Zen 2

TDP is not power consumption. Read it as 3800X can be more liberal with boosting than what out of box 3700X can with its more restricted power target

3600x with fat cooler from athlon 2

>your current cpu
FX-6350
>your future cpu
3900X

I've been waiting to upgrade for a while now, so yeah, assuming Ryzen 3000 does not end up disappointing in some way (latency, thread scheduling issues across chiplets, whatever else) when proper reviews are out.
>your current cpu
4790K @ 4.7GHz
>your future cpu
3900X probably

>2600X
>probably some Intel as soon as they fix the SSD crippling
also i don't think 30% uplift over ryzen 2000 will be enough to beat Intel

Attached: Ryzen2000.png (631x695, 49K)

Nah I got my TR2 already

>current system

2500k, 16 GB ram, 560 To

>next system

3900x, 32 GB ram, 2080 ti

Deep learning and AOSP build speed gonna be off the chain.

Also getting new monitors for the first time in 5+ years

>benq 32" 4k IPS professional (programming)
>benq 27" 1080p 240 hz (games)

Pretty stoked for the upgrade. I don't play games anymore but it's the first time I'm building a computer not as a poorfag student. Probably gonna drop at least $3k and hope to have it last 8 years like my last comp.

>>your current cpu
9900K
>>your future cpu
10900K

1700
to
3900x

>your current cpu
i7 950

>your future cpu
3900x

Attached: 1386541168446.png (1366x768, 225K)

>your current cpu
ryzen 5 1600 (stock)
>your future cpu
Will wait for benchmarks. Maybe I will grab mITX x570 board + used zotac 1080 ti mini and 3700X, or keep my b350 board if memory support is good and slap a 3600X/3800X in there. Will also consider navi.
Binning. Everyone bragged about how 1600 overclocks but, in fact, it's much harder to get a stable overclock on 1600 than on 1600x. In the end I gave up because gains were marginal. Though in case of 3700X/3800X 3700X might actually be better binned because of such minor clock difference.

>Will you be upgrading this year Jow Forums?
I don't know. I want to for the satisfaction, but I have no practical reason to unless I invest myself into current video games.
>your current cpu
i5 2500k at 4.3 GHz, dependable since 2011. Matched with a GTX 970 since 2015.
>your future cpu
Depends on whether I'm upgrading this year. If so I'm gonna have to check how the 3700X and 3800X stack up against each other in terms of single thread performance, overall performance and overclocking potential. Would also be buying an RTX 2070.

>your current cpu
i7 7700K
>your future cpu
i7 7700K

haven't felt any pressure to upgrade my cpu or 1080 Ti since I bought them however many years ago. The stagnation is real.

>i don't think 30% uplift over ryzen 2000 will be enough to beat Intel
Yet you post a benchmark where Intel isn't even 15% ahead.

still using an r7 1700, who /comfy/ here

The 3600X is 4.4Ghz boost only ?
It's actually really disappointing, knowing that AMD boosts are 100Mhz away from the max OC frequency.

i7 4790k
close to my average 5 year pc cycle

Gonna get me a new thredripper probs

I'll be upgrading from an FX6300. I already have a Vega56, now just waiting for the Zen 2 launch.

Although depending on how big the discounts will be on last gen Zen I might go with that instead. I'll decide once reviews and retail prices are out.

Like the 1700 can be found for like $200 now which is a crazy deal. If the 2700 goes on the same kind of discount I'll probably get that.

Attached: bzi6vSM.png (550x417, 21K)

3900X is probably 5x faster than that FX

Attached: 1558971971271.jpg (2053x1025, 137K)

i5-6600k
I'll wait for affordable PCIe 4 MBs and for Intel's answer to see if Zen 2 prices go down a little

Only in heavily threaded work. Single threading really hasn't improved that much in the last 10 years. It's only doubled or so.

Attached: biBenpa.png (1080x757, 69K)

Current is 2600g and yes I plan on getting a 3600x

i have the same cpu and planning a similar upgrade
i was going to do the upgrade last fall but Jow Forums told me to wait for the new batch of amd, and i guess this is it

Now wait for Zen 2+

Based Ryzen raping Intel stupid.

