OH NO NO NO NO
NEW FIREFOX LOGO
Other urls found in this thread:
cnet.com
twitter.com
Snakefox?
I understand the push to streamline the design and push for lowres usage and all but you have to draw a line somewhere. This is just becoming ridiculous
At least its not totally flat
Still better than Waterfox's new logo.
The old one, for comparison.
looks nice
Damn boy, this looks like some wordpress bullshit
Man, that sucks - Ausfags will know why. Pic related
this is my firefox logo
Looks fine.
But it's pretty stupid that they're moving closer and closer to chrome's logo.
No need to cry over this, icon changers exist you fucking tards
Wow, thank you Captain Obvious
wtf, I like firefox now
the logo is good,
shut up
It's like that logo simplification meme made reality
Imagine getting this triggered that a company changed their logo slightly lmao
Imagine feeling the need to even say this
I'll stop talking shit when people stop making retarded threads
It looks good, not too bright or uniform looking. I vastly prefer gradients to pure flat or monocolour logos.
Wow, I think it's actually worse than both of the other suggestions.
I was looking up info about this and stumbled across some guy that literally does Mozilla's support FOR FREE.
How fucking sad can you get?
What was wrong with the old logo?
Not transgender enough.
Looks surprisingly fine to me tbqh.
Where's the rainbow fag colours????
Thank god Pale Moon's logo is still aesthetic as fuck and not some focus-tested cancer.
Unbranded Firefox still looks better and isn't made by a retarded furry.
At least furries can make a better browser.
Tranny fox
Enjoy your ancient browser with tons of security flaws.
Looks good
The one in the last thread was shit tho
who gives a fuck
TenFourFox coming through
Looks pretty cool IMO
the "globe" (literally just a blue ball at this point) is too fucking small.
>Enjoy your ancient browser with tons of security flaws.
Proof, shill?
do these faggots do anything but rebrand, do any actual programmers work for mozilla still
When the new only satisfies the masturbatory needs of their designers and only changed for the sake of chasing trends, then yes it's bad. Good logos doesn't need change and they are timeless.
System 2 actually looks pretty good ngl
remember this?
Yes
It's kinda cute ngl
Cutefox UwU
cute logo mozilla!
remember lolifox?
Whatever. I can't work myself up over every single logo change. Takes too much energy. Save it for when it's actually an indicator of a problem.
>name
kek
Is anyone else triggered as fuck they changed the logo but not the start menu/shortcut icon? Reminds me of how Microsoft frequently redesigns their interface then leave half the system out of it and stuck with an old design.
Life imitates memes
I like them both
It was supposed to be a fucking joke
This looks fine but they should add the paw then it won't look like Firesnake
Why do people use firefox again? So overrated, tried using it twice and came back to chromium. A shame, it almost died.
GRADIENTS BRAH.
Still not worse than waterfox but it's getting there.
I think it looks good.
I know YOU do.
This
What's the state of Jow Forums that a major thread is on the aesthetic changes to a logo?
Yeah, I do. That's why I changed the default error page to this.
>invisible tits
>netscape
Found the boomer
it's not really about the logo though, its about what it MEANS
It's literally chrome.
What did they mean by this?
we need to go back
What is wrong with that? People need help and don't know enough to Google it.
Icecat has a nice logo of a kitty getting comfy
>t. NiceUser
Now I do, good times
Me too user, it's okay.
Why is the planet purple?
I like it other than the world.
The world is not purple. That's a grape.
Flat is future. The future of design, and there are many good reasons for that. Logo owners understand those reasons and craft the logos in accordance to those.
The first reason is simplicity. It's simple for the makers, low effort and low cost. Designers will work less and corporations will pay less for design of a logo. You might not understand this if you are a NEET whatsoever.
The second reason is that detailed logo is unnecessary. You will be seeing it as a small icon and perhaps on their website. At most you will look at it for couple of seconds before moving to something else. I doubt you spend your time staring at logos.
The third reason would be ease on the eyes. You might like how old logos looked, but simpler logos are easier on the eyes. Bright colours and complex shapes take more brain power to be processed. Logos should be simple and easily processable.
The final reason is the innovation. Logo is something by which you recognise a company. If the logo changes, it represents that the company is changing a lot. Nevertheless, the core stays the same so you still know it when you see it, but you also see the change in the industry and the company.
>Flat is future
I can't wait.
Is she 18?
Can someone explain to me why companies feel the need to change their logos so often anyway? It's fine as it is, just fucking leave it alone. This extends specifically to website and program interfaces and layouts too. I probably log in to my old hotmail account once every few months, and it's different every time. Why? It's usually worse and it just confuses people, why spend money changing it? All of my rage.
>The fox is enclosing more and more the circle
soon...
I like it desu
>Fox lost his arm
Firefox..... Firefox had a hard life.
that's my grandma you sick fuck
>having a sagging fetish
looks trash but idc it's just a logo you can always change it.
It means Firefox.
I hate how fag colors are being forcefully integrated into everything now.
DELETE THIS
>colours from the rainbow are fag colours
Yeah, you're right, no such thing is possible.
Can't fap to this.
I like it. What's wrong with it?
Use a tiling window manager and write your own homepage and you'll likely never see it
>What's wrong with it?
memes imitate life
i liked these 3 from the dev edition
sorry but the weight on this new logo is off (as in, if you were to make a wooden cutout of it, and try to balance it by its center, it'd fall)... there's more on the bottom than on the top
the smaller globe will look jarring as it creates a 3d context, yet the logo pretends it's 2d
kind regards from /gd/