What are your thoughts about the 5G death ray?

5g is spyware

Meh. People got more ionizing radiation by using CRTs.

Well tell fucking China and India that, since they're the main contributors.

I have been getting gangstalked for 5 years now and almost every time I try to tell people the truth about 5G online my internet connection drops. The information how to stop it is definitely being surpressed

Try again

>complaining about 5g
Bitch please
Im hooking coils to my wrists and gonna go round frying every circuit I can with a gesture of freedom
Wolololo, there is no more spying glow

...

It's thousands of times less powerful than the radiation you expirience every waking moment from the moment you are born. I don't get why this is such a big deal.

I am concerned that it is being pushed far too quickly with insufficient understanding of it's effects on human health, I doubt it's a 'depopulation ray' or any other conspiracy nonsense (how much it will boost mass surveillance ability is NOT a conspiracy and IS scary as shit), otherwise but I cannot imagine it has zero effects on our biology. The regulations concerning EM radiation safety are outdated and based on simplistic (ie does it heat things? no? ur good) understandings of possible effects.
I'm probably going to build a faraday cage to sleep in, if/once it hits mass deployment in my living space. Maybe investigate in conductive-cloth clothing; I DEFINITELY will not be carrying anything 5g around in my pocket.

> what is non-ionizing radiation?

Your microwave oven is less than one millionth of the power of the Sun, but it can still fuck you up.

5G will bring about world peace. Don't worry about it.

Hey idiot, geologist here.

Do you really think that the entire scientific community has been using the readings from the Mauna Loa Observatory without considering this? You're not smarter than them.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/climateqa/mauna-loa-co2-record/

jfc I can't believe they let people like you vote.

If emissions are flat that means CO2 concentration will continue, because we keep emitting more.

Think of it like you're driving in a car. If emissions aren't rising, that's like driving at a constant speed. Your acceleration is zero but your velocity is constant.

Your argument is basically saying "since I'm not speeding up, I won't move." This is wrong. you'll continue to move at a constant rate. Atmospheric CO2 is a little more nuanced since there are other factors that affect it, so it isn't going to increase at a constant rate, but your argument is fundamentally flawed.

Will it reach 1000? I dunno, why not? We keep dumping more CO2 into the atmosphere so its concentration is likely to keep growing. It was 1500 ppm during the Carboniferous.

5G health hazzards is whack conspiracy garbage. It's only come to prominence because the Russian gov't is running disinformation campaigns against the US.

We've seen the widespread proliferation of 2G/3G/4G/4GLTE cell service, AM/FM/XM radio, Wi-Fi in almost every American household and business. Despite widespread adoption, we haven't seen any mutual widespread growth in cancer rated or the purported health impacts.

In other words, go back to high school faggot.

Attached: stfu boomer.jpg (512x408, 43K)

>We've seen the widespread proliferation of 2G/3G/4G/4GLTE cell service, AM/FM/XM radio, Wi-Fi in almost every American household and business. Despite widespread adoption, we haven't seen any mutual widespread growth in cancer rated or the purported health impacts.
Bro are you literally fuckin retarded, it takes like 30 years to accurately gauge the effects of things like this, especially w regards to cancer and shit

Attached: hierarchy-of-evidence2.png (1946x1178, 172K)

imagine being so dumb to take the word of those who would most benefit from it, when you barely require the cognitive abilities to soak up at least the most elemental bits and pieces - like a good idiot citizen is supposed to

youtube.com/watch?v=lCIAcZov5Hs

corbettreport will also soon cough a video on it can't imagine its because 5G isn't "controversial" to put it nonchalantly

Attached: 134.png (470x364, 101K)

imagine being so dumb to take the word of some YouTube schizo/Russian disinformation shill

lol yeah because youtube videos aren't based on facts, and everyone does their own research because there's nothing better to do - never mind not having the bare minimum qualification or resources to do so

you're better off taking the word of someone whose acknowledged as a "good actor"

whats the source for that claim - yb videos of any reasonable creators are sourced, but i bet you nigger can't read lol

Attached: 1477850969040.png (634x623, 943K)

>sourced
Having sources doesn't mean shit if the sources are poorly-done studies or the person citing the source doesn't interpret it properly.

