Rekt

That's true, but the $1000 stand is still retardedly overpriced. They're not comparing against the XDR, just the stand.

What are you poor?
You can't afford apple products?
Don't be salty because you can't have it.

Attached: 1514363097583.jpg (600x600, 59K)

i dunno man seems like a nigger resolution to me. You can't even watch movies in it.

the screen is still nowhere close to Apple's. their screen is actually shit.
But Pajeets are gonna stay poor and post memes. kek.

>left is cheaper Apple wins again

Attached: iBrain.png (211x239, 12K)

this
it's actually the MSI monitor that's overpriced. "prestige" lol. does it even have 10-bit color?

imagine actually wanting to buy a less capable but still more expensive product

It sounds like the monitor has VESA compatibility built in, so they should add the Apple VESA adapter to the left to bring the price to around $1198.

you don't use the vesa adapter with the stand, you use it to mount the monitor to a different stand

>5K
is the perfect resolution that needs mass adoption.
it's 1440p but scaled, so you get both non poorfag screen estate and beautiful font rendering.

MACTODDLERS BTFO

Attached: 1550409354152.gif (540x540, 279K)

>Includes a stand
dude...

Attached: 1495594886284.gif (695x392, 2.24M)

the apple monitor has only a snowflake connection
to use it with any stand, you need to buy one or the other, the pro stand, or the vesa adapter to use it with any other stand

>going by horizontal resolution
4320p and 6480p sets are finally coming to the consumer market after almost two decades of being exclusive pro monitor use only. You'd be an absolute idiot to buy any monitors right now.

Attached: 1519405691825.jpg (399x462, 122K)

What exactly is beautiful about 1440p font rendering?

this is actually fucking cringe

>HDR 600
the apple one does HDR 1000-1600

the apple stand doesn't even have a display

Attached: 1559203087803s.jpg (125x125, 3K)

A shittier product is cheaper? No shit?

Hilarious.

the MSI Prestige is an ugly piece of plastic shit, despite what that promotional bullshot would have you believe. It's not even an actual 5K display.

9to5mac.com/2019/06/06/msi-mocks-apple-pro-display/

>However, as you’d expect, the MSI Prestige won’t offer near the same level of specs and performance that Apple’s 6K 32-inch Pro Display XDR will. The Prestige does have a slightly larger display at 34-inches, but notably, it’s not a true 5K panel. It’s actually a 5K2K resolution (5120 x 2160), uses USB-C instead of Thunderbolt 3, has a clunky plastic build (see photos below), and lacks a host of professional specs and other features found on the Pro Display XDR.

You guys are so desperate for your Apple hate fix that you're falling for cheap shit like this. You should really have more self-respect.

Attached: D8Y7KyAU8AADcNO.jpg (1200x900, 157K)

>that THICCnes

I'm getting 2006 vibes here.
Does it still have CCFL backlight?

but muh apple logo

It has a fucking motherboard though, why are you even comparing a fucking computer to a display?

>oh no its plastic I can't have that its not premium! Cheap ass aluminum is premium!

Attached: ffg.png (785x731, 197K)

>not ponying up for a stand when buying your workstation grade monitor
It's just a grand if you're buying expensive equipment this is not a big deal poorfag trashes

Attached: coin-flip-mcduck.gif (480x238, 414K)

It looks like shit. Don't pretend it doesn't. You can see the seams from the fucking ISS.

>SEEMS

I dont care if it has or doesnt have seems. Lack of seems isnt a thousand dollar feature.

Attached: ff_0.webm (960x540, 2.32M)

>6k
>5k
>5k2k

Attached: y8QhpI0ergRUqu_KDWOn0pynBTUyytjs3usY4nyU86g.jpg (399x209, 12K)

>5k is same pixel density as 4k

no, just depends on the size of the screen

based

It's a fucking monitor, not a fashion statement.

you mean the Apple display or this one?

Just get a fucking job, imbeciles.

>It's not even an actual 5K display.
It's what is known as a 5K Ultrawide.

I thought this place was the smart part of Jow Forums
They are comparing the display stand price to their display, not to the apple display, as in look what you can buy for the price of the apple stand

what?

the msi crap is worthless to someone who needs a pro grade monitor. this is just a publicity stunt for them to capitalize off of the clickbait articles about the apple stand.

That everybody is replying saying the apple display is better than the msi display
The image is not comparing displays: they are laughing at the apple display stand price, and what you can buy for that (the msi display)
Yes, we know it's not better than Apple's

is it out yet?

5K is just 1440p times 2, just like 4K is 1080p times 2.

