What is a free ISO mounter? I would use PowerISO but you have to pay for it.
What is a free ISO mounter? I would use PowerISO but you have to pay for it
Windows 8 and up can mount ISO just by right clicking, you don't need 3rd party software.
Magiciso? I dont remember cause I dont use trash OS.
And furthermore, if you're on Windows 7 on occasion (as I am right now), you could always just, I dunno.
Extract the thing with 7zip. There's always that. There are very few things that require me to MOUNT an ISO. And those things happen at boottime anyway, so I'd be using some Grub4DOS hacks, not PowerISO.
WinCDEmu
>he fall for the Windows 7 meme
lmao
>having to pay for software to do something as simle as mounting an iso
The state of winblows
But isn't it bloat to include features in the OS that most people won't use
Windows 7 launched in 2009.
Could Linux even do ANYTHING in 2009? Like, did you guys even have Libreoffice and Wine back then? Or was it just literally Gimp and that's it?
sudo mount /media/storage/big.black.dicks.in.white.chicks.iso /media/iso
>using a decade old OS
>wtf why is it outdated
The state of nig/g/ers
This, its simple and fantastic
we still could mount isos for free even back then
OP here, I looked it up and you are right, thank you.
You use the mount command not for just iso, but for anything you can mount on a computer
It doesnt work for the iso format because it was programmed to do it, but since everything in linux is a file including devices, mount just mounts files onto devices
i don't use wine or libreoffice, because they are just recreations of literal children's tools
For typesetting I use LaTeX, the thing that actual scientists use for writing academic papers.
Most of the software youll ever need has been on linux not since 2009 but since the 90s or sometimes the 80s
Windows just has the same programs but with a "fancy" gui to make it easy for double digit IQ users
I don't know why you would want to use poweriso but just use x64dbg to get it for free
*mount mounts files onto folders
This one is perfect
Wait wait, let me get this straight. You use a command line.
To work with something graphical.
In 2019.
That is pretty pants-on-head retarded. Do you also navigate your computer's filesystem, blindly, via feeling the vibrations of your hard drive? Do you only read books via text-to-speech? Why the fuck would you work on a PAPER DOCUMENT in a COMMAND LINE? These things do not compute.
Actually you've posted the best.
Same reason you write a website on text
It's literally the same thing,. The modularity of how you type. You can just type all the text you need and then you can just change the way it looks later with much gretar ease than a WYSIWYG editor such as word.
Latex is not the conventional way of writing documents for no reason.
the pdf documents can be seen updated live as you type anyway so it doesn't matter anyway since this means it can do what word does anyway
how bout daemon tools?
>Same reason you write a website on text
See, this is the result of your workflow. You type shit to type it, and it doesn't make any sense to the other end. How do you "write a website" ON TOP OF "text"? This brings a whole new meaning to the word "tablet"; nigga we talkin' cuneiform out here.
>It's literally the same thing,. The modularity of how you type.
Two things here: 1, I am a firm believer in modularity. Don't get me wrong. But 2: IT'S NOT THE SAME THING. Having a screen to display what you're working on is the difference between a computer and a typewriter.
Which begs the question: why not use a typewriter? Your argument applies the exact same way. If you mess up something, just make another one. No big deal.
>Latex is not the conventional way of writing documents for no reason.
You double-negatived your way into ambiguity, champ.
>the pdf documents can be seen updated live as you type anyway so it doesn't matter anyway
Who the fuck works with PDFs outside of finance?
>since this means it can do what word does anyway
Except directly edit the most ubiquitous document format on the planet. And, y'know, create one-inch margins without an autistic Talmudic understanding of command-line arguments.
this
Daemon tools was my go to during XP and W7 era
daemon tools lite, I've unironically been using it for like, 12 years now. the fact that only one user has posted it so far is baffling
this
Agreed.
Is it called WinCDEmu because Australians have such low internet speeds, they can only download CDs instead of DVDs?
Most virtual disc mounting software don't support mounting audio cds, and alot of old games are Redbook audio discs with game data in the pregap.
None of the truly free disc mounting programs support them on Windows as far as I'm aware, but cdemu on Linux does. You could install something like Alcohol, but it comes prepacked with adware, ended up just pirating it.
that's all you could do tho
why do people even mount. just open the iso and click setup.exe you plebs.
I was telling them at the start of the thread.
The fastest and most reliable "ISO mounting application" out there is 7z. Just, you know, minus the mounting part.
32 replies and no one saud Rufus...
No-one said vlc either
I always used daemon tools.
If you must use third party software wincdemu is the best one
Rufus is for writing them to a USB drive not mounting them
It doesn't mount audio tracks.
dumb fuck
Windows 8.1 has one built-in.
You're bad at this. Consider suicide.
Daemon tools
mount -t iso9660 -o loop /home/terry/templeos.iso /mnt/iso/
Fucking based.