern Compiler Implementation in C

youtube.com/watch?v=RZp7BvQJnU8&t=47s

based boomer, that ungrateful shit just lost a million in one chance.

This is a joke, right?

Attached: cnr.png (740x227, 30K)

That's still the Netburst block diagram next to the 9900KS.

so it's hate-oriented programming? is it /ourparadigm/ ?

this shouldn't be funny but it is

good old Mr.MEEE.... I still use his AWX repo

does anyone actually find xkcd funny

anyone have the one where some shill is standing next to a bar graph that has 1 and 2 on it with an mspain version of it

People who want to tell everyone that they are smart laugh out loud so people know they get the jokes

I did in highschool.

Attached: 1547063485171.jpg (752x548, 282K)

It's usually pretty good. That one in particular is great.

Great comic

but that "fraction of the cost" still better that the average wage by cleaning toilets

>Wages in India is expected to be 340.95 INR/Day by the end of this quarter, according to Trading Economics global macro models and analysts expectations. In the long-term, the India Average Daily Wage Rate is projected to trend around 372.33 INR/Day in 2020, according to our econometric models.

>The average salary in India is around $295 to $300 . Although the amount is very less compared to the west but it is still rising and that is a good thing.
>Average Salary for Different Jobs

>As you know the average salary in India is $295 to $300 . Now we need to break it down for different jobs.

Software Engineer – Median Salary would be Rs 400,000/-
Retail Store Manager – Median Salary is Rs 350,000/-
HR Manager – Median Salary is Rs 180,000/-
Civil Engineer – Median Salary is Rs 350,000/-
Lectures or Professor – Median Salary is Rs 240,000/-
Personal Banker – Median Salary is Rs 300,000/-
Sales Officer – Median Salary is Rs 240,000/-
Web Designer – Median Salary is Rs 200,00/-

>So we jot down a list of white collar jobs and their median salary in India. Salaries could differ from city to city.

surejob.in/average-salary-in-india.html

>i'm not payingfor a website that is goinf to free to visit
what red mean by this

+1

Congratulations, you fell to all of the memes.

>Enjoy not getting all the fame from my million dollar idea.
It means he didn't want to pay for it. He just wanted a free website.

I refuse to believe that this is real

...

Please no.

I've seen something very similar IRL, and it was a public service.

This has been in some of my C++14 code for eons.

Attached: notears.png (556x480, 26K)

prove it ;)

I'll do that at work.

>pedobear in the attic

That'll go well with programmer socks.

Sometimes... But the author sounds like an insufferable autistic faglord. You know, the type who brings up atheism at a funeral.