8K

For /tv/ and text 1080p is based on 2x" screens
For anything else it's dogshit especially with 3k-8k becoming standard.
Even regular 1440p is out of date by more than a decade now

8K 32:9 HDR10 144Hz when? I will stay on my Asus V223W until then or it dies

>suddenly P3 is the gold standard for color gamut
The standard for photography is still AdobeRGB, and the Dell covers it fully. Even still, it covers 98% of P3, and usually anything above 95 is considered wide coverage.
Otoh, Apple made sure to only mention P3, which tells me it very likely falls behind at the rest, and their intended market is just movie production.
>why movies user?
P3 gamut is the standard used for accurate color reproduction on projectors

Attached: fapo_3M01_may2013-LoRes.png (313x314, 85K)

>Otoh, Apple made sure to only mention P3, which tells me it very likely falls behind at the rest, and their intended market is just movie production.
apple displays are usually around 70-80% coverage of adobergb

notebookcheck.net/Apple-iMac-Pro-Xeon-W-2140B-Radeon-Pro-Vega-56-Review.313558.0.html#toc-display-5k-retina
notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Pro-15-2018-2-6-GHz-560X-Laptop-Review.317358.0.html#toc-display-macbook-pro-2018-adds-truetone

There already are 8k tvs with 99% P3 and 1000+ nits available. Also 8k oled, but that would be around 900 nits, still better contrast than any lcd.

My monitor does 68% and it’s a 27” tn, what kind of cheap stuff are they selling at apple stores?

Consumer grade TVs are a billion times better than consumer grade monitors.

If by better you mean high lag and low ppi then they’re definitely better.

meanwhile new samsungs have like 6ms of input lag compared to 13ms of 4k 144hz hdr10 gsync x27 monitor

Is current DP or HDMI even capable of 144Hz 8k.

>270 nits

OH NO NO NO NO NO

PFPFPFHAHAHAHAHAHAA

>when linus the tech pinus is better at digesting info then Jow Forums.
When did this board get run by underage faggots?

when nu/v/eddit r/pcmasterrace and r/buildapc faggots infested this place with their desktop, battlestation and headphone generals.

>12k

Get on my level.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-05-10-59-35-942_org.mozilla.firefox.png (1080x2160, 439K)

>The standard for photography is still AdobeRGB
Wrong
Adobe RGB is garbage no serious photographer uses it.

>Adobe RGB is irrelevant for real photography. sRGB gives better (more consistent) results and the same, or brighter, colors. Using Adobe RGB is one of the leading causes of colors not matching between monitor and print. sRGB is the world's default color space.

16K? Why do u need 32K for

>sRGB
You're gonna need to try harder than that

Attached: e9d.jpg (600x600, 18K)

Your going to need to do your own research

You 2 retards should start your own Chan.

>shows scan image of testicles

Bold.

Is that a ballsack?

>Human eye at 20/20 being able to even see past 5K
Learn biology.

Attached: johnathan.gif (326x250, 626K)

Is it even HDR?

>Confusing breasts with ballsacks

Attached: 1553179317026.png (1440x1557, 738K)

MACTODDLERS BTFO

Attached: 1534950134223.gif (500x491, 376K)

I sure wish my balls had nipples!

would you believe that the imagination of iCucks is limited to the glans and scrotum??

Attached: 1559719859124.jpg (251x242, 8K)

I use Sony A7iii and always uses sRGB.
AdobeRGB is such a mess for my works.

Attached: ProsCons.jpg (710x304, 68K)

>8k at 30fps
or
>1080p at 144fps

You must choose, anons.

Attached: pepe2.jpg (499x481, 28K)

what could this possible be used for? i have a 4k monitor and it's a pain the ass to use.

wrong pic but u get the point