3900X 0.38% slower than 9900k in gaming

wait then intel is fucked no? I remmeber ppl talking about csgo being optimizated for intel hardware

they cherry picked games that handle multi-threading well. I mean, seriously, Black Ops 3 lmao, that games is 3 years old.

Attached: wojinko smol braino.jpg (720x843, 73K)

Considering the hardware that the new consoles are going to be sporting, it's pretty safe to say that games in the future are going to very quickly be geared towards multi thread utilization.

They're fucked if they don't lower prices.

If single-core performance is the same, You'd have to be a special kind of retard to buy a 500$ 8-core over a 500$ 12-core.

this is what those who are currently shilling the 9400F don't understand.

Imagine how funny it would be to say PCMR when you have less cores and less performance on your PC.

such as CS:GO

Attached: 1int.png (303x311, 178K)

Exactly, game performance is going to be perfected on Zen 2 due to the architecture being the same on sony and MS's consoles. Not to mention the architecture being the same up and down their product stack, unlike intel.

Effectively AMD only has to do 1/10th the work to get the tuning intel has to work towards, at least until intels next arch comes out!

that frame rate implies 4k though, does it?

No 1080p. If AMD's claims about productivity performance holds up, there will be no reason to buy Intel.

Attached: COMPUTEX_KEYNOTE_DRAFT_FOR_PREBRIEF.26.05.19-page-035b.jpg (2053x1025, 220K)