Redpill me on lisp

There is no such thing as an "efficient" or "inefficient" language. It all boils down to the implementation.
Reminder that we are stuck with x86 thanks to C.

>tfw we had more advanced operating systems in the 70s than we have now in 2019
Thanks, Bell Labs.

Implementation is governed by semantics.

I still don’t understand exactly what you mean by this

Lisp programs are just Lisp expressions.
(define some-numbers '(1 2 3))
(define a-program (cons '+ some-numbers))

a-program
=> (+ 1 2 3)

(eval a-program)
=> 6
Beside that, Lisps give you access to all the symbol tables so you can hotswap code dynamically if you want to.

Haskell is more terse than Lisp, yet it has a Turing complete type system.
Hmm... Really makes you think

>typing is about terseness or verbosity
>implying all those workarounds have anything to do with verbosity

> redpill
This word is insta-ban, OP.

Nice! You manage to explain lisp and it's benefits in the fewest words I have ever seen. You win one Internet.

Attached: F6D96E90-577F-4709-863A-40FC76C02A11.jpg (600x622, 31K)