phoronix.com
>If taking a look at the geometric mean across the dozens of benchmarks carried out, both the Core i5 8400 and i5 9400F basically have around 18% lower performance from these default/out-of-the-box mitigations on Linux systems for Meltdown, Spectre, L1TF/Foreshadow, and MDS/Zombieload.
>18% lower performance
>18%
Thats probably around Ivy Bridge / Haswell tier performance. In 2019. Intel BTFO.
Other urls found in this thread:
support.microsoft.com
phoronix.com
twitter.com
Then what is the performance hit for Ivy? Asking for myself.
IT'S A LIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Probably the same -18%. Could put it at Nehalem/Westmere performance I think.
>Nehalem/Westmere performance
YIKES
Intel status: M I T I G A T E D
Well, at least I do not do CPU intensive tasks.
Actually -18% would put Ivy Bridge somewhere between Penryn and Nehalem. Thats 2008 performance level.
This is probably the biggest x86-64 security disaster in the history of CPUs.
>18% performance lost forever
holy shit, this is class action suit level stuff