Hello, I'm here to install the 5G internet

Hello, I'm here to install the 5G internet.

Attached: s-l300.jpg (158x300, 10K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=W0qSNvIlG9Q
youtube.com/watch?v=XyrdQE503Sc
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html
youtube.com/watch?v=bsaB7ewFsN0
monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono102.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Have sex

dilate

*unzips hazmat suit*

3.6 roentgen around the 5G transmitter? Not great, not terrible.

>what is the inverse square law

oh is that the law that says there's no radiation from 5g?
I don't think so cuntboy, so shut the fuck up and don't open your mouth on topics you have no understanding of.

Attached: 1558144620236.png (292x282, 80K)

>he thinks some government bureaucrat writing laws will stop 5G radioactivity

Even up close, the radiation would not be harmful. They don't wear suits to protect against ionizing radiation (since it isn't). Also, if the tower was being built there would be nothing emitted since it can't be turned on.
OP is a faggot, of course.

>"Bouncer bouncer!"

Attached: Overwatch_Soldier_mp7.jpg (276x500, 19K)

Based and waterpilled

>more schizo threads

Why do you Russians have so much AIDS? Why are Russians going through an obesity epidemic?

Why do Russians kill themselves more than trannies? Why do Russians look at Futa porn so much?

When you kill yourself do you think your mom will care?

Attached: IMG_20190613_131734.png (500x537, 305K)

5G

The connection speed is 3.6 Megabits, not great, not terrible

>so shut the fuck up and don't open your mouth on topics you have no understanding of.
The irony

Are you retarded?

>Radiation from cell towers is the same radiation you get from Chernobyl
Jow Forums, just stick to about intel vs AMD because you're now buying into a conspiracy theory that's been created by people who barely even finished school.

Attached: 1468878588987.png (720x1280, 635K)

gamma radiation is photons, same as cell phone transmissions

Radio waves are electromagnetic waves that are non-ionizing, it does produce heat but cellphone towers don't radiate enough waves in high enough concentrations to provide a noticeable increase in body temperature.

Gamma radiation is ionizing, so it reduces the molecular count in our cells and therefore damages them directly.

Redpill me on 5G

will sterilize you and give you cancer. tinnitus and headaches so bad you cant sleep. nosebleeds for kids.

youtube.com/watch?v=W0qSNvIlG9Q

>shut the fuck up and don't open your mouth on topics you have no understanding of.
Yet we still have these 5G threads

There's no study to show harmful effects from 5G

It uses exactly the same technology as radios have used for nearly a century now, it just has a higher data throughput because it uses much higher frequencies. The trouble with higher frequencies is that they typically have shorter ranges and physical obstacles are much more effective at blocking the signal. It seems 5G gets around this by having many small cell towers in close proximity to create a metropolitan area network instead of using a huge tower that broadcasts over a wide area.

Basically, the technology isn't new and the higher frequencies mean that actually the radio waves probably can't even penetrate the body any more.

>t. vaguely educated guess.

>this thread

completely incorrect, the 30 million dollar NTP study was on the much less harmful 2G and 3G signals and found they caused exotic heart and brain cancers

youtube.com/watch?v=XyrdQE503Sc

Attached: 52.png (1415x786, 540K)

another aspect you're missing is the method of modulation of the signals used to push more data out. 4G LTE signals are especially toxic to biology, and LTE is what 5G will be based upon.

Attached: 134.png (995x1403, 920K)

>citing youtube

>citing Dr. Ronald Melnick who led the design of the NIH study
pathetic damage control, 5G tranny shill

Go ahead and link to a study where they studied 5G and found it causes issues in humans.

there are none because 5G modulation is not even finalized yet

the NTP study is sufficient for us to understand 5G is very toxic to all biological life

cite the paper directly or I don't care

ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html

read away

>but cellphone towers don't radiate enough
Unless its 5G tower...

thank you, I will

>there are none
Imagine my surprise

>dude 5G is completely sa-

youtube.com/watch?v=bsaB7ewFsN0

Attached: dsa.jpg (1370x726, 124K)

>Capital letters
>Scientists haven't been able to study it!
>Corporations are forcing it because they're brutes
>It's radiation*
>"It's common sense bro"
This image seems like "chem trails" levels of woke science.. if a single radio wave has no discernible effect on the body then why would loads of radio waves be any different?

