Now that Youtube is officially evil, will people come to their senses and start making their own websites again with written content or are people too brainlet to read for more than 2 minutes?
Now that Youtube is officially evil...
Like when normalfags realized facebook is evil and stopped using it?
>Now that Youtube is officially evil,
how? I haven't been in touch to the news recently.
>will people come to their senses
Have you met people?
YouTube CEO had child slavery farm in Cambodia.
Youtube decided to ban hate speech and holocaust denial videos and now Jow Forums is having a meltdown as if Jow Forums were using the Youtube botnet in the first place or as if Jow Forums was a racist board.
They just need to have sex
They just banned some neo nazis retard.
Have you interacted with the average person anytime after 2001?
If you think anything will change you are either clinically retarded or have been born 5 minutes ago.
they demonetised a bunch of supremacist channels. yt being yt, they fucked it up horribly and got both left leaning and right leaning "innocent" channels in the crossfire.
a lot of people say it has something to do with Crowder harassing a journalist, and the journalist speaking out but it seems unlikely that a billion dollar company would act on a single person harassment claim in such a way — more likely its coincidence
And Coca Cola Company has been shooting their escaped child slaves and sending death squads to quash labour strikes in SA but you don't see people breaking out the rope and decorating the streets with CEOs.
I'm not talking about the average normalfag that just watches normalfag shit. I'm talking about people with a fanbase. The conspiracy theorists and alternative journalists all started out on written word on their own website. Then platforms came and took away the need to make their own. People who claim to be "redpilled" should have no problem staying off youtube and video media for their information.
>but you don't see people breaking out the rope and decorating the streets with CEOs
If that were the case Nestle would by far be the first company to get hanged from the CEO to the guy cleaning the toilets.
I don't expect you to keep up on internet drama but, youtube was actively replying to the Crowder thing.
Twitter mobs made them go back on their own statements multiple times.
And journalists wrote a metric fuckton of articles about youtube allowing hateful content.
So youtube added more shit to their "hate speech" definition and fucked over lots of channels.
100% because crowder made fun of some fag and youtube didn't delete his channel right away
You're the retard here if you really believe they will only ban nazis.
Conspiracy nutter are average people and they do it for the money and the fame not because they want to expose the man or whatever. They will stay on YouTube and nothings gonna change that.
And actual journalists never used YouTube in the first place. Unless by journalists you mean the retards flinging shit on youtube and calling it news.
Crowder isn't a Nazi, he's a homosexual Canadian who likes playing dressup.
>And actual journalists never used YouTube in the first place
Yeah they like using their own even shitter video players.
>a homosexual Canadian
Pleonasm.
Video hosting, cataloguing (searching), and display, should be all separate.
It's not about the banning that is the problem, it's the promotion of (((trusted content))) over the amateur videos and that goes for ANY youtuber that isn't a (((trusted media company))). This doesn't hurt just nazis or conspiracy theorists. Youtube is turning into television.
if this was just about Crowder and Carlos, they would've banned Crowder when it was first reported. this is youtube being completely incompetent, and selectively applying it's own rules whenever they feel like it. it really wouldn't surprise me if theyd been planning this kind of purge for a while and just waited till they had a scapegoat so all the altright don't get pissed at them
The problem is, even with how big youtube is, it doesn't make money.
It's infrastructure is a money sink, the only reason it exists is because google lets it exist.
Unless you've got a cash cow you can tap for the infrastructure, you're shit out of luck running an ACTUAL competitor site.
Google is just virtue signalling their zionism-compliance to avoid getting broken up.
He hides his Canadianness like he hides his gayness.
We don't need alternative news in video form!
>if this was just about Crowder and Carlos, they would've banned Crowder when it was first reported.
But he did nothing wrong.
Youtube's first reply was that his content didn't violate their TOS.
Then journalists started writing articles about youtube allowing homophobic/hateful content on youtube.
By the way, do you realize that Youtube is now THE mainsteam internet entertainment? Just like Google is synonymous with Internet for many.
And all of this was achieved because they offered convenience. If you want to win, be convenient.
>Unless you've got a cash cow you can tap for the infrastructure, you're shit out of luck running an ACTUAL competitor site.
We need to go back to 360p. h265 would bring a 10 minute video down to the size of fuckall.
How are you gonna pay for all the hardware to do that encoding?
You realize H265 isn't royalty free right?
If people didn't switch when google plus was implemented they probably never will. There have been so many fuck ups regarding youtube and there's no plausible alternative at this point. I doubt things will ever improve.
>You realize H265 isn't royalty free right?
What??
