Convince me not to switch my country over to this

Convince me not to switch my country over to this.

Attached: download (1).jpg (1041x568, 44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/05/5g-networks-will-likely-interfere-with-us-weather-satellites-navy-warns/
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html
monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono102.pdf
sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2016/05/06/no-increase-in-brain-cancer-from-mobile-phone-use-in-australia--.html
warosu.org/sci/thread/10708201#p10712026
warosu.org/sci/thread/10708724#p10712551
youtube.com/watch?v=fSoXIqBlg9M
quora.com/Why-does-Israel-not-use-5G-technology-even-though-it-was-developed-by-Israelis
reuters.com/article/israel-telecoms-5g/israel-eyes-5g-mobile-network-auction-by-mid-2019-idUSL8N1YW2C2
twitter.com/AnonBabble

NEW TEKNOLOJEE BAD

Attached: 1538448013398.jpg (689x714, 49K)

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/05/5g-networks-will-likely-interfere-with-us-weather-satellites-navy-warns/
No cancer risk though

Attached: Gen1_Speaker_Tower_Icons.png (64x51, 8K)

Anything that serves in depopulating this shitehole planet is good.

5g melts your bones

Potentially lethal but we'll see :^)

>5g is harmful

Attached: mmmeme.jpg (639x358, 52K)

...

Name 1 benefit to 5g other than speed. You're gonna have your sperm zapped just so you can download shit faster.

To everyone reading this, get a Faraday cock n ball cage, thank me later.

See

I don't trust the Chinks and neither should you.

>owns anything
>Made in China
>I don't trust the Chinks
Denial and projecting. Kek

ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html

government study into the health effects of radiofrequency radiation on rats

there are a lot of different sources claiming there are possible dangers. keep in mind wireless and internet industries are pushing hard for this, and may be blinded to the possibility it might hurt people.

imagine a tech that nukes your testosterone so you can download lewds faster.

Pathophysiology 16 (2009) 191–199
Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife
Alfonso Balmori

>This literature review shows that pulsed telephony microwave radiation can produce effects especially on nervous, cardiovascular, immune and reproductive systems[111]:
>- Damage to the nervous system by altering electroen-cephalogram, changes in neural response or changes of the blood–brain barrier.
>- Disruption of circadian rhythms (sleep–wake) by interfering with the pineal gland and hormonal imbalances.
>- Changes in heart rate and blood pressure.
>- Impairment of health and immunity towards pathogens,weakness, exhaustion, deterioration of plumage and growth problems.
>- Problems in building the nest or impaired fertility, number of eggs, embryonic development, hatching percentage and survival of chickens.
>- Genetic and developmental problems: problems of loco-motion, partial albinism and melanism or promotion of tumors.

>In the light of current knowledge there is enough evidence of serious effects from this technology to wildlife. For this reason precautionary measures should be developed, along-side environmental impact assessments prior to installation, and a ban on installation of phone masts in protected natural areas and in places where endangered species are present. Surveys should take place to objectively assess the severity of effects.

I like how this sort of shit always affects males...
Feminists must be loving this!

New tech is literally bad though, a wojak doesn't change that

its like the US is trying to sabotage itself... oh wait...

monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono102.pdf
large WHO study of the evidence concludes only limited relationship between cell phones and cancer but says that increased use does increase risk. if you assume that we use phones far more than might have previously been expected, then this might be a problem

Why do people get so defensive over smartphone radiation lmao.
>REEEEEEEE I USE MY PHONE 24/7 THERE'S NO HEALTH EFFECTS THERE'S NOT STOP IT
Back to fucking reddit, fags.

>muh NTP muh NTP!!!

>dosages tested ranged between 1W per Kg of bodyweight and 6W/Kg. So the very lowest dosage that they tested was the equivalent of an average-weight person being surrounded by approximately 200 cellphones transmitting at full power, 9 hours a day, 7 days a week.

>In all groups, survival rate was higher in the exposed rats than in the controls.

>Schwannomas (tumors) were found in 4 rats in the control group, or 4.4%. The numbers found in most of the various exposed groups were 1.1%, 2.2%, or 4.4%. There was one particular exposed group that did have 5.5%; 5 rats with schwannomas rather than 4 in the control group.

>The one group in which one more rat developed a schwannoma than the control was not the group exposed to highest dosages. There is no clear dose-dependant relationship between RF exposure and schwannoma development.

>study had an unusually low survival rate for their control rats. That alone could easily explain the marginally higher incidence of tumours in exposed groups - the control rats died before they had a chance to develop tumours.
sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2016/05/06/no-increase-in-brain-cancer-from-mobile-phone-use-in-australia--.html

>not to

what sort of flawed study is that where the control is worse off ?

Looks like the seething anti-5G tranny is back

Attached: 1560169723812.jpg (571x439, 112K)

Posting studies is pointless. All studies have flaws. /x/fags will immediately spot them, interpret them as deliberate and use them as arguments to become even more convinced of their opinion. Since this goes both ways and you will never be able to reach a consensus, the only winning move is not to play.

there's literally nothing wrong with being a tranny.
body modifications are cyberpunk as h*ck.

Attached: cyber.jpg (300x470, 34K)

i would rather have nightvision glassess and bionic arm for figthing and masturbation

Depopulation if americans is a good thing.