Show the actual citations retard

No, because it's still relatively low power and is designed to scatter radio waves over a wide area. Not high power and focused to a single line of sight.

Link to a study where they studied 5G and found it causes issues in humans.

you're not even trying to argue at this point, just flapping your hands around autistically hoping nobody will notice the hard science

wi-cancer.info
knock yourself out, citations at the bottom of each page

the NTP study shows that much less toxic 2G and 3G signals cause malignant heart and brain tumors in the rats that are used as analogues for humans

the more you try to ignore this post the more obvious your agenda becomes, telecoms tranny

So it talks about 5G and says it's harmful to humans?

But I've already said that radio has had nearly a century of use and we haven't all died of cancer, and I've also said that 5G is operating at much higher frequencies and therefore is less likely to penetrate deep inside the body.

This is stuff I learned at school and later at university, not at an obviously biased website "wi-cancer.info" whose only purpose is to spread a conspiracy theory through the power of charts.

>Scientists have had neither time nor money to investigate...
Why though? If 4g and 5g are so much worse it should be a lot easier to investigate.
>5G is very toxic to all biological life
How exactly?

sorry but at this juncture you've conceded the point

read the image I posted about the modulation of the signal.
>a conspiracy theory
nevermind you're telecoms tranny's best bud

>How exactly?
modulation to the point of distortion, "densification" of signals, the collimation of said signals with new antennae designs, blanket coverage with hundreds of transmitters per street etc etc

I don't really care about the modulation of the signal because I know that's irrelevant, because radio waves themselves are not harmful.

>sorry but at this juncture you've conceded the point
Do you have such a study or not?
Can you provide a study where they found out 5G to be "very toxic to all biological life"?

>much higher frequencies and therefore is less likely to penetrate deep inside the body.
Wrong

>i am ignorant and that's just the way i like it

look at this thread. you lost.

Attached: 6445.jpg (399x386, 30K)

But again, this is all going on the basis that the signals themselves are harmful.

>look at this thread
Please provide the study, if you have one.

Okay. I'm not.

>I just spout out a load of buzzwords and think I'm woke
Okay m80.

The only thing I want to know is who benefits financially or geopolitically from delay in 5G implementation, since it's obvious that this shitstorm of forced troll-meme pseudoscience about the 5G armageddon is coming mostly from a paid corporate or government source.

read the NTP study

@71402374
yikes

>science is buzzwords

please state your level of knowledge. Ignorant have no idea. Option is not in their brain. Dunning-Kruger effect. Like someone who doesnt know that there is more white people outside of the usa.

very high

Maybe it's because there isn't a single American company that's been able to produce 5G infrastructure since Intel abandoned their efforts. The current market leaders in 5G is the Chinese with Huawei and ZTE.

So anyone who has a vested interest in scuttling China's domination of 5G as part of an ongoing trade war..

>densification" of signals, the collimation of said signals with new antennae designs, blanket coverage with hundreds of transmitters per street etc etc
You basically just said "there's more signals innit?" three times, without actually explaining why you believe that's harmful for your health.

And he can't provide a single study where they studied 5G and proved it to be harmful to humans. This is some weak shit.

sorry but you need to do some research on this topic. Dr Martin Pall is your first stop

the NTP study shows much less powerful than 5G signals caused exotic heart and brain cancers

>the NTP study shows much less powerful than 5G signals caused exotic heart and brain cancers
And what did it say about 5G and its effect on humans?

the NTP study shows much less powerful than 5G signals caused exotic heart and brain cancers

the precautionary principle will apply one way or the other

There's various evidence of possible health risks from non-ionizing radiation, like 5g.

monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono102.pdf

>1 Cancer in humans There is limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of radiofrequency radiation. Positive associations have been observed between exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wire-less phones and glioma, and acoustic neuroma.6.

