Vega 56/64 are b-better than the RX 5700/XT

>vega 56/64 are b-better than the RX 5700/XT
Are people still living in an imaginary land were they believe the Vega can beat the 2070?

Attached: 105019.png (678x400, 33K)

seriously? the 2080 can only do 1440p@90fps on GTA V, a glorified Xbox 360 game? what the fuck is happening with current gen GPUs

Progress is slowing down.

ARE THERE ANY REAL WORLD BENCHMARKS OUT YET?! DON'T GIVE ME FUCKING RELATIVE FPS! I WANT 99%s, 1%s and 0.1%s IN DEMANDING AAA TITLES, NOT SYNTHETIC BENCHMARKS!

rockstar optimizations

It's not far off, and in the UK you're choosing between a £250 Vega 56 with free shit or a £450 2070.

Attached: relative-performance_1920-1080.png (500x810, 132K)

>DON'T GIVE ME FUCKING RELATIVE FPS!
It's a bit annoying, but you could look for 2070 benchmarks in titles that AMD has given relative results in and infer from that the 5700/XT fps.

If it's faster than than the 2070 on average then it should match or nearly match the Radeon VII in performance with 20 less compute units.

Attached: untitled-28.png (686x960, 76K)

oops that's 1080p

Attached: untitled-29.png (690x978, 74K)

Yeah but that doesn't tell me anything about the quality of the card. It could run every single game on the planet at 500 fps at 8k but drop every 10 sec down to 5 fps. That would still be unplayable.

Fair point, user, and I think we need to wait until independent benchmarks are released before we draw any definite conclusions too, but I'm just speculating that the XT isn't a bad card like everyone is suggesting.

Attached: 105022.png (678x400, 33K)

people thought gta 5 was a good port. little did they know, it aged like shit and runs like trash still

>isn't bad
just doesn't cut it, i bought a 1440p/144hz screen and am looking for a matching GPU that does 60+ at ultra settings and i'd like to know if AMDs terrible lineup is forcing me to, yet again, go with Nvidia. i really don't want to be because i hate the company with all my heart but i don't want to waste 800 bucks on a card that doesn't do what i need just to stick to my morals. not worth it.

Stop hiring retarded pajeets to make your programs and game engines you fucking retarded shitters, hardware advancements have slowed down to a crawl and it's time for retards to optimize the game engines and programs to work better.

>what the fuck is happening with current gen GPUs
almost non existent progress for the dollar over the years
shitty console ports

gta 5 is unoptimized for higher end hardware, it's actually optimized reasonably well for mid and lower end

rockstar has intel's cock in its mouth and leatherjackman's in its ass.

I see you have aids and will post on Jow Forums till you die, nice?
You know RX 5700 is a new architecture and have less common with the Vega than you and your fathers DNS.

Whats there even talk about, its a year late and barely matches it for the same price with less capability. Its so typical AMD it hurts.

loooooooooool

Attached: heh.png (441x415, 35K)

>performs better than a card running at the same frequency with 1024 less SPs and not using 400 watts for the card alone

Attached: vega-56-mod-power-aotse_all.png (797x371, 60K)

>than you and your fathers DNS
what did he mean by this

Vega56 came out before RTX and it's only 250$ you RETARD.

>and it's only 250$ you RETARD.
for a meme blower

>GTA V
That game is notoriously bad on Vega although it has improved with driver updates. In new titles a properly OC'd and undervolted Vega 56 sits between a RTX 2060 and RTX 2070 closer to the 2070 and sometimes beating it. That being said said RX 5700 XT is FASTER than the 2070 on some of Vega's worst games. Not only that it also uses FAR less power. Vega being a compute oriented card rebadged for gaming has major issues utilizing its power in games not properly optimized for it.
Rockstar games are NOT known for well optimized PC ports.

Attached: 1471396486391.png (578x691, 182K)

My Vega 56 flashed with a 64 bios with OC'd HBM @ 1050mhz and undervolted to 975mv pulls around 220 watts in Unigine Valley. If you know what you are doing you can get power daw down and performance up drastically.
I have the blower card and undervolted/OC'd it isn't any louder than my old Asus STRIX GTX 970. If anything its quieter.

Attached: 1481915065259.jpg (932x576, 52K)

What game is actually a good benchmark?

>only one game
kek, keep coping kike
Vega can beat rtx and navi can beat both

Attached: oh no no no.png (867x344, 30K)

Im sorry you bought and amd blower housefire

Blower isn't loud unless you make it do something it wasn't designed to do. I will say while it isn't louder than a big double fan or triple fan downdraft cooler it is a higher pitch noise. I play games with headphones on so i don't really notice. The AC is louder.

Attached: 1471400336216.png (1200x1000, 613K)

>and amd
wot did he meme by this

GTA ports have always been shit.

Spelling mistake, he mean DNA

I mean I managed to get minecraft to run at 30fps.

Attached: Minecraft 1.12.2 2019-05-10 2_26_19 PM.jpg (2560x1440, 900K)

and that was before I even added textures

Attached: Minecraft 1.12.2 2019-05-10 3_05_55 PM.jpg (2560x1377, 677K)

cope

are you stupid? I've literally owned both downdraft and blower coolers. Unless you are trying to push OCs the blower is plenty quiet.