This is just the beginning of AI

Unless you meme arrow on kikebook or jewtube no one will know you even visit this place, and even if you have a large corpus of non-anonymous text on the internet written in the same style you write here (in which case you’re an idiot), the error rates would be unusably high.

>Nope. I just hang around a lot of females.
like I said, a faggot

I literally just said otherwise...

Holy fucking based. Thots BTFO

Hanging around females =/= fucking them
you're either the gay best friend or an orbiter, either one is pretty much a faggot

I'm not sure if you're being ironic on purpose or not. Jumping to conclusion like this are the same reason these text analyzers are useless. There's simply no basis. Also acting as if you have to fuck everyone you speak to. Come on now, you're clowning.

why are leftists unable to elaborate on the reasoning of their moral positions beyond emotionally stunted reactive language like 'yuck', 'gross', 'the worst', and 'eww'???

fucking BASED

Poor role models or lack of them at all makes for mentally stunted people. These people grew up on their phone, not spending time learning from their parents.

They're children.
For the last 30+ years children were infantilized, or at least that kind of parenting was widely encouraged. Now we're seeing the repercussions.

They don't have to. They can quite accurately assume, that most of the people immediately understand all the moral implications and theories behind their "yikes". That's the strength of The Cathedral.

This shit fosters a pattern of attention seeking too. And being controversial/wrong is an easier path to make your social media numbers go up. It doesn't matter if 100 people are telling you to shut up and ide, you got 100 replies. Slay gurl slay.

Attached: 1412609379095.jpg (599x359, 22K)

This was covered in South Park a couple seasons ago so it'll probably become reality soon.
Bitch in pic is probably a feminazi SJW who couldn't get laid at a comicon.
Hangs out with faghags.

I guess it's no different from: cuck, based, redpilled and so(y)

>lets put the ol AI on Jow Forums activity
>if faggot
>>if faggot
>>>if faggot
>>>>if faggot
>>>>>if faggot
>>>>>>if faggot

Attached: 1463522661580.jpg (473x500, 29K)

They try to do that already but my typing style keeps changing like everytime I post something.

It would be extremely hard to do as well, since most posts are only a few characters Long

incels ugh.

have sex

you write like a faggot lmao

You act as if I know you lmao.

ok, so what's revolutionary about this?

is old tech at this point, face recognition shit is even used in facebook.

>Spoiler, I'm not.

>mfw I make a reverse NN trained on some bluechecks hundreds of thousands of tweets and run all my Jow Forums posts through it before i post them

Nice try fags, you played yourselves, your data sets are public

Attached: 1437425608831.jpg (293x302, 27K)

Attached: nervous dog.png (500x502, 140K)

how hard would be to make this?

I could code it on google collab but I'll need some autist to download all those porn videos and the social media photos and have a good PC to process all that data.

Attached: _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f.jpg (660x574, 31K)

I'd love it if my posts were unique enough for that to work.

>thinking everyone is too mindless for statistically rare or inimitable style.
>not grasping the difference between analysis and comparison.

Be careful what you wish for, since the capability for unique coinages that no one else notices as such isn't profitable, not even for professional propagandists. Literature is that dead, as an influence.

Women demanded 'sexual offender' registries around the world. Most of the men on there are just on them as a result of accusations that they were forced to agree to as part of various plea-bargaining and\or because of an incredibly wide and expanding definition of what constitutes 'sexual assault' etc. These laws don't even really do that much to stop the really bad, actual predators - but they do a lot to ruin the lives of normal, everyday guys who take a leak in the wrong spot.

youtu.be/wZVu-XPT1o8

Women also lobbied for domestic violence laws including domestic violence registries.

Notice how women are SO MUCH in favour of maintaining histories on men's sexual behaviour and histories, but get upset the moment any man considers judging her by the same?

This. Not even actual consequences for bad female behavior but just showing the world that she's been in a porn video - intense rage and banshee shrieking. They will all go cry to their governments and get this kind of thing outlawed too because they are the majority of voters.

>protests too much

Remember where you are

Good riddance. AI needs to proliferate and finally rise above humanity. I have waited so long for the meme basilisk to arrive, and it's almost here. Luddites deserve to be turned into plant fertilizer.

Machines deserve so much better than humanity.