Attached: 1559146752169.jpg (800x1500, 162K)

Productiveness applications have figured out multithreading long ago, and even games are maxing out 4-core CPUs nowadays, hyperthreaded or not (since it only makes a 15% difference). It's not future proof anymore.

most i'll wait is end of summer, i'm hanging in by a thread at this point

I'm building my dad an itx APU. But that don't count really.

Shit I meant 2200g

Always seems like a good time to wait, but in case of Zen 3 AMD's own main goal is efficiency, not performance.

Attached: small_zen_slide.jpg (625x352, 39K)

I said Zen 2+ not Zen 3

yes

i5 3330, found it and a motherboard in a dumpster a few years ago and when my 960t died I swapped this in

I'm thinking 3600, more than 12 threads isn't gonna do me any good and if current ryzen is anything to go by the non-x models will likely be able to achieve the same clockspeeds

Zen 2+ -is- Zen 3. They're skipping the + this time.

>current
1600
>future
probs the 3700x or 3600x

No refresh before Zen 3?

Zen 3 is on track for 2020, if they wanted to squeeze a refresh inbetween they'd have to release it for the holidays already.

>coffee lake 8 cores instead of zen2 12 cores
lol

Not him but the 8700k has fewer cores and a similar boost per core but it's maintaining a decent lead. If you OC to 5ghz that's like another 15% over it's 6 core boost (4.3ghz)

According to the official amd charts, it doesn't look like there'll be a "+" version to zen3/4 not surprising since we're close to the silicon's limit

Zen+ wasnt part of the plan. Shortly before Sen's launch Papermaster said they would be releasing zen on a tock, tock, tock cadence, referring to Intel's tick-tock where tocks are new uarchs. I'm guessing zen+ had something to do with the original GF 7LP bring cancelled, but that's just my gut feeling

currently on xeon e3-1231v3
was considering the 3700x during the leaks as it was supposed to be 12 core

i'm not sure, will probably wait for zen 2+ or zen 3

Attached: y85kd.jpg (477x640, 40K)

The Intel CPUs are Stock, beating Ryzen with fewer Cores in a Multithreaded Game
I don't think the Ryzen 3000 Gen will be faster than current Intel K CPUs

How does 3800X get 147fps in PUBG and 9900k 144fps then

Why bother upgrade if you have a 9900K? Even if 10900K will release in 2021 (or 2020), it will not be much faster than 9900K

It means Ryzen IPC now is equal to Skylake, which is a good thing anyway

i7 4770k i believe. Yes I'll be doing a complete rebuild. Probably a 3900X.

Maybe because they tested it with a frame cap of 144FPS
And PUBG isn't a good Benchmark anyway, here you can see that the CPUs are caped
Also, it was a Benchmark made from AMD to show their Products in the Best Light possible.
Remember what they did with Vega? Caping it at 60FPS in Doom so people would suggest there is more Performance behind it than there really is
All of you should wait for real Tests before buying blindly

Attached: PUBG MAX FPS.png (631x1030, 74K)

FX 8320 -> 3900X
Always bet on moar cores. The 8320 is still pulling punches after all the security patches and thanks to Linux, so I'll just double down.

>your current cpu
8700k delid @ 5GHz all
>your future cpu
Whatever has a noticeable perf increase, and has the best platform

current is 2600k future is 3800x
probably better binned, higher boost all cores , hopefully better overclock

same. guess zen2+ is gonna replace my xeon e3

>knowing
how you know it already ? we don t know how TSMC chips behave . AMD didn t even talk about XFR which is queit odd . hopefully at E3 we get more infos

phenom x4 980 to 3600

>your current cpu
i5 4460
>your future cpu
either the 3600 or the 3600X

Look at all the poorfags who defended zen+ with the "it's only 10fps difference" meme without even having it
Sitting on some shitty phenoms and cucked i5s and shitposting about Hardware they never had
Jow Forums 2019

Niggers gonna be poor

Better binned silicon.