Ryzen 5 3600 benchmark found

WAKE ME UP

This can't be happening. I'm in charge here.

Attached: 1555800838525.webm (750x692, 2.55M)

Attached: 7a4.png (450x290, 171K)

Not a good week to be an intlel fan boi, not even cope lake can save them.

Attached: a4a.jpg (251x241, 14K)

this can't be happening

Someone get that Intel Discord started so we can start fighting back against AMD.

Ice Lake is meant for mobiles anyway, with a top clock of 1.5 GHz.

>1.5 GHz

Attached: 1558450762366.jpg (275x183, 9K)

>waited on zen 2
>it actually delivers
incel shills in absolute shambles

Attached: lmao.gif (600x580, 472K)

>beats a 9900k
the absolute mental state of ayyymdbros

Attached: file.png (1416x640, 112K)

Top clock

Attached: 1551151971272.jpg (1170x1200, 230K)

Top cuck

THE
ABSOLUTE
STATE
OF
BROS

Attached: file.png (1404x658, 117K)

this is the result with shit ram right

Setting up a Discord server to organize against AMD. Remember, misleading information, misleading reviews, shun anyone who uses AMD and do NOT respond to AMD threads. This one is a necessary evil.

JEDEC specced zen 2 at 3200
3200 is a base clock for RAM now.

better luck with Zen2+ bros

Attached: file.png (1412x552, 104K)

discord.gg/KBTk2x

Discord link to fight AMD.

fuck off discord tranny

See you at NDA lift when zen 2 gets destroyed in gaming benchmarks again and nobody buys them

Attached: 1558965388370.png (1200x800, 164K)

See you in two months after release when Windows patches their OS and every game gets their update and Zen2 ROFLstomps on processors costing twice as much with half the capability.

>medium end CPU 10% behind intel's HEDT CPU
>"hurr AyyyMD shills"

Now that's coping.

top kek

>trusting """benchmarks""" from unknown sources

>Now that's coping.
did u miss this:
beat by cheaper cpu too

embarassing

it keeps getting better

Attached: file.png (1405x554, 100K)

IT?S RYZEN 1 ALL OVER AGAIN BROSSSSS

Attached: file.png (1403x532, 97K)

>+10%
>more expensive
>"beat by cheaper CPU"

WHAT DID HE MEAN BY THIS ?

...

What a mental breakdown.

You're talking about an HEDT chip versus the absolute midrange model.

lol

Attached: discord.png (225x281, 13K)

Can't wait when they benchmark it with decent ram.

You're earning your shekels today

why the antisemitism?

So basically, only 3800 may be better than intel's best offering

Y
I
K
E
S

Attached: uhoh.png (447x229, 25K)

>GT710
no shit senpai

>nvidia card
There's the answer

UAMAD.

It's like a shit tier N.O.M.A.A.M.

Attached: No_ma_am_shirt_grande.png (600x335, 426K)

what went wrong brosssssssss

Attached: file.png (1407x560, 104K)

Oof. Tbf I expected better SC perf than a fucking 9400f, itself having worse SC perf than a i3 8350k

In canada the 3600 will be 299, the i3 can be had for half that used or 199 new. I thought zen2 brought better SC perf?

>+10% (no overclock and +45% multicore) over the I5 9600K
the userbench against the 9600k showed the 9600k having stronger overall single threaded performance. it only lost heavily in multi which isn't to surprising since the 3600 has SMT enabled. but the amount of single the 9600k is pretty small. much smaller gap compared to its massive loss in multi. amd did a good job. sidegrade level of upgrade for those on 8700k's and 9900k's but for everyone else, zen 2 looks like a good upgrade to.

Attached: Capture.png (1427x1270, 90K)

The 3600 has shit ram and lowered turbo (which is the speed at which the bench runs)

>can't deal with amd not being able to make a fast CPU and they just glue a bunch of cores together to get high benchmark scores.

copelel

>downclocked (turbo below nominal value)
not really. remember, XFR is based on factors of how many threads are in use, power consumption, and heat. zen 1 never maintained its highest boost clock it was rated for in practically anything. 4.1ghz+ was pretty much for small load's for a few seconds. never sustained. sustained for my 2700x is around 3.8-4ghz. yes, even in single threaded scenarios. like sc2 averages 3.9-4ghz sustained. even though AMD advertises the 2700x with a 4.3ghz boost.
>pic related
for those thinking i'm a shill.