You do realise that H265 is not royalty free? And that you need a fuckton of computing power? And the costs for the datacenters? The cost for all the traffic from T1s? You do realise that the networking equipment costs alone would be high enough to bankrupt a dozen fortune 500 companies?
it is not really about being lazy to read. It is just that i can watch videos and get the information much faster and even without looking at my phone. When I travel, I would much rather listen to some Sargon video and look at nature than stuck my head in the phone.
I mean they already use VP9 and libvpx is shit.
If you're running a website, you can't compress your videos with H265 unless you pay the MPEG consortium royalty fees.
It's why most sites don't use H265, they use H264 which is older and cheaper, or they use open source stuff like VP9, or are looking to move to AV1.
But we don't need a competitor site. We just need regular written media sites.
It's not like encoding VP9 on a massive scale is gonna be cheap either.
that would have been less evil than what they did....
>have sex
Yes goy, destroy your dopamine receptors.
Can't you just... come up with your own video encoding?
How is written media not convenient? It's much faster than watching a fucking video. Anyone worth their salt should have no problem setting up their own blog site. If they're important their fanbase would follow.
Google has been trying for years.
>2019
>reading
That's like playing a turn based game when you could be playing Warframe.
I wasn't even arguing for an alternative, I was arguing the OPPOSITE. No alternatives at all, no platform.
Normalfags don't like reading. Mundane Mitt was able to survive just reading the news.
>implying turn based combat isn't better
I know, i'm responding to the real argument, not the OP's autistic rant.
or we could make P2P network that downloads stuff from yt like JDownloader but also shares it with other peers
The only thing video media is useful for for information use is for instructions and tutorials, not for news or politics. That's brainlet shit.
I may try to use bitchute
Normal fags still use fb owned apps like (((Instagram))) and fucking messenger. Holy fuck normies are stupid.
What real argument? How Was the rant autistic?
No, my point is to stop using platforms for information and get information directly from people.
Turned based is boring compared to say, Warframe, Halo or TF2.
>What real argument? How Was the rant autistic?
The real argument that's been happening for years, we need an actual alternative to youtube.
I just dont see it happening for reasons I already explained above.
The only people who use facebook now are boomers. The zoomers all use instagram and snapchat.
When did I argue for an alternative? I'm arguing for no alternatives mr brainlet.
You're all fools, all you're doing is telling people to rely on someone to do you own fucking work for you. If I had something to say I wouldn't need someone else's fucking platform to do it. That's literally just using someone else's property. Make your own fucking property and people will follow you to your property.
Oh so you build your own server, network, language, compiler, and website from scratch with resources you dug up from the earth with your own tools you build from the wood you got from your own private forest?
We don't need alternatives, we don't need bitchute, we need our own spaces. The internet is the platform. Not these hosts with all the control. Fuck everyone in my thread trying to strawman me into claiming I promote alternatives.
I was talking about the page itself, not everything else. I was talking about the internet here, not actual property, that was just a model.
Are people willing to torrent regular videos that aren't pirated content?
...again you're just not reading me.
I'M NOT REPLYING TO YOUR ARGUMENT BECAUSE YOUR ARGUMENT IS AUTISTIC.
I'm replying to the only REAL argument, which is for there to be an alternate youtube, which is what most threads in this post are talking about.
Not your autistic dumbass saying we need to have personal websites from the 90s.
Stop being a fucking retard.
based
So the internet doesn't rely on extensive networks owned by giant corporations? Got it. Fragmenting shit back to the 90s or "decentralisation" as is the new hip word of the day is not the solution to anything.
Isn't that what bitchute is all about?
You're the retard here. All the other idiots promoting alternatives and I'm the only smart one. My argument still stands, videos are for brainlets and there is literally no flaw to getting information by written pages. People who are intimidated by intelligence usually resort to saying it is autistic.
Someone has to own the pipes. You don't believe that hope is lost, do you?
Can't encoding happen client side when the user uploads the video with web assembly?
I read more than you retard.
I ALSO realize the value of video format because i'm not clinically retarded like yourself.
I don't see that catching on. Youtube is encoding the video into several different quality levels, and then broadcasts those different encodes to potentially hundreds, or thousands of concurrent users from across the world.
This isn't something you can just set up on a whim.
Call me a fatalist, blackpilled, a cynic, a retard, call me whatever you want. But if you believe that things are gonna change for the better I really don't know what to say. People won't be going back to visiting 200 different sites as is evident by comparing the number of "big" sites through the years since 1990. People are lazy first and foremost, and they won't give up the comfort of having literally everything they want in 3 or maybe 4 websites.
Fuck what youtube does.
Designing for the LCD really crimps your capacity, man.
There's nothing wrong with slavery if you grow your own slaves or buy them before they're 1 year old and not technically people.
>uses and requires cloudflare botnet
It's shit.
It's the only way a site will gain traction.
