LOL

>expecting normies to buy a separate device for pictures
60% of them can't even find their phone & keys when it's time to leave.

based boomer

an entry level one with a kit lens sure

That camera AND the notch
Apple is laughing stock at this point
Trump will have to pull a national security emergency to save them from the chinks

oftbtfo

Attached: 7CFFACFD-FDEE-423B-A9B9-93F23666F828.jpg (675x675, 123K)

Samsung Galaxy A9 has 4 rear cameras and average image quality.

>Cause the photos of these could be the best photos ever taken by a phone, ever.
so still shitty overprocessed garbage?

>Literally a bowling ball design
>"Hamachi" brand
Fuck off capitalistic nigger.

Attached: slmfao_8kukpmtqcy.gif (310x211, 1.17M)

This, I have a DSLR with bluetooth and a crappy 2012 smartphone
No smartphone on earth will take photos as good on at least the next 10 years
and I can promptly post them on normie media because of connection

Want

Anyone with a dedicated photo device in this day and age is my friend not matter the size, what're you using?

Also 10x lighter.

Nikon D5600 w/ Sigma17-50mm/Nikkor35mm/ Nikkor70-300mm

Also 100x gayer

You should think twice, before posting.

Pretty based, I used the 35mm dx on my d7100 a few years ago, now I own a d810 and replaced it with the 45mm tamron, oh and I ended up breaking a 20mm af-d a while ago which hurts.
What 70-300mm? the crop one or FF one? because the FF is an underrated gem that'd been overlooked because it has the stigma of being a kit lens.

no

Fullframe lens are expensive on the shithole of a country where I live in :/
>now I own a d810
Neat

well, yeah? What do you think progress is?

Yeah, but you still fugly.

Attached: 1548688794703.gif (366x275, 1.68M)

>Canon
How is your IG of flower and leaf pics coming along?

Because we can only perceive 3 dimensional space.

It's a fun camera but it doesn't have any modern features like wifi, bluetooth(it doesn't even have infrared) and good video but it makes up for it in the sensor, compatibility to older and newer professional equipment and the autofocus being the same as the d4, it just takes photos and that's it, that's why I like it.
I always buy my shit used off ebay or locally, I wouldn't be able to own all this shit otherwise.
Rich old people in my country are really fast to sell their lenses and bodies for the latest gear because it will somehow make them take better photos, I'm sure you can find some of them as well, they're everywhere.
I also almost got fucked when getting the d810 because it was completely broken but I turned the situation into my favor and got one in mint condition for way cheaper so I was kinda lucky.

Are they buying Canons? I thought they were buying this garbage, pic related.

Attached: Big_pol2.jpg (1680x936, 183K)

>not showcasing the beautiful contrasty bokeh of your $3000 L glass that would make hipster girls cream their pants in a 200km radius
what are you? gay?

we're all in a simulation retard, we're just ones and zeroes. there's no real dimensions on a computer program.

Log me in

do you goys think there is any technical reason why they can't do it like this?
it's not like they need the space for a headphone jack?

Attached: itoddlerphone.jpg (711x704, 71K)

why don't they just bite the bullet and make the whole phones a single micron thicker
these stupid fucking bits that jut out for the camera lenses are fucking retarded, keep the phone from lying flat, and scratch up surfaces/get broken

lack of port forwarding knowledge has come flooding back

Better question is why don't they just take 3 pictures with one camera and use algorithms to improve quality in software. Hell they could even make dedicated hardware to do it to make it faster... oh wait Pixel already has this.

why do the 3 lenses look the same?

will they still have the fat notch?

Attached: iPhone-X-notch.jpg (1200x700, 83K)

With all three cameras being equidistant from each other, the dsp involved in manipulating or determining a common focal point is much simpler. Held parallel to the subject of the photo, all three lenses will have roughly the same focal point and (if capable) vary focus slightly to bring different planes of an object into focus. Doing this from a linear parallel perspective would lead to strange focal aberrations that would need to be accounted for with more complex code.
Also, design/manufacturing cost is more than halved when both phone models use the same camera suite. Producing separate suites for the phones would require different digital signal processing algorithms and a separate production line as well as separate characterization and QA.

Attached: 1.pngfa115c11-18e9-4952-8ca0-4027f1e187deOriginal.jpg (640x480, 28K)

So Apple actually once prioritized function over aesthetics? Unbelievable.

and probably 20x thinner, the most important metric

It'll go great with my world's fastest moped

Picture quality will still be below the P30 pro.