Attached: suckitfags.png (2560x1440, 3.53M)

>wow
how does it feel to spend insane amounts of money on a dead game?

I'm so horny right now.
Thanks, Mommy Su

Attached: 1541518394583.jpg (757x627, 87K)

>dead
Because Half Life 2 is more popular lmaaoo haha

Attached: 276601.png (1000x743, 62K)

my 2700x can boost to 4.35ghz on a few cores np. nh-d15 c14 b-die

Holy shit.

Attached: fl.png (1084x487, 89K)

The 3600 is faster than the 2600x. Impressive.

Attached: sdfc.png (1079x674, 110K)

> lowered turbo (which is the speed at which the bench runs)
see
for all we know XFR still behaves in a similar fashion to current zen. so don't expect max boost speeds to be sustained in practically anything.

though the ram part, yes, 2666mhz is pretty low for zen, but we really don't know if zen 2 is as ram dependent as zen 1. they did a lot of changes and improvements to infinity fabric with zen 2's infinity fabric 2 (2.3x transfer rate per link (25 gt/s, up from ~10.6 gt/s)) and the new dedicated i/o die really changes it. for all we know, zen 2 could be less ram dependent than current zen. but overall if we want a fair comparison. both intel and amd systems need the same speed of ram.

Could you retards come up with a better argument? I'm brand agnostic and just want the best value but all I see is somebody showing that the zen+ uses misleading boost numbers and some amd shill who avoids the evidence amd attacks the game played

Oy vey! time to demand Trump to ban AMD too, it's the only way to prevent this holocaust!

>my 2700x can boost to 4.35ghz on a few cores np. nh-d15 c14 b-die
yeah for like a few seconds. but it won't maintain it as sustained. that's the keyword here, sustained. XFR isn't designed to run its max boost speed sustained but only for a few seconds in low loads. then drop down to a sustained level. in single core that sustained level is around 3.9-4.1ghz. some might be better binned than others and maintain 4.2 sustained in single core. but from, most i've seen, they behave similar to mine. 4ghz is the top off for single sustained. multi it drops even more. in multi my 2700x maintains an all core sustained of 3.9ghz and 3.8ghz in avx loads. i too have a nh-d15.

Hahahaha, the absolute state of shills.

Attached: wojak-had-enough-of-intels-bullshit.jpg (512x599, 131K)

eh i'm that 2700x owner who plays WoW. i mean, to be fair to AMD they don't lie about boost numbers, because it will hit that 4.3ghz (4.4ghz with XFR enabled). it just not sustained. its for a few seconds in low load usage. which is what i'm trying to tell people. don't expect the maximum boost level to be sustained for even medium loads. my 2700x doesn't even maintain its 4.3-4.4ghz in cpu-z bench. so its single thread score is always based off of 4.1. as my 2700x can maintain 4.1ghz for the duration of its bench in the single threaded part. i guess you can say amd misleads people by people seeing 4.3ghz on spec sheets and think that will be their single threaded clock frequency.

i'm sure it can get through cinebench at 4.35 but can't test again until sunday. what memory are you using.

XFR is only ever reached for fractions of a second, and only on a single core. Its irrelevant in a highly threaded workload to begin with.

>10% higher performance for double the price
ok, you can have that win heeb.

>lower turbo than 2600x
Bullshit

Why are you picking the worst benchmark out of the available 2?
the one you niggers are posting could only boost to 3.75gz and used shitty 2133mhz ram
the other one could boost up to 4.05ghz and used 2666mhz ram and got up to 135 points
overclock it 300mhz more and it will gain another 20 points

the intel shills in this thread are using the shitty engineering sample

no, it can't. as pointed out. its only for a few seconds. then quickly drops. but of course this is all based off current zen+ XFR 2 design. XFR 1 was even worse. AMD really hasn't mention much about any changes with XFR with zen 2. so for all we know it behaves similar. i'm sure AMD really wants to maintain those higher clocks and they probably did tweaks to it i'm sure but we won't really know until we get our hands on it.

