Considering all of Japan IQ and industriousness, why did they fail to dominate the aerospace, software markets etc etc

Considering all of Japan IQ and industriousness, why did they fail to dominate the aerospace, software markets etc etc.

Attached: images(6).jpg (678x452, 18K)

Because you're a weeaboo giving JP too much credit. They also started catching up quite late in world history. They were samurai until admiral Perry sailed into their bay.

Aerospace is a money sink and software is mostly outsourcing.

Is Japan still depended on USA R&D?
After reading the book "BUYING THE. AMERICAN MIND. Japan's Quest For U.S. Ideas. In Science, Economic Policy. And The Schools. Stephanie Epstein." Japan only dominates where the USA allows them to have access to its R&D.

because japan is culturally cucked. there's only so much you can do when your whole mindset is to "not do anything disruptive" or "bother anyone"

This.
Look up the economic bubble in the 80s.
The state ministry of finance had total control over the distribution of funds where its necessary for economic growth causing massive success of the Japanese.
This didn't last as American backed government change and a new finance minister "opened" the market and allowed for central banks to operate in Japan.
This crashed the economy and Japan today has incredible debts to pay.

>what is economies of scale

Unironically China will do that

Because IQ doesn't matter when your culture actively hates change.

they invest in what is profitable to them - cars, electronics, infrastructure, real estate

hating change is stupid. the whole universe in a change (a process).

Japanese know that very well.

Since Japan was poor as fuck until super recently. Made in Japan had the same stigma as Made in China does now until the 1980s. They were the China of 30-40 years ago. The USA also tried a massive neoliberalisation push with them, like they did with South Korea. Although it failed, it cemented liberalism in Japan instead of it being more state capitalism Vs market socialism Vs liberalism.
So that helps contribute to the two lost decades and Japan moving more towards cultural exportation as soft power projection, where the only place the government retains funding is some research but it tends to be very market based and only in markets they were established in before the bubble burst.

Japan was only successful from using western ideas and solutions. They are not special, they just happened to have great westerners like Peter Drucker, and Edward Demming facilitate quality brands. At least they had the good sense to listen to these guys.

i have no idea what i'm talking about: the post

sounds like they're in need of some diversity

I feel like it's every post in this thread. They should at least try to suggest some terms so that someone can google some articles.

learn2engrish you fucking retard. Nobody indulge this pajeet any further.

Attached: image.jpg (1043x1345, 247K)

Relatively low IQs, low testosterone, low autism.

Are you genuinely retarded?

Forgot extremely high agreeableness.

Most of Japan debt is owned by Japan and japenese compagnies.

this is the only correct answer in this thread.

but they didn't fail to dominate the software market though
And pretty much every country failed to dominate the aerospace market

Amerimutt protectionism

>Relatively low IQs
wut

Aero because wwii.
Software because they like to use old software.

Resources, they don't have it. One of reasons they went all in into WW2

This. They need more black people to push innovation.

This. They need more black people to be able to reach and push into Japanese Cervixes.

Group 1: High variance, average IQ 100 -> relatively high IQs
Group 2: Low variance, average IQ 105 -> relatively low IQs
Group 1 has higher IQs. Japan is group 2.
Example:
Group 1: 60, 100, 140. One high IQ.
Group 2: 100, 105, 110. No high IQs.
Asian peoples, including Finns, tend to have highish average IQ but relatively low IQs. European peoples have higher variance.

IQ doesn't matter. It never did.
this is the only based and true reason

>this is what 2 digit-lets actually believe

Leave, brainlet.

If America was 100% anglo would that change?

Attached: 9497204.jpg (640x480, 63K)

Source?