It's gotta be dirt simple and easy to use, and work flawlessly.
I think.
There was a specific video I was trying to watch on bitchute but the search wasn't brining it up so I didn't bother to learn how it works.
I'm gonna have to agree with you. For me, niche mode it the only way
DOJ will break up Goolag and Youtube will become a separate company
Oh yeah. I'm not trying to rebuild YouTube here. I know distribution will be a bitch in itself. I was just thinking for the specific problem of encoding, it's much cheaper to use the uploader's cycles.
cry harder
Found the incel
you are the one crying now, Google is going down - they have no allies anymore, both democrats and conservatives and half the industry are after them
Fair enough, well as a concept, it's possible.
It's just far too hardware demanding for most people to bother with.
Bitchute is getting traction. I like the idea.
>they have no allies anymore,
they have billions of allies worldwide.
Sure thing they are gonna broken up, just like wall street and the banks got broken up 2008. If you actually believe jackshit is gonna happen you really need to terminate your host process immediately.
Yeah, just like it happened to pewds and before that with the hit pieces that made major brands pull out from youtube. Total coincidence.
Google is heavily investing in India.
have kids
> Youtube is officially evil
Like Hitler, so YT is /ourguy/, or not quite there yet?
around 90% of them are not neo nazis but just right wingers. I know that you lefties do not know the difference because I have spoken in real life with you and you are usually so poorly informed that you can place someone like Sargon at 5/10 right wing scale. Of course, given the Overton window of say murica, Sargon and Steven Crowder are actually to the right border, but this is only because the overton window is centred so far left that even Bernie sanders is a right winger.
this is a problem solved by people with brain long ago. Install "video blocker", write Trump in search and start banning MSM sources.
Otherwise just use the following json filter:
[{"key":"CNBC International TV","type":"channel"},{"key":"HuffPost","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Atlantic","type":"channel"},{"key":"Late Night with Seth Meyers","type":"channel"},{"key":"LastWeekTonight","type":"channel"},{"key":"CBC News","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Daily Show with Trevor Noah","type":"channel"},{"key":"Comedy Central UK","type":"channel"},{"key":"CNBC","type":"channel"},{"key":"Vox","type":"channel"},{"key":"Sky News","type":"channel"},{"key":"VICE News","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Wendy Williams Show","type":"channel"},{"key":"Global News","type":"channel"},{"key":"USA TODAY","type":"channel"},{"key":"Saturday Night Live","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon","type":"channel"},{"key":"TIME","type":"channel"},{"key":"Jimmy Kimmel Live","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Ring of Fire","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Late Show with Stephen Colbert","type":"channel"},{"key":"The Late Late Show with James Corden","type":"channel"},{"key":"Fox Business","type":"channel"},{"key":"ABC News","type":"channel"},{"key":"PBS NewsHour","type":"channel"},{"key":"MSNBC","type":"channel"},{"key":"NBC News","type":"channel"},{"key":"Guardian News","type":"channel"},{"key":"FOX 10 Phoenix","type":"channel"},{"key":"Real Time with Bill Maher","type":"channel"},{"key":"CBS News","type":"channel"},{"key":"Mashed","type":"channel"},{"key":"CBS This Morning","type":"channel"},{"key":"TODAY","type":"channel"},{"key":"BBC News","type":"channel"},{"key":"Fox News","type":"channel"},{"key":"Washington Post","type":"channel"},{"key":"CNN","type":"channel"},{"key":" CNN","type":"channel"}]
>why is a for-profit company doing things that increase its profit?!?!?
capitalistcucks are pathetic desu
Youtube is a shit resource. We can use actual food cooking videos as an example.
>want to learn to cook something
>search on youtube
>"hi guiz today we r gonna make..
>the individual has only made the recipe once before, there is no expertise, they are freestyling
YouTube is shit for real knowledge, content creators have no expertise at all.
>pkay all videos at x3 speed because the padding is so God awful, a one hour video can be digested in 20mins.
>make own video encoding
>accidentally use a technique covered by some random fucking patent
>get sued.
the fact that VP9 has survived with only one failed patent claim against it, is astounding. If AV1 legally survives, that would be even better.
Niet.
YouTube became evil the day Google (an advertising company) bought it.
Advertising has always been evil. I'm glad you woke up to recognize the corporate world.
lulz
and that's unacceptable.
Youtube was never about spreading knowledge, it's all celebrity level bullshit. If success was based on merit then we wouldn't have mouth breathers dominating the subscriber ranks. If you're not relatable to the viewer and have a personality that rubs people the wrong way then it's game over and it wouldn't matter how good of a cook you were.
to whom?
Most people don't give a fuck, and it's a private company, they have no legal reason to not ban who they want to ban.