template
or
template
Template<class T>
Jaxson Roberts
Joseph Parker
yes
Gabriel Hall
Thank you
Liam Adams
I prefer typename even though it's longer because it's more consistent.
Brandon Nguyen
They are not the same thing
Xavier Myers
yes they are
Jaxon Hernandez
"typename" is correct. Use of "class" in that context is only available for backwards compatibility.
Ian Rogers
How about
Template
?
Hudson Cruz
The absolute state of static typing.
Josiah Hall
in haskell this is just
Dylan Green
both
typename when simple types are acceptable
class when the parameter should be a class
Gavin Ramirez
nope
you may write e.g.
template
Ayden Wood
None, stop being a faggot and don't use templates.
Chase Nelson
why?
genuine question i never understood the hatred for templates.
>huurrr they generate a function for every single type
no they obviously dont, they just generate for the ones that are calling it
Jason Morgan
It's pure bloat and makes reading C++ code even more confusing than it already is.
Andrew Gomez
template code is a hell of a lot easier to read than macro code
Grayson Jackson
If you want readability go program python.
>“C++ is designed to allow you to express ideas, but if you don't have ideas or don't have any clue about how to express them, C++ doesn't offer much help.”
Asher Hernandez
This is fucking dumb, specifically because it's not enforced.
If you want to do this. Wait until concepts.
Sebastian Williams
>C++ code even more confusing than it already is.
Look at this fucking brainlet
Eli White
Class for when you know the exact class, typename for when you need to somehow determine it.
Ryan Mitchell
>"There are only two things wrong with C++: The initial concept and the implementation."
Kevin Rogers
Obviously C++ isn't for you, stick to C