There are two pedestrians and you need to steer the wheel to one of them.
One is a healthy adult male and one is 9yo child.
If you can select where it could go, where would you let it go?
+-----------------------+------+-------+ | PROBABILITY | MALE | CHILD | +-----------------------+------+-------+ | | | | | Could hit if steered | 80% | 20% | | | | | | Could survive the hit | 80% | 20% | +-----------------------+------+-------+
I let it go into animetrads aka disgusting pedo degenerates
Bentley Howard
Why are cagers so hell bent on killing people?
Sebastian Diaz
Poltards would want to reinforce the autonomous cars training bias against black people
Bentley Clark
I'd detect the pedestrians far enough away to brake safely.
Lucas Rodriguez
Being caged makes them angry.
Zachary Roberts
How about programming a car that can see more than 30 ft in front of it?
Carter Reed
If I have the time to choose which one I kill, I probably have the time to brake.
Adrian Harris
>what race are they?
Blake Ross
Towards the child. In this situation it would want to cause the least amount of damage/harm possible. Even if the adult has an 80% survival chance he will still be hit by a car and likely sustain injury, however the child only has a 20% of being hit, which is a lot better than being hit. Basically they both have the same survival chance, but not being hit is better than being hit. Could be wrong since I'm pretty shit at probability.
