Attached: .jpg (800x760, 81K)
Untitled
Benjamin Price
Other urls found in this thread:
Asher Bell
Jose Martin
>there are people browsing this board RIGHT NOW that still support intlel
Ryder Hughes
Funny how you get tons of shit for saying that 125w for an FX-8350 that offered good price to performance is literally blasphamy, but using 200w is not a big deal as long as it beats the 2700X by 30% at most at framerates over 144hz.
Logan Miller
Still faster than Poozen. Facts.
Jeremiah Cruz
Pottery
Mason Moore
Still not competing with Ryzen on price, but rather with 1st-gen Threadripper. There are some edge cases where the 9900K can make sense (dunno about this special edition, it'd depend on what it'll cost, compared to the 9900K) - but for most people who want/need to spend hundreds of bucks on their CPU, Ryzen 7, Threadripper, or a 9700K will be wiser choices.
Carter Martin
Intel will never compete with AMD on prices.
William Edwards
Coming next year the i9 9900KFC Extreme Deep Fried 5.5Ghz Edition. Yours for the low low price of $699 (chiller not included).
Kayden Russell
Really that cheap? From Intel? No way
Cooper Martin
>tfw Intel saw the make FX 9590 look like a joke meme and took it seriously
Robert Moore
>all these salty poodozer owners
Being early is the same as being wrong.
Eli Gray
Performance aside, Intel's thermal situation is worse than an FX chip, which performed pretty well multi threaded, used 50% more energy but cost less, Intel costs more, is about to get btfo by ryzen 3000, and the 14nm++++ chips are going to be using more energy than the 105w 3900X while performing worse.
Liam Cooper
All that price advantage evaporates when you have to go buy high speed ram and a 14 stage VRM’d active cooled motherboard with a laptop CPU for a southbridge.
It’s also been confirmed that rypoo3 is barely faster than the new incoming intel offerings anyway.
This is like the 5th new generation where delusional rypoojeets claim intel is finished.
Kayden Williams
The 3700X is going to outperform the 9900k at half the price. Even if you did have to spend an extra $150 on the motherboard and RAM you'd still save money vs. the 9900k. If you don't need PCIe 4.0 you can just get an X470/B450 board, and we still don't know what B550 boards are going to look like either.
Logan Evans
>14 stage VRM’d active cooled motherboard
>Highest end AMD chip on AM4 is 105w
Again, ignoring the power consumption of the CPUs for the performance it's gives, even if the 3700X was losing to the 9900K by 10% or whatever the fuck percent, it's still a 65w 8 core throwing blows with a turbo boos all core CPu that is definetly using more than 95w, cause that 3.6GHz base clock isn't gonna cut it against ryzen.
Jaxson Adams
>Believing AYYMD shills in 2019
lad, they've been saying Just Wait™ for decades. You want good performance and reliability? You buy Intel. You want superb FPS? You buy Intel. Let them shill their 9999 core cpu that still gets btfo'd by an Ivy Bridge. inb4 "muh vulnerabilities"
Evan Lewis
Ram is barely an issue in zen+ lmfao. 3200mhz low latency Samsung b die ram costs like 130$ for 16 gigs. You barely need that.
Cameron Collins
>buying a MITIGATED chip
Michael Baker
>btfo by ivy bridge
Source?
Brayden Hughes
>3700X is going to outperform the 9900k
imagine actually believing this
Gabriel Rodriguez
Already does
Bentley Gonzalez
It already does, that's the part that was used in the Cinebench demonstrations several months ago as well as Cinebench R20 and PUBG demonstrations at Computex.
Jack Bell
>65w power consumption while beating the 9900K doesn't matter!
Brody Howard
>demonstrations at Computex
I'm not an intel shill but believing that bs is plain stupid. Wait for interdependent reviews, nigger
Michael Anderson
H O L O C A U S T E D
Aaron Hernandez
the key to understanding the blank post is to look at the browser tab name
Thomas Ward
>youtube.com
>he doesn't use liquid nitrogen cooling at home