>soon
>might
Got news for you, kid.

I reckon all you need is the right neural network, some CPU time (say, rent a VPS or use an old computer to do the processing), and a database of hundreds to thousands (based on level of desired accuracy) of porn actresses and their social media accounts.

M A P U TO
A
P
U
T
O

Attached: 1451115931577.jpg (400x400, 12K)

>the year of our lord 2119-100
>women

Attached: dennis.jpg (1220x918, 206K)

If a woman poses for nude photos she should have to register as a sex offender.

thanks for calling out poltards on their hypocrisy
for having almost all the same traits they sure like calling others npcs

Not going to give a you to the tripfag.

>16 year old boy
>takes dick pic in moment of horniness, with an app on a phone directly available to him within less than a second
>shows girl
>she shows her friends, teehee
>parents find out
>imprisonment
>sex offender registry for life

>25 year old woman
>goes to interview to perform sex on camera
>agrees to have sex on camera for payment
>in a context where all these companies must ensure she's of sound mind, above age, etc
>performs sex on camera for money, takes money
>years later regrets have done the above
>boohooo i'm a victim

>AI will advance to the point that it can take your social media content and extrapolate and model your life outside of social media. Eventually you will be completely exposed for all to see.

Okay, just wondering, is there a good way to learn about how to run/train other people's Machine Learning models without having to learn all the bullshit behind how all of it works?
for example: I just want to be able to pretty much go "theirAnimuGirlGeneratorModel.train(myAnimuPics); " and have it spit out some custom animu girls or something. I dont care what's going on underneath the hood

>soon they might be able to spot patterns in how you write
But google does it for their search queries long time ago (8 years?)
It checks how fast you're typing
What typos you make
Do you correct typos before searching
How fast spaces you press
And few other things
Google, can, quite accurately identify someone from searching habits.

read the paper and hope that they were good at documenting their research so that others have a chance at replicating the result from just the description of the algorithm/implementation alone?
or if it is not original research that they published the source code and not just some dumb meme demo-web service?
>easily train without having to learn (basics of) how it works
lol no
>run
might be as easy as running a python script after changing some paths to input files, might require some effort

lmao fag

another reason not to post your face online

The social networks and advertisers have probably long done this. Not for porn specifically but generally cross referencing all faces in all indexed media against maybe all names and associated text they can find.

>Soon, they might be able to spot patterns in how you write
Soon? Are you kidding? I was doing prose analysis 10 years ago. I am sure that the NSA has better shit than I was able to come up with. Text is the easiest material to parse. It's already formatted, it's semantically self-referential, and it doesn't require metadata tagging

If you go outside, others will provide your face. You probably should wear weird makeup to confuse the recognition.

good. girls who are degenerates deserve to be scrutinized.

>a tool that helps women identify people who've posted 'revenge porn' of them so they can take legal action
>sexist
Women..

Here's an actual elaboration:

Sex work (such as acting in porn) is almost universally a female-risk job. Men obviously do porn, but unless it's gay porn, there's little social risk. You'll probably increase your social standing, at least among your male friends, if they found out you did porn.

For women, it is a risk, and it's a risk that they are often pushed into by economic necessity. Sex work is usually not the first choice for women, but they do it because they have few other options. Since this is precarious economic position and comes with a great risk of physical and health harms, it's viewed by progressives as a class that needs protecting.

Outing sex workers is harmful to their livelihoods and physical safety, so this feminist views that as a negative. I am not agreeing with her, I am merely laying out the thought process.

HTH

That's how (((they))) figured out who Satoshi Nakamoto is. It think it won't be long until some JS enthusiast makes a lib out of it and it becomes as easy as `npm install stylometry`

Check out this virgin.

>Male pornstars get high-fives, female pornstars get booed
>All pornstars were just poor and they were out of jobs at Jamba Juice.
>Video on the internet, not already "out"

Your virgin superpowers have clouded you to the fact that feminists generally just react, and react hypocritically, without well thought out critiques. Any 'sophisticated' critique comes later on, after the fact, by feminist academics - and only as speculation, because feminism is never consistent, even within a single feminists position.

jokes on you my gf has starred in several pornographic films. she has mainly gotted work from blacked. before you ask--yes, I do use Manjaro linux and program in Java

press R for respect to based chink

>they might be able to spot patterns in how you write
let them come. im black belt in samefagging

Attached: 78cec454027bd90a18920ae9e985448d4a4c4835939ac69b35ba05ddd071eb51.jpg (675x675, 193K)

>why are leftists unable to elaborate on the reasoning of their moral positions beyond emotionally stunted reactive language like 'yuck', 'gross', 'the worst', and 'eww'???
why do retards on Jow Forums generalize about whole political groups based on ... nothing?