>and 3.8ghz in avx loads
Isn't that largely due to cooling capacity though? I can maintain 3.8GHz in AVX load too, with 2400G even though that's zen1. zen2 could behave a bit differently with its lower power consumption.

My 2700x stays at a constant 3.25 when gaming and occasionally rarely jumps to 3.5, always does this on all cores.
Sounds to me like you lost the lottery :(

>gayming
>tree trunk
OHNONONONO AMDTODDLERS BTFO

That's it I'm getting a 9900k
AMD fucked up once again
It's always the same
fuck you amd shills for hyping me

Attached: 1493358135944.jpg (1055x1073, 169K)

my brain turned to mush long ago so i should be careful here but i get a higher single core score when power plan is set to balanced compared to high performance. high perf pegs it at 4ghz. also, i've seen other benchmarks, even some games where balanced scores higher than a set 4.2ghz. not many, but some.

Not really. Remember, it has a 15% or so IPC increase. It gets more done at lower frequencies because that's how IPC works.

XFR is based off a combination of silicon binning, voltage, power consumption, and heat. i'm using a nh-d15 and live in the pacific northwest so blessed by cool ambient temps and my 2700x can only do 3.8ghz in avx prime. 3.9ghz in intel burn test. before i got my d15 i used the stock cooler and achieved 3.6ghz in prime. i don't doubt someone else's 2700x can do 3.9ghz in prime but it all comes down to binning and the other factors listed along with it.

>gt 710
fuck off incel
the intel shills in this thread are comparing the shitty engineering sample with 2133mhz ram and 3.75ghz boost to the i9 9900kf
the proper engineering sample has 2666mhz ram and can boost up to 4.05ghz and btfo intel cpus

Uhh... how exactly does it beat a 9900k?

Attached: notbtfo.png (714x378, 70K)

Attached: 562.png (1597x1600, 627K)

>a ryzen 5 3600 at 4.3ghz can btfo an i9 9900k at 5ghz
>source: my ass
Post the fucking source, idiot.

Best webm

windows did update balance profile for ryzen in the later windows 10 versions. so for ryzen if running stock balance is better than high performance / ryzen balance profile. for overclocks high performance is better. balance allows ryzen to disable cores completely on the fly with very low latency response and can help boost another core up higher. helping a core maintain a higher frequency for longer periods of time. while manually overclocking its better to use high performance because you're trying to maintain that clock on all cores 24/7 and don't need the power savings. but ryzen's power architecture and XFR boost algorithm is weird. couple that in with silicon binning and you can get exceptions where a ryzen will do better at default settings with balance mode than a manual overclock.

So 3600 beats 2600x by 11% even at lower clocks? Impressive

rip incels.

Attached: 1559233581974.jpg (1109x1079, 166K)

>ddr4 4000
>21%OC
>still btfo in SC by any intel cpu in the last 5y

Attached: dixon-657368-f-wp-content-uploads-2018-08-1266871_859a5988e720881-e1534537802932-1200x800.jpg (576x648, 38K)

>tfw you're on a 2500k
>tfw any CPU will be a massive upgrade regardless
>tfw need to do some light workstation work anyway so a 3900 will not disappoint
Getting a 3900 regardless at this point. That said you AMDrones are fucking stupid if you genuinely believe all this shit, every single time you hype up an AMD product, then get wrecked when real benchmarks come out. How you haven't learned to keep your mouth shut yet is amazing (or you're all just shitposters with no actual attachment to either company, then it would make sense).

People should know that Intel is for Right Wing Jews.

AMD is for the PROGRESSIVE MASTER RACE.

Single core sustained will be closer to 4.3. The xfr on 2700x is weaker than on first gen. 4ghz is typical of what youd see for a sustained all core boost

Intel is done. shows AMD can halve the memory latency and boost significantly higher than the engineering sample used for this bench.

Attached: intelisdone.png (1410x422, 93K)

Shill would imply they do it for money. They're closer to scatfags at this point, gladly getting pozzed and fucked in the arse and consuming the shit intel produces

Attached: 1558950008166.jpg (1365x1280, 810K)

remember, benchmarks dont matter

3900X is too good for someone like you.