>flash isn't in the middle of the triple camera
Yeah, nah, this is some chink clone.

It looks cute, leave it alone.

I hope the pixels are even deeper this year

Attached: fixed.jpg (312x611, 35K)

basedesab
andna
redpilledellipder

>An iPhone with a sticker over the cameras
Good shit

did you have a stroke

Because then how else will they spy on you and everything around you?

Attached: 1555230627251.png (1266x926, 735K)

Basically this. Anyone who disagrees is a brainlet hating on something that's very well optimized for functioning instead of just looks.

fixed

Attached: 1560158927357.jpg (711x704, 59K)

The device needs to be 1mm thinner than last year's model, and if we negate the efficiency improvements with less battery capacity the goys will still have a reason to upgrade at the end of their two year contracts. Get good user.

The Pureview 808 would like to talk to you

dxomark.com/nokia-808-retested-new-dxomark-mobile-protocol/

LMAO

Attached: Chaillot_Nokia808PureView_DxOMark2015_05-00_slide17.jpg (3072x1728, 722K)

Yes?
So basically
>New cameras do a better job at low light
>808 stil holds up at regular lighting

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-06-11 at 2.10.59 am.png (1128x820, 1.23M)

That's a name I haven't heard in a long time.

Would be too niche. Not worth producing.

Diversity and inclusion.

Anyone who owns Apple products should be murdered. Prove me wrong.

I like the left

is this loss?

top kek it looks like a shitty chink knockoff

>Implying Apple would ever get rid of the status symbol logo

still takes much better photos

of course they did, but the design looks like shit, they deserve to get mocked for this and the notch, maybe the black one will look better irl

Attached: iPhone-XI-vs-iPhone-XI-Max-1-800x450.jpg (800x450, 22K)

FIXD mi frend

Attached: huwawe cant triforce.jpg (711x704, 73K)

>design/manufacturing cost is more than halved when both phone models use the same camera suite
doesn't matter since Apturd phones are overpriced to oblivion all the time.

heres the updated design thou

Attached: iPhone11.jpg (711x704, 161K)

Why can't they make the camera lenses look invisible? Maybe make the whole rear camera display area an OLED and have your main cameras hidden in display until it's time to take photos. That would be innovashun.

>Getting aroused by nudity
Animal tier
>Not having your own woman to arouse you
Incel tier

just buy one and unplug the camera

r8

Attached: iphone lel.png (321x634, 161K)

is such a thing possible?

Attached: cameras inside the apple.jpg (711x704, 141K)

Attached: iphonecamera.png (315x634, 208K)

Attached: MOAR.jpg (711x704, 101K)

Attached: Untitled-1.jpg (378x704, 42K)

>incels on the g board
ohh gee say it isn't so!
All to prepare us for the aliens that will be coming here soon.

How do I port forward

KEK

>implying applelfags value function over form

Nice. That will look perfectly well with my new MacBook Pro.

>no bloat means the phone rests on the camera glass when you put it down, leaving marks and scraches over time
>cracking the glass panel means cracking your camera glass as well
You're a retard, user.

Hahaha, very subtle.

other manufacturers can figure it out without making it look all retarded. this one has the cameras all centered so it's easier to aim.

youtube.com/watch?v=RXhxkQWD8T4

Looks like notch module is in the way and it makes it easier to connect to the motherboard without reducing battery space.

Attached: NVwTUohZkJOX1Hii.jpg (592x444, 36K)

Just design your phone better so the back glass can be easily replaced.
Also, it's tempered glass so it shouldn't scratch easily and doesn't. Very slight scratches will have no perceivable impact on the photos.

Jow Forumstards manage to scratch their phones, a lot of people here use screen protectors

B A S E D
A
S
E
D

>the races run by these slugs could be the fastest races run by a slug, ever
oh wow

just buy one and crack the camera

reminder the elder god tier photographer's setup is a really good smartphone camera that you bring everywhere and a >20k dslr for photo sessions.

if you are buying compact cameras or cheap dslrs you are doing it wrong

Since everyone copies apple we're about to hit the cambrian era of phone cameras. This should be interesting.

Attached: Opabinia_BW2.jpg (800x600, 102K)

>Jow Forums, the board with people so poor they convert chest freezers into fridges to try and spill less heat than a regular fridge
>buying a >20k dslr
there are actual pro photographers who have way less than 20k worth of gear
also mirrorless cameras are a thing although i personally think they're overhyped