>However, as you’d expect, the MSI Prestige won’t offer near the same level of specs and performance that Apple’s 6K 32-inch Pro Display XDR will
iDrones in full force defending their fucking screen, when the MSI add was attacking the fucking STAND.
You can't make this shit up.

it's like laughing at the price of carbon fiber wheels for a koenigsegg, who gives a shit if you can buy a car for the price of a set of wheels, it's just sour grapes

MSI has far inferior build quality, they're comparing apples to oranges (pun not intended), just because it has different functionality doesn't make it better value, MSI probably has a similar profit margin

It's perfect for what? There's barely any 1440p, forget 4K content and now 5K, whatever that is, is perfect?

are you fucking kidding me dude? apple has 250% profit margins at the very least

/thread

hahahahaha what the fuck is this shit
i mean sure applel's overpriced but the display's pretty nice to be honest
this is just trash

ycharts.com/companies/AAPL/gross_profit_margin

>uses USB-C instead of Thunderbolt 3
>Comparing a connector form standard to a protocol
Quality journalism right there

What the fuck is nano IPS
Serious qustion

As is the Apple stand, since you'd mount the monitor on a proper VESA compatible arm for any shit of serious work

dat bookish qt

>In the production of Nano IPS, a layer of nanoparticles (hence the name) is applied to the standard W-LED backlight of the screen. These absorb certain wavelengths of light, for instance absorbing unnecessary yellow and orange which in particular leads to more accurate red shades. From a technical/chemical point of view it is a KSF phosphor layer that is added (K2SiF6 doped with Mn4) and gives rise to the name “KSF LED” to describe the backlight unit. This KSF layer allows Nano IPS panels to offer a wider than normal colour space equating to 98% of the DCI-P3 reference, which is about 135% of the sRGB space. This allows support for HDR content and produces more vivid, bright and saturated colours.

>For reference, an alternative method you might hear talked about is “Quantum Dot” (more info below) which is something Samsung are investing in for instance. With Quantum Dot the nanoparticles are applied between the backlight and panel via a special film layer, and not directly to the backlight like with Nano IPS. According to LG.Display this results in a slightly lower DCI-P3 coverage from Quantum Dot displays, although in practice that doesn’t appear to be completely accurate. Our measurements so far of Nano IPS vs Quantum Dot colour spaces has been very similar in the desktop monitor market at least. There are also currently limitations in offering borderless panel designs with Quantum Dot it is stated.

>Other than this wider colour space there are no specific changes or improvements over older generation IPS panels being targeted. There are generational improvements in things like response times and refresh rate, but those are not specific characteristics of the Nano IPS technology.

tftcentral.co.uk/blog/3-display-technologies-you-should-know-about-nano-ips-quantum-dot-and-fald/

Wait, is that sand even height-adjustable?

Attached: aa7e3fe66c188d9d6f12a79adfbace72fc1236d66ef1b32f7d4978acf27a0894.png (1181x754, 301K)

What, the Apple one? Yeah, you just move the screen up and down magnetically.

youtube.com/watch?v=wl4Hg23RQHQ

You're the perfect definition of an incel

>unironically calling others incels on 4channel

Do you have that video with audio?

No sorry

>it’s not a true 5K panel. It’s actually a 5K
c'mon now, the horizontal resolution is about 5000, and that is the only requirement for the made-up usages of "K" resolution
none of those 3840x2160 panels are 4K either, but nobody complains about that
there's nothing fake about this, it's just not a 16x9 display (which is not unusual or deceptive)

imagine buying a monitor and not vr glasses.

4K is the accepted term for 16:9 2160p, saying 5K without specifying anything else implies that it's 16:9 2880p, it's embarrassing that OP's pic is the best they could come up with, it just makes them look cheap when you look into the worse specs compared to the apple monitor and plasticy build quality

>buying a monitor from a keyboard company

Attached: 1559412177019.jpg (630x420, 53K)

they make graphics cards and motherboards too

youtube.com/watch?v=kSCVahyh3Dk

>buying a monitor stand from a phone company

the only redeeming aspect of the ultrawide meme is that you can have a wider fov in games without perspective distortion (nvidia's simultaneous multi-projection was supposed to fix this but very few games support it), otherwise if you need more desktop space just do a multi-monitor setup

Attached: LazqC-x7YlK6hqBKlpr4_nmRb0HM2tlGiH25CPhW6bs.jpg (1200x628, 90K)

>without specifying anything else
it's pretty clearly not 16:9 by the photo

>keyboard company
I mostly know them for their motherboards.

they make keyboards?
i've only seen their motherboards and graphics cards

>msi
actual competition coming through

Attached: qwk6s[1].png (1081x740, 221K)

who the fuck is this retarded onions fag

For I am become soi, destroyer of worlds.

you can, its has about normal range of movement.

>no hdr
>brightlet (400cd/sqm)

I'm not seeing it.

MSI
Contrast: 1200:1
Nits: 500 typical, 600 peak

Apple
Contrast: 1,000,000:1
Nits. 1000 sustained, peak 1600.
>rekt

MSI
Contrast: 1200:1
Nits: 500 typical, 600 peak

Apple
Contrast: shiny
Nits: none, it's a fucking stand

Mactoddlers absolutely seething

Thank you for understanding the ad

3k here it's the new 720-480

Who gives a fuck about raw resolutions above 2k for high hz/fps gaming? No gpu on earth can push those clocks

>1000000:1
>comparing dynamic contrast with static contrast

Funny considering that for professional editing use Apple is poverty tier.

Apple is brightlet too.

People who are anti-Apple are just grabbing right onto this, ignoring Apple's obvious intention behind the product. Just LOOK at the design of the display and the stand. It's a heavy duty, well designed product for professionals.