compubench.com
Daily reminder that when you spoof the vendor ID of Ryzen chips to Intel, Intel gets btfo harder than WW2-era Japan.
Daily reminder that when you spoof the vendor ID of Ryzen chips to Intel, Intel gets btfo harder than WW2-era Japan
Isaiah Gomez
Other urls found in this thread:
software.intel.com
agner.org
twitter.com
Zachary Powell
SHUT IT DOWN
Jaxon Robinson
Never heard of compubench before so who cares.
John Anderson
I can’t reproduce your table, OP. Give us the link directly to that page.
Oliver Murphy
>doesn't matter ©
Noah Baker
I did, I used a search term in the box to search for ryzen. Without using a search term, intel ryzen still is near the top
Easton Lopez
This link you gave us literally doesn't matter.
Robert Green
That list holds absolutely no evidence to support your claim.
All you did was look up Zen CPUs and sort from best to worst.
Blake Cooper
...
John Rivera
How do I spoof the vendor ID?
Jace Harris
Jacob White
In this image you are showing APUs with acceleration enabled versus a non-GPU server processor.
Aaron Robinson
Colton Kelly
In this image you are showing an "Intel Ryzen Threadripper" barely faster than a 9900K
The 1950X has twice as many cores/threads.
Where is OPs magic speed boost?
Stuff like optical flow and face detection rely on floating point - Intel has pure 256-bit FPUs while Zen1 only has 128-bit
Twice as many cores, half the FPU data bandwidth, the same performance.
Makes sense, instead of OPs dumb shit.
Kill yourself.
Nolan Perry
I really thought they stopped doing this.
seems like people stopped complaining about while it kept going on.
in other words: they successfully shut it down for about 10 years.
Aaron Wood
Andrew Adams
The point is that at the same price point AMD is better, and new Ryzen cpus coming out soon. Intel actively sabotages AMD benchmarks with unoptimized instructions when the vendor isn't Intel. The threadripper is at 3.4GHz vs a whopping 5GHz intel cpu.
Bentley Morales
A 1950X happily pushes 4Ghz on all cores while a 9900K will boost to 4.6Ghz on all cores.
Why are you shill posting this hard?
>the point is AMD is better at the same price
Yeah, everyone knows this, it's been a known thing since Zen originally launched.
Like what are you trying to prove here?
>Intel actively sabotages
I literally debunked your choice of benchmark and CPUs in this post You must be some stinking street-shitter Indian getting payed 10 rupees per post
Dominic Lopez
>Intel actively sabotages
>I literally debunked your choice of benchmark and CPU
Non-sequitor
>A 1950X happily pushes 4Ghz on all cores while a 9900K will boost to 4.6Ghz on all cores.
Boosts to 5GHz look it up
1950x doesn't boost, it has to be overclocked
Cope harder
>You must be some stinking street-shitter Indian getting payed 10 rupees per post
You call me a shill and then shill for intel?
Good goy
Ian Carter
>the list is too long to fit in a single post
lmao
Colton King
>look it up
5Ghz is the single-core turbo for a 9900k
4.6Ghz is the 8-core turbo.
4.2Ghz is the single core turbo for a 1950x
4Ghz is the 16-core turbo.
>look it up
I don't have to. Computer hardware is one of my hobbies.
>1950x doesn't boost
you're a total retard
>cope harder
I'm explaining reality to a dumb faggot
>you shill for Intel?
Explaining reality =/= shilling.
You're lying for a company that is winning.
You're the shill.
Grayson Flores
Why doesn't AMD have their own compiler, user?
Why do people complain that Intel isn't building their compiler to optimize specifically for their direct competitor?
Dominic Lee
you're literally defending intel for being anticompetitive
Jack Harris
I'm not supporting anybody you dense turd,
I hate liars and I hate people spreading bad information.
If you're OP you're both of those things.
Josiah Price
why can't intel support the standards?
Daniel Garcia
You do understand that a company cannot directly copy another company's hardware right? That it's theft of property if they try to?
So every CPU maker has a different physical implementation, and a different software path for their CPUs?
So it's impossible for there to be a "CPU standard"
Just how fucking dumb are you?
Juan Johnson
they do.
people just don't use it.
Zachary Davis
isa's ARE standardized.
x86 is a standard.
AMD64 (x64) is another standard.
Wyatt Cook
>a company cannot directly copy another company's hardware right?
also, that was kinda funny.
they actually do. legally, I mean what are the cross licensing deals that define our reality as it is?
Isaac Edwards
Reminder it doesn't matter how bad Zen 2 will be, AMD will still outsell Intel pozzed housefires.