2 Cancer in experimental animals There is limited evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of radiofrequency radiation.6.

3 Overall evaluation Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B)

It's a case of there being a real possibility of risk, but at this time no very proven risk. If you look at the evidence though it does look like the exposure in some studies is much less than what normal exposure is these days. I guess at the end of the day it's a case of being willing or not to take the risk for the benefit it could bring.

You are dodging the question. What did they say about 5G and its effect on humans? Please answer the question.

>sorry but you need to do some research on this topic
No, because you're failing to make the case to me that this really needs more research. You also talk like a mong as well, "exotic heart and brain cancers"? What the fuck does that even mean? Is it opposed to the indigenous cancer cells you sometimes find in a perfectly healthy heart of brain?

if visible ligh directly to your brain doesnt do shit why would lower level EM wave do something.
If it does do something how fast do you expect we will see the effects?
5G is 3 things higher 4G, middle, mmWaves 100meter radius like light but unseeable by human eyes.

the NTP study shows much less powerful than 5G signals (old 2G and 3G modulation methods) caused exotic heart and brain cancers

you're an actual retard pal, sorry

why do microwaves cook meat from the inside out

Why don't you answer the question? It's a simple one.
1. What did they say about 5G
2. What did they say about its (5G) effects on humans.

Nah come on admit it user, you said "exotic" to make this "5G cancer" sound even more zany. That's the sign of someone seeking attention and not scientific truth.

Why can't phone corps get insurance on their transmitters if they're so safe?

Do the insurers know something the public doesn't (yet)?

"exotic" in that context is a medical term

Attached: Vodafone.png (900x520, 229K)

>Phone towers are the same a microwave ovens
>Calling anyone else a retard

Attached: 1280-525172763-woman-pointing-and-laughing[1].jpg (1280x1280, 162K)

Makes sense. It also seems rather obvious that the big telcom companies have been extremely slow to invest in fiber (the only thing that would dramatically increase bandwidth everywhere it goes) which is pretty typical of monopoly/oligopoly behavior. Something similar has happened with big pharma in recent years, where they have reduced R & D spending at the same time raising prices on existing drugs still under patent. CFOs use the euphemism "value enhancement" for the practice.

>microwaves have no effect on living cells despite cells using voltage in all vital processes

Attached: 1536991931274.png (625x682, 125K)

Yeah, exotic generally meaning something out of the ordinary, like all cancers by definition. There's no need to call any form of cancer "exotic" because they all are.

Why are you trying to dodge the question?

just got home, link seems to be broken

Answer my question:

Why can't phone corps get insurance on their transmitters if they're so safe?

Do the insurers know something the public doesn't (yet)?

Attached: T Mobile.png (922x534, 243K)

Shoo shoo schizo, back to and with the other retards.

>And then I saw it. The dread device. The 5G tower. It stood there, alone, on the dessicated street. Baleful energies zipped and crackled across it's surface. Sporadic blinding flashes burnt spiderwebs onto my retinas as the thrumming energies arced from the tower, striking nearby car chassis, drain covers and other metallic objects. For me of course, it was too late. The skin started to slough from my doubled over frame, and hissing smoke vented from every pore. With a last gasp, I collapse into a puddle of pink flesh and bone, the 5G energy overcoming me.

I think you replied to the wrong person, homeboy. I want to hear about the 5G study.

I've already answered your question with the NTP study, now address my question while you're still logging hours:

Why can't phone corps get insurance on their transmitters if they're so safe?

Do the insurers know something the public doesn't (yet)?

Attached: America Movil.png (902x537, 225K)

Because it hasn't been scientifically proven that transmitters cause any negative health effects, when something isn't scientifically proven there's no way to test whether was the causation of some kind of ailment was due to radio transmitters.

If they did insure for damaged health due to transmitters with no proven way to test for it, it would open people up to making all sorts of bogus claims on their insurance. "Radio transmitters gave me depression and it's so chronic I can't work ever again"

please go see how microwaves cook food.
high energy, 5g is not and is on different frequency plane.