>this independent YouTube creator would never lie to me or mislead me
>don't forget to subscribe to him and donate to his patreon though

there you have it ... now what would you rather believe - the countless sources and studies to be sifted through and read or the evidence at hand - which was sourced for you by someone else, all you'd have to do is to find a logical reason why it wouldn't be

do yourself a favor and watch - won't change a thing, except worry you for no reason as you're at best will limit your personal exposure

don't even know what the fuss is about, this is neither controversial nor a conspiracy

Attached: 1479045688755.png (264x234, 4K)

I agree with this

>spent 30 minutes watching some fear-mongering lunatic/scam artist sift through various charts and graphs he barely understands in a completely non-structured mess of a video
No thanks, if you want to present a concise list of points he made in the video and link the sources here I'll be happy to read through them though.

50+ links are linked in the video - reading one scientific source takes probably longer than watching their "presentation" summarizing many of the sources in a way even a simpleton would get it

key problems: Latency, causation = correlation fallacy assumption which is btfo'd, categorization of cause/effect - pinning the problem to something else

Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (review).
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738972

Exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000689931500030X

Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations
researchgate.net/publication/318916428_Impact_of_radiofrequency_radiation_on_DNA_damage_and_antioxidants_in_peripheral_blood_lymphocytes_of_humans_residing_in_the_vicinity_of_mobile_phone_base_stations

Effects of the Exposure to Mobile Minireview
Phones on Male Reproduction: A Review of the Literature
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2164/jandrol.111.014373

good luck dismantling any of those or what he addresses in the 30 min

Attached: 1479599491847s.jpg (250x206, 7K)

>Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A) (review).
>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25738972
>a literal fucking questionnaire
See

how else would you find out how long they've used their cell phones on average

Attached: 1475482770942.png (576x507, 59K)

guess your fucking brain is already turned to mush, supposedly the cancer kicks mostly in around 60 when you're old and brittle and shit can't/won't hold together as nicely but i'm sure there's exceptions

i'm outta here

>Exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats
Okay, lets download the full study and have a look at their methods.
>In the irradiated group, the rats were exposed to radiation at a power density of 1 mW/cm2
Looking at average power density of radiation from mobile networks/phones
ucc.ie/en/media/support/radiationprotectionoffice/MicrowaveRadiation.pdf
>The frequency of microwave radiation used to carry information between mobile phones
and transmission towers (high masts spaced about 15 miles apart) is 900 MHz. The power
density limit for this frequency is 1 mW/cm2 [2 is superscript]. The microwave transmission is
made at relatively low power - about 300 watts. The typical power density at the base of a
transmission mast would be much less than 0.02 mW/cm2 [2 is supercript] - well below the
IRPA limit of 1 mW/cm2 [2 is supercript]. However, power density of microwave radiation
around the antennae of many mobile phone hand sets has been quoted at around 0.45 mW/cm2 [2
is superscript], which is close to the IRPA limit for the general public.
So rats (which are fucking tiny compared to humans) exposed to over twice the average power density to which humans (big mammals) are exposed to develop some problems. Great fucking methodology there. Not even going to bother with the rest of your trash studies.

>5g is harmful

Attached: mmmeme.jpg (639x358, 52K)

>hurr wheres the proofs
>literally hundreds of studies showing health problems from EMFs
>hurr durr the studies are no good
you are absolutely fucking retarded. if anything the burden of proof should be on telco companies to show that their technology is 100% safe. which is impossible since cell phones havent even been around for longer than a couple of decades so the long term effects are completely unknown. but yeah sure lets use the entire human population as guinea pigs and just see what happens. its not like deadly stuff like cigarettes or asbestos was deemed perfectly "safe" not too long ago.

>literally hundreds of studies
Yeah and this disc contains 100,000 games

Attached: 91n686QxeNL._SX342_.jpg (342x342, 40K)

Kys

>stop it
i welcome it

fasty fast funny video downloads on pocketphone, cannot wait, what a world, now i love 5g, what the heck

That's the kind that cooks food right?

The most euphoric pic I've seen today. Whoever made this must be super fun guy to hang around at parties.

Seething anti-intellectual retard

Microwave oven produces thousands of times more radiation than you expirience on average.

Shoo shoo schizos, back to and back to where you can debate laser Jews to your heart's content!

Attached: eternalbiblefundamentalist.png (1000x647, 551K)