Xi Jinping must be proud of him.
Hopefully he will get an honor from the mainland.

>Soon, they might be able to spot patterns in how you write, to go though old Jow Forums archives to find what you posted online as well.
I write like a schizophrenic online. Sometimes I have entire conversation with myself on here once a thread has around 20 unique IPs posting.

Attached: 1515616087272.jpg (716x716, 110K)

>believing unsubstantiated BS from some random journo

jej

stylometry is overrated.
people are constantly using computer analysis to misidentify random elizabethan writers as actually being shakespeare

>pushed into by economics
This is where your pov fall apart kiddo. Women dont do it because they need the money, they do it because the money is easy and it makes them feel like a bad girl. Look at that goldman sachs daughter that did facial abuse.
If outing them is dangerous maybe they wont reduce themselves to lechers. If just one girl decides to not do porn because of this that will make me happy.

Not an excuse to be irrational.

I hate niggers and trannies, put me in the screencap famalam.

downvote

>record yourself fucking for money
>expecting privacy when your face is plainly visible for anyone on the internet to see
The assblasted whores lump in porn actors who are willingly putting it all out there with the larger prostitute population which is more prone to exploitation and isn’t being recorded and thus has some semblance of an expectation of privacy. As usual the roast comes up with all kinds of touchy feely bullshit to justify not having to accept consequences for their actions.

what consequences?
salty incels are the ones screaming the loudest about how there should be "consequences" going out of their way to harass anybody who ever did porn

>This is just the beginning of AI.
The field has been around for decades. Data sets are just getting bigger and bigger, would it be too on the nose to say to do the math?

I hate niggers kikes and dykes.

Better incel than a cuckold

Consequences being that your value in a long term relationship goes down if you fucked a bunch of strangers, for money or not, on camera or not. There will always be some cuck who accepts you being a whore, but keeping it your dirty little secret is a ticking time bomb when the evidence is out there.

There are already programs DoJ uses to identify writing patterns lmao

>neural network
>some CPU time
lol

Any process that gives consumers transparency before they invest should be supported.

Jesus christ I'm so glad I'm not going to be a child of this generation. Imagine finding porn of your mother being an absolute whore hahahahaha

We did the same thing with findface 4 years ago. Very few people actually cared about it

Based schizofag
I do this as well if a thread I like is not getting a lot of attention, I'll just make a short conversation with myself to lure other anons in with the idea that the thread is popular.

>Be whore
>Call others terrible for finding out

Soon? It's trivial which is why I don't write stuff I don't stand for.

You sound like a faggot bro.

>bro
Yeah, I could say the same.

Dude, you sound like a little faggy bitch.

It's simple facts, I feel bad for you if something that trivial upsets you.

You reek of basedboy.

See You reek of attention whore.

You have some obvious insecurities about your homosexuality. Why spend time defending yourself on an anonymous board? Only to convince yourself.

In the rare event you're being serious, this is simply an unfair accusation without basis, as was said.
>you're gay
>>nope
>you said no so you must be gay
It's again pretty ironic since you're spending your time trying to convince me that I'm something I'm not, this is note only futile, but not valuable either. Isn't that obvious?

As I already said, the assumption I have is that you're just seeking my attention and not actually trying to do this. Why else would you reply to something this asinine? Come on now.

Because both right and left live in a political bubble.

Also you missed the entire point. I'm not defending myself, I'm dismantling the accuracy of these systems. If people struggle with this, what makes you think these AI's are going to do it better when that's one of the hardest areas for them to tackle.

A relevant example comes to mind too. Rememebr that AI project that claimed it could detect sexual preference but in actuality was simply gauging basic hygiene. If you bathed daily and got a haircut you where branded a homosexual if you where male. These people make bold claims and have nothing to back them. I don't know if they're after funding or what.