THE 5G ANTENNAS ARE IN MELTDOWN!

This man is in shock, get him to the infirmary.

Based jannies shadowbanning diarrheafags

>He thinks there are antennas on the roof

I miss asbestos.
Back in the day, you could remove wasp nests with blowtorch, now you will end up burning house.

I'm getting sick of this non ionising meme. For starters, electromagnetic fields can flip spin, which can change the state of radicals from singlet to a triplet state. This triplet state could induce mutations, but there isn't much study on specifically 5G. So my point is just being a non ionising radiation may not necessarily make it safe.

Fact nobody talks about: modern antennae can be hugely overloaded via malware like stuxnet.

It's almost like this thread is tech hate propaganda or something.

Typing this on my 5G phone, it's great!

Attached: adorable.png (300x100, 5K)

Your a tool.

So throw away your microwave user, it is giving your food cancer!
Retard.

I don't have a microwave, waste of money.

completely missed his point you fucking retard

You didn't see 5g antennas because they are not there.

What point, the point that 4G is more than enough forever in terms of speed? That we don't need 5G antennas?

>is more than enough forever in terms of speed?
Retards like you say this exact line every time a new technology threatens to offer faster speeds

Attached: 1557355305640.png (1300x1300, 118K)

>640kb should be enough for everybody

>For starters, electromagnetic fields can flip spin, which can change the state of radicals from singlet to a triplet state.
Point me to this pseudo-science.

There is nothing that can't run on 130mbos 4G. Look at the theoretical max speed of 4G.
There are still plans with data caps and these corrupt companies waste more and more money.
You can run smart cars, 4K streaming and augmented reality on 100-130mbps 4G. That's the use case for the next 10 years.

all these russian trolls being mad that they cant enjoy ultra fast 5g internet

Attached: The_Fox_and_the_Grapes.jpg (400x624, 61K)

There's one seething on /sci/ right now kek

as a retard this might surprise you, but massive (inter)national infrastructure projects often have a goal of greater than 10 years

5G is more focused for industrial applications.

The problem with 4G, and all wireless, is that the access point (tower) is a bottleneck.
One of the things 5G will result in is better load distribution.

That's not the use case for the next 10 years. They're going to ramp up the whole internet of things shit fast now. Everything from your coffeemaker to your underwear to your bananas are going to spy on you constantly and intensely. All this shit is going to need serious bandwidth.

Most upper class families don't own microwaves. Heating in the oven is way better

All theory, 4G antennas steadily and reliably supply contract speeds throughout the world.
5G, as a consumer-oriented technology, brings nothing new to the table and is still a waste of money
As a government-oriented tech, they have satellites and underground networks, they'll manage without this botnet.

Serious bandwidth such as 5kbps per device that's packeted compressed by the router?

Yeah, but it's going to be thousands of devices per household.

Just use the wifi...

What's it matter, The Cloud is largely controlled by FANG so just send a large packet to each and let the servers sort it out instead of constantly pinging kilobytes. Who am I kidding, modern programmers don't have engineering thought.
Let's replace statistics and mathematical formulas with AI, and brute force hardware

What are you on about? Do you think the coming surveillance grid is designed so that you control what data is passed to the botnet? That's why we need 5G, so the thousands of devices monitoring your behavior can communicate directly with the botnet without going through your wifi. Otherwise you could just pull the plug, which would defeat the whole purpose, pleb.

>All theory, 4G antennas steadily and reliably supply contract speeds throughout the world.
Uhuh. I can see you haven't traveled out of your small town.
I've seen the effects of large gatherings bringing towers to their knees. Even in the area I live in with good coverage I only get about 30/30 on 4G and it isn't that densely populated (just cellphone usage is high, it's more common for people to have a cellphone and/or pocketWIFI than a home internet connection).

For streaming 4k nigger tranny porn on your phone goy.

I fucking hate where we're headed.

is that the chernobyl show? is it any good?

You do realize I have to tell the moderators about this, right?

Attached: its disgraceful really.jpg (1920x1080, 298K)

Is russia pissed about the Chernobyl series? Is that why they're spreading this 5g nonsense?

> inb4 someone calls me a them

>Typing this on my 5G phone, it's great!
But USA only has fake 5G

theverge.com/2019/3/22/18277484/att-fake-5g-e-network-lte-study

theverge.com/2019/2/4/18211044/apple-att-5g-e-network-icon-iphones-misleading-ios-software-update-beta

howtogeek.com/399560/5g-e-isnt-real-5g.-heres-what-you-need-to-know/

>b-but your sources suck
deal with it, burger!

Not great, not terrible.

>But USA only has fake 5G
>AT&T is the only network in USA

Lmao, like people care about what is going through their router.
Nobody is going to filter every last url the botner uses, especially since you have to add them one by one, can't just upload a txt file

According to the HBO viral marketing department it's better than Breaking Bad.

In reality it's just thinly veiled virtue signalling.

Dunno if sarcastic or ignorant

For Europeans, it feels like a recollection. For Americans, it's to be a culture shock for how incompetent and corrupt USSR official were.

Nigger my hosts file is 60 megabytes.

>In reality it's just thinly veiled virtue signalling.
*tipping intensifies*

its quite good

They are building their own 5G Network lol

The Right Wing are just the new useful idiots for Russia

Scott Manley said it's pretty good.

how the fuck can you load pages at all. just get a decent firewall

Microwave heats up from the inside it s better than oven for many things.

Next topic.
Turn off mobile data. Turn off wifi. Turn off gps. Can I trust that my android doesnt use these when turned off? I know that in airplane mode your location is logged and then when I get back online that data is send to google. My bloat apps do the same I think.

