>proof posted
>dismiss it only because your favorite brand didn't do well
>present no counter evidence
Galaxy S10 5G
Blake Thomas
Christian Ramirez
>proof posted
DXOmark posted. It's not proof though.
>present no counter evidence
The internet. Search:
>is dxomark reliable
Turns out that it's not, and has not been considered reliable for years. DXOmark is less reliable than geekbench is for smartphones.
Evan Myers
>The internet. Search:
so you literally have no argument other than refusing to face facts. lmao
Julian Torres
> no source
> no links
> badly compressed jpg uploaded to 4chins is supposed to reflect real world conditions
you are a stupid fucking moron. 100% verifiable.
Benjamin Barnes
>he doesn't know DXO
>he doesn't know how jpeg compression works
is this samshit COPE hour?
dxomark.com
Nathan Rivera
literally all phone cameras apply some sort of DNR to the photos these days. it's awful
Ethan Thomas
i always knew 5g was bad, this is the proof
Hunter Fisher
>so you literally have no argument other than refusing to face facts. lmao
>No argument
The fucking internet holds the argument user.
I even checked gsmarena's camera comparison tool, and the s10+ camera looks like it edges out the mi9.
Ian Green
You faggots are splitting cunt hairs. Buy anything other than iPhone and you won't have to buy a new phone for 5 years.
Matthew Long
> he thinks jpg is somehow lossless
> a website known to be bought by corporations for favourable reviews
> best they can do in op's pic ripped from this site:
> Photo_A_5_SamsungGalaxyS105G.png (PNG Image, 371 × 371 pixels)
> 371x371
> 371x371
> 371x371
HAHAHAHAHA. are you or this extremely gay website you linked to even fucking trying?! how embarrassing.
> cope
back you go, captain fucking retard:
reddit.com