AMD vs Intel IPC

>a chart with numbers
very convincing, much rigor

damage control

>ipc bump is in synthetic benchmarks only
This makes no fucking sense, silicon is silicon

Still using a 3770k

enjoying being a corelet?

yes, I enjoy being a corelet and sucking dick

> benchmarks don't matter anymore

>games are synthetic benchmarks now

In the last 15 years Intel became a management-focused company, repeatedly alienating and losing their technical professional employee cadre, realizing what happened, working to rebuild skills, recovering somewhat (ie. Haifa), but then losing/firing/pissing them off again. There is a fundamental disconnect that came with MBA type management - the Intel main task/business is purely technical like few other things.

>real world
So you mean lousy pajeet code? That's a game of how aggressively the particular semiconductor company can buy the curry necessary to incorporate their processor-specific optimizations through reciprocity. I guess Intel wins there.

Actually, we have a fair amount of data publicly available on how an engineering sample of the 3600 compared to a 2600 matched to its clocks and memory speed. It shows an averaged 13% single threaded IPC gain across a large number of different workloads, and 16% for multithreaded workloads:

browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/13241660?baseline=13267824

Attached: IMG_20190529_002243.png (987x537, 121K)

>ipc increases only on professional workload and on the rest it does nothing

did intel hired the former amd marketing team too?

Nobody loves you, you will die alone and pathetic.

They actually did, they hired some guys from Radeon marketing, the same retards who came up with the "poor volta" and other cringy shit.

>OC to 5niggahertz
>Intel is still faster
Wtfamd