Separate screens makes playing vidya on multiple clients simpler and is cheaper/m3 of screen space.
Prove me wrong
Jose Bailey
Kayden Cooper
38 inch ultrawides have been a thing since 2017, but I guess googling is too hard these days
Hudson Ross
... inches are from opposing corner to other, so you are looking for one wide ass monitor if you want widescreen to be as tall as 32" 16:9
Hunter Harris
When one monitor breaks, you don't have to order a new one.
Ian Barnes
I have a 43" 4k 60hz IPS panel and a 27" 1440p 144hz VA panel for fast paced gaming
Best of both worlds.
Jack Bell
I believe ideal aspect ratio depends apon screen size, for a small screen 4:3 is best for small netbooks, 3:2 for mid sized laptops. For big 24" monitors 16:10, for more than that 16:9 up to ultrawide. The reason is that it's ergonomic to turn your body to the left or right to see the content on the outer parts of the work area but really uncomfortable to stare up so you can see the upper part of a screen, The massive screen you show has too much vertical space which is suitable for a TV use but not monitor use. The 3 screens showed below the image is much more suitable for a computer desk due to the ultrawide aspect ratio the 3 monitors together use.
Isaiah Gonzalez
my nigga
Eli Taylor
The only issue is the refresh rate and the lag latency. I have zero clue if the standard of HDMI 2.1 will fix this next year or even if 2.0 will be enough. Maybe someone can Chime in here. But honestly the best option is a Ultrawide with a full HD 23 inch monitor on the side with a swirve stand. That is kino tier setup.
William Young
I meant what I said. I don't want an ultra ultrawide monstrosity. 21:9 is the problem, fuck that.
I'd fucking love somewhere around 17" tall, 40" wide.
Christian Gonzalez
>removed some fucking mosquito from my screen
>it left a fucking blood stain
RRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE