Can your text editor of choice export your current text file to .html in a fraction of a second?
Can your text editor of choice export your current text file to .html in a fraction of a second?
Other urls found in this thread:
No.
I think Notepad does this.
It's called the save button.
>export text file to HTML
Wtf is that supposed to mean, it's fucking text. Just change the file ending brainlet.
This
wtf OP?
we need an Emacs reborn. i know that it hurts but it has to be done.
That unicorn is ugly as fuck.
I'll make the logo and [spoiler]set up electron.
html is a text file.
to make it valid (w3 standards) HTML, you'll need to edit the beginning too, othereise you don't need to edit either
You can record a vim macro to do that.
But then my clipboard manager can do that anyways.
>average notepad-user reading comprehension
how are you going to write text if you can't even read LMAO
emacs is emacs reborn
it's still in development
They're on it.
I knew copyq did it, but I never actually tried it.
So I didn't realize how fun it was.
Emacs is definitely the comfiest one.
That already exists. It's called Guile Emacs. Nobody uses it.
If I set an autocommand to use pandoc yes.
you mean can i write click on a text file and change its file extension?
Your IQ can't possibly be this low.
:::
iLE88Dj. :jD88888Dj:
.LGitE888D.f8GjjjL8888E; .d8888b. 888b 888 888 888
iE :8888Et. .G8888. d88P Y88b 8888b 888 888 888
;i E888, ,8888, 888 888 88888b 888 888 888
D888, :8888: 888 888Y88b 888 888 888
D888, :8888: 888 88888 888 Y88b888 888 888
D888, :8888: 888 888 888 Y88888 888 888
D888, :8888: Y88b d88P 888 Y8888 Y88b. .d88P
888W, :8888: "Y8888P88 888 Y888 "Y88888P"
W88W, :8888:
W88W: :8888: 88888b. 8888b. 88888b. .d88b.
DGGD: :8888: 888 "88b "88b 888 "88b d88""88b
:8888: 888 888 .d888888 888 888 888 888
:W888: 888 888 888 888 888 888 Y88..88P
:8888: 888 888 "Y888888 888 888 "Y88P"
E888i
tW88D ยจ
Yes.
God KDE is so based
>your current text file
Well technically emacs copies the text of files on the disk into a temporary buffer for editing.
No, because it is a text editor, not a text to html converter. Duh.
Retard
>purpos
Why would I ever use (((Emacs))) when it doesn't have the backing of such intellectual philosophers as Uriel, Anselm R. Garbe, Luke Smith and Szabolcs Nagy?
>appeal to the authority
I guess you are homosexual because some big name is a fag too.
>appeal to autism
think it was in jest dude
Because they are all retards.
Also, you're a retard as well, because the title refers to the talk below it on that page, not above.
But these philosophers actually understand the true nature of software. They understand how C was created from raw assembly to give the programmer the bare minimum high-level tool necessary to write all serious programs. Anything else is essentially a cheap imitation of C. This leads to ultra-minimalist software like Vim and Mutt being preferable to non-cat-v-compliant bloatware alternatives like (((Emacs))).
theres some "toHTML" function in vim that generates html including syntax highlighting and formatting. it's pretty cool but i don't see why you would ever need that.
they look very uncomfortable having their pictures taken. i can relate. i guess im a suckless sperg now.
I know this is bait, but I'll point out the following for anyone else here biting:
>we already had higher level languages long before c. entire operating systems were made with them long before unix
>c is an imitation of algol and b, while languages that came before are their own thing
>vim and mutt are bloated abominations. retards believe they are "minimal" just because they run in a terminal
>extreme minimalism isn't good, but pseudominimalism, that is, using software that pretends to be mimimal but isn't, and insisting it is, is mental illness
>large doesn't necessarily imply bloated, especially if it's well designed and modular. see pic related
>intellectual philosophers
>Luke Smith
Why would I even want it to.
If I want text I write text
If I want html I write html
What's next an editor that exports text as C code or some asinine bullshit like that?
Literally a worthless "feature"
one sleevejob, please
>I write html
Spotted the slave-laborer.
Keyword want
Is English your first language?
I do have a personal site written in static html1.1 which I link to in my resume. I don't do webdev or development like a code monkey slave. I'm currently doing R&D and validation but I hop around the industry because my skill set is fairly diverse from esoteric wizard level stuff to common server administration skills.
I pretty much chose the work I do.
>I do have a personal site written in static html1.1 which I link to in my resume. I don't do webdev or development like a code monkey slave. I'm currently doing R&D and validation but I hop around the industry because my skill set is fairly diverse from esoteric wizard level stuff to common server administration skills.
Cool. Where do I subscribe to your blog?