Shit, an actually non-schizo objection to 5G deployment. Ain't that something.

4k tranny porn stream right on your phone

It was a long term study and you were cherry picking.

Malignant glioma positive trend in exposed rats

Cardiac schwannomas observed in exposed, none in control

>Cardiac schwannomas observed in exposed, none in control
Keep repeating this lie, no one will believe it except you though

if it doesnt even heat water molecules how couldit affect cells that are made with millions of molecules?

5G is harmful. Thousands of studies over decades. Peer reviewed, etc.

Links to the archive, some good information.
Start of my own post chain.
warosu.org/sci/thread/10708201#p10712026
And an index in one post.
warosu.org/sci/thread/10708724#p10712551

The effect is nonthermal.

>some good information
You screaming bloody murder at le ebil trannies is not "good information"

Attached: 1560132728974.jpg (500x721, 214K)

>teehee

Attached: De_Alice's_Abenteuer_im_Wunderland_Carroll_pic_23_edited_1_of_2_2.png (2648x1647, 69K)

Just quoting their review

That would mean that it does nothing to humans. Passes through or bounces off without transferinf energy. EM waves. No reaction because there is no conductor in humans. Do animals sense EM fields? youtube.com/watch?v=fSoXIqBlg9M

And furthermore, anyone who's on the same page, obviously feel free to use any of this. The goal here is to spread the word.

I've answered questions of this sort as well. It's a matter of signal transduction and amplification, via a few routes but mostly an action on the voltage sensing subunit of calcium channels.

NTP was NTP. Honestly, it's just another one for the pile that happens to have a big name behind it so it'll make a slightly bigger splash. So there ya go, in the pile with the rest of the literally thousands of papers showing effects over the last hundred years. The problem isn't the availability of data, it never has been. It's regulatory blockade and many feet in many doors to the point where everyone has poured right in, and no one wants change.

Look at wireless. All of it. The whole military, telecom, consumer space, manufacturing, materials refinement, industrial complex. It's massive. A global network worth trillions upon trillions. In the case of South Korea, it comprises a decent chunk of their total economy. Something like that is not going to rationally respond to data. I go over the control structure and how we got here from the 20's to the present, as well. The 60's is where it really starts.

>banned in the country that invented it.
makes ya think dont it?

It should....

Attached: 1560027110649.png (581x525, 55K)

>That would mean that it does nothing to humans.
Why do you say that? The eye is evidence against this.

>the country that invented it.
Israel did not "invent" 5G
quora.com/Why-does-Israel-not-use-5G-technology-even-though-it-was-developed-by-Israelis
>banned
Not even close
reuters.com/article/israel-telecoms-5g/israel-eyes-5g-mobile-network-auction-by-mid-2019-idUSL8N1YW2C2

If no reaction nothing happens.
This calsium gate thing seems to be the only thing worth concern. How does it react when EM fields hit it?

The extracellular space is a narrow channel filled with a conductive fluid and with many negatively charged structures (membrane bound glycoproteins) extending out into it, trapped between very good resistors (the plasma membrane). The EMF/EMR propagates through this fluid and places forces on the charge groups making up the voltage sensor, activating. There are various other actions depending on frequency, but that's the major one.

Structures in biological systems are designed to resist random noise, and detect and selectively amplify periodic, polarized signals. They resemble coupled oscillators. The thermal vs athermal debates go all the way back to the early 1900's. The gist of it is whether the system is being heated, or detecting heating, or whether something else is happening. It's long been clear it's the latter. There were debates about microheating due to nonuniform energy deposition. This was also settled. Though actually it doesn't really matter why the effects happen and never has, since they clearly do. You don't need to know why you're bleeding out after you stab yourself to not stab yourself. Nonetheless, we now know why we've seen a lot of what we have for the last 100 years. Hooray.

Why, do it faggot! Switch, ruin your life because you are fucking imbecile anyway and do not deserve lo live

>retards worried about non-ionizing radiation

it boils your balls

Concise, substantial. Straight to the point.

I'll give it an 8/10.

>Arrogant and ignorant.
Haha

Attached: 1549858046821.png (500x712, 442K)

You anti-human fucks always say the same thing. If you really think humans are overpopulated then lead by example - kill yourself - so you don't poison this planet anymore.

This is actually a really good point. Rarely are they so honest as to bluntly say they want most everyone else dead. But surely, they are not part of the beast that is man, surely, they cannot be part of the problem. Surely... if all those others were just gone...

YOUR BODY MAY BE GONE, BUT I'M CARRY YOU ON IN MY HEAD, IN MY HEART, IN MY SOUL. AND MAYBE WE'LL GET LUCKY AND WE'LL BOTH LIVE AGAIN.

Well I don't know, I don't know, I don't think so.

There's no point to poison if it self destructs retard.

Why wouldn't you?

>Name 1 benefit to 5g other than speed.
>Name one benefit to speed improvement, and don't you dare say speed improvement
lmao

Basedboy detected.

Attached: Adey_LIDA.jpg (307x220, 11K)

Thanks

You're welcome.

Attached: Glaser1.jpg (2434x1964, 623K)

>faraday cock and ball cage
Oh fuck im lauffin