THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING

I THOUGHT 9900K WAS THE BEST CPU FOR GAMING IN THE UNIVERSE

Attached: 1560205042111.jpg (2017x1110, 245K)

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/229189
amazon.ca/Best-Sellers-Electronics-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/1233052011
amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Computers-Accessories-Processors/zgbs/computers/430515031
amazon.com.au/gp/bestsellers/computers/4913338051
amazon.de/gp/bestsellers/computers/430177031
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>intel wins in 4 games
>amd wins in 3 games
Looks like it truly is the best

And then you apply the security patches...

>Oh and AMD also said that they ran all of their Intel system tests that they shared today without software and firmware mitigations in place for these security flaws, which gives Intel a much better shot at 'Best-Case Scenario' performance.

Attached: 1542027477262.png (807x745, 205K)

>unreleased cpu on a new node with no game optimizations beats intel in 3 games

shush goy

My 8400 will beat the shit out of 3600 in every game

Attached: hehehe.gif (317x286, 271K)

...

>unreleased cpu on a new node with no game optimizations beats intel in 3 games that are specifically optimised for intel without win10 patch that fixes zen crippling and without applying mitigation patches
ftfy

THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING. ANOTHER ONE OF THESE SHIT THREADS

Even an fx is better than the 8400 after patches. But keep coping intcel.

cringe and copepilled

Attached: nK3PpNtb.jpg (827x1087, 108K)

It still is, AYYMD needs magical 5000MHz+ RAM, can't do 5GHz and still hasn't caught up in IPC

>intel needs a chiller
INTLUL

>If I shout it out loud enough and often enough, surely I can fool some goys into buying an i9 and fill my quota before 7/7!

intel needs to turn their cpu into pozzed swiss cheese for it to compete with amd, what point are you trying to convey

>better for dmc5
>better for civ 6
>better for overwatch
>better for rocket league
Those are the only games that matter. Everything else is zoomer trash. 9900k is literally better by every valid metric

>loses in csgo and pubg
These are the most popular games on steam, any other game is irrelevant

Attached: 1536694146733.png (1200x800, 164K)

>cope

the absolute state of poozens

You really love the word poo don't you?

>implying anything in that slide not zoomer trash
kys intard

amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Electronics-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/229189

amazon.ca/Best-Sellers-Electronics-CPU-Processors/zgbs/electronics/1233052011

amazon.co.uk/Best-Sellers-Computers-Accessories-Processors/zgbs/computers/430515031

amazon.com.au/gp/bestsellers/computers/4913338051

amazon.de/gp/bestsellers/computers/430177031

Attached: 1560227473323.jpg (725x350, 107K)

have amd intcels

Attached: transgender_girlfriend.jpg (609x1200, 82K)

>MUH FIVE THOUSAND NIGGERHURTZ

None of these games is CPU intensive.
Post simulators benchmarks or GTFO.

And then you run them on the May Windows update and get 6-15% more performance on top of these results.

Attached: ryzen_3000_windows_optimizations-100798898-large.jpg (1200x661, 65K)

Based and estrogenpilled

DELID DIS YOU STUPID GOY

Rekt

Since first gen three rippers are $180 and $250 should I upgrade from a first gen ryzen 3 or no for Gayman?

On the upside at least we have real competition which should mean much better CPUs and chipsets from both sides for the next few generations.

Hopefully better pricing too (this would likely be too much to ask, etc).

>$500 for 1080p

Attached: pepe2.jpg (499x481, 28K)

based

>girlfriend
DON'T TAINT 2D REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>Arguing over single digit performance differences
These things will be so closely matched that memory speeds and silicon lottery will decided who gets the fastest chip.

>overwatch
>rocket league
>not zoomer trash

>>>better for overwatch
>>better for rocket league
These are zoomer games, right?

Yeah 1% better in rocket league LOL

I'm on an i7 2600k so I'm sure I'll pick up a cheap threadripper.

my 9600k at 5ghz will beat every AMD processor in gaming at 1440p. Mark my words.

Your buyer's remorse is showing.

Assuming you have the means is there much point in going above 5.5ghz?

Bigger e-dick.

and the heat sink to maintain it on proper temp
and then you have to buy a proper power supply so it doesn't blow
and then you have to pass new cables though the wall because they will be burnt out

Checked and based

>cope related

Attached: Intel vs AMD FX.png (408x1266, 101K)

>shitel
There's your problem.

6ghz 9900k extreme cope edition

Would breed

>FX better than 8400
Holy shit how the mighty have fallen

fuckin this
I was told at computex that AMD was basically raping Intel on every front
now we see actual benchmarks (by AMD itself btw) and it's more of a tie.
Once this gets released and we get/make real-world benchmarks thing could look even worse for AMD. Wtf?
>inb4 shill
-Posted from a Ryzen/Radeon PC

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 920K)