Explain how a 5g network causes cancer?

No one knows if it does. We do know radiation causes cancer, but we don't know why or how much because we don't really know how and why cancer forms yet.

Yeah, and it only works for your computer. You need some dns fuckery in mobile devices, or just say fuck it and install a pihole

You are the ignorant my friend. You are thinking only about people who know techmology. Most people call the carrier if the wifi cable is unplugged from the router

Explain how gravity works :^)

>we don't really know how and why cancer forms yet.
Pretty fucking sure we know what DNA replication and mutations are, user.

Its imperialistic propaganda
SOVIET RUSSIA BAD
AMERICA GOOD

Yes, we have some idea in very general terms, but the specifics are still unknown.

It doesn't. You are delusional. Now climb up the antenna and tell me what you see.

Cars, smoking, sun baths, alcohol, burned meat, sugar, soda, and overweightness come first on my scale of possible carsinogens.

Like I said, we have some vague idea, but we don't know the specifics. We do know that heavy smokers or people who tan excessively have a higher cancer rate than the average population. But why does still 99% of heavy smokers not get lung cancer, while some who have pristine and clean lungs do? The specifics of the actual mechanism isn't known yet, which is why it's impossible to predict that someone will get cancer or not.

Because literally every second your body is playing a very good odds dice roll as to whether you're going to develop cancer. Smoking doesn't eliminate that dice roll, it just worsens your odds.

>But why does still 99% of heavy smokers not get lung cancer

Sources: dude trust me

What? I'm not defending smoking or excessive sunbathing or whatever? I'm just saying the actual mechanism that causes cancer to form is unknown. This is completely uncontroversial in academia and in research on the topic, so I have no idea why you're sperging out about this. Whether it's 99% wasn't the point, the point is that the vast majority of people who smoke or sunbathe or eat carcinogenic food in excess doesn't get cancer. And a number of people who don't get it too. This is not controversial either. We do know it increases the odds somehow, but what it is that actually makes the tipping point is unknown. We haven't discovered it yet.

Muh surveillance botnet is a meme for retards to distract them from the fact they aren’t really being watched by the gubmint, which is too inept to pull such a thing off. You are being commoditized by big tech so they can sell you shit.

>but the specifics are still unknown

Back to the point zero. Now explain me how non-ionizing radiation causes DNA damage?

Big tech is your gubmint you tool. The faggots you elect who run around rubberstamping whatever their corporate and intel overlords tell them aren't your gubmint.

I have no idea if it does, so I can't do that. Sorry.

It works like a vaccine does and causes cancer.

what the FUCK NO

Attached: 1537732044115.jpg (833x1080, 305K)

Vaccine is milder version of the disease. It's shell is small cant think it does much unless made badly.

5G is many times less powerful than microwave.
quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-5G-and-the-radiation-in-a-microwave-oven
androidauthority.com/5g-dangers-895776/
Cant see how this causes cancer. Russia just wants people to vote their canditates. My point of view.

>russia
>russia
>russia
Do you watch mainstream news? ONLEY RUSSIANS ARE NERVOUS ABOUT UNTESTED WIFI RADIATION ONLY THE RUSSIANS

Huh? If you're on android, just grab dnsfilter or blokada or dns66

And only the russians are sane enough to question before they believe.

How do we filter boomers from this site?

Attached: spectrum.jpg (619x389, 27K)

By posting objective, factual, peer-reviewed scientific evidence from multiple sources, that shows living directly next to a 5G antenna for a lifetime causes no health concernes what-so-ever.

>implying boomers will listen to actual science

Isn't that radar operators have higher incidence of cancers pretty well established by now? I have no idea about this shit and I have no idea if 5G is dangerous, so I have no agenda here, I just know that there was a big law case here in Norway some years ago where radar operators got compensated for work environment shit because of their higher incidence of cancers.

I will, I want proof that if I spend my life hugging a 5G antenna, I will have no health degradation from it at all. At all. If that's true, then living in a flat 50 yards from it will be safe as well.

>peer-review
You have all these rules and you think they'll save you.

Who has lived next to a 5G antenna for a lifetime?

top yourself

Bingo. There is no empirical proof 5G is safe.

Seems pretty simple logic to me. Low energy doesnt react with human cells. Gives slight heat that is less than what comes from visible light or microwaves. I would prioritize these allocate time 5000:1

>Seems pretty simple logic to me.
Understandable, can I see your diploma and research papers, please?

You cant use logic?
It is just a range of energy and from 0-20Mx doesnt do shit to atoms just makes them move less (give energy, heat up) than what light gives. There is no magic numbers in between at low levels only microwaves have special feature of reacting with water molecules. Plasma with grapes by microwaving.

The logic I'm making is that 5G shouldn't be implemented because
>it hasn't been proven useful
>it hasn't been proven safe
>latest 4G/LTE bandwidth standards thrash ethernet bandwidth

4G does not give enough bandwidth in big cities 5G would fix this. 5G is not fo rural areas 4G is enough with many towers.

It is useful but only for special niche.
It is safe and proven. No different from 4G or low level microwaves.

*Current 4G broadcast does not give enough bandwidth in some big cities
>safe and proven
Interesting, where can I read these objective etc facts?

60GHz 5g is actually safer than 4g. It doesn't penetrate walls so street 5g won't affect you at home. Even at the street clothes will absorb most of it, even then non-ionizing radiation is simply heat. If you install it at home it wouldn't need much power because there's no interference from the neighbours.
If you can't prove it's more dangerous than the sun you can fuck right off.