wccftech.com
>AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Benchmarked in Geekbench, $1250 US Cheaper Than Intel’s Flagship Core i9-9980XE With 18 Cores Yet Obliterates It In Single & Multi-Threaded Workloads
HOLY FUCK LMAO
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Benchmarked in Geekbench...
Ian Mitchell
Other urls found in this thread:
browser.geekbench.com
browser.geekbench.com
twitter.com
Owen Campbell
Yet still slower on all the apps and games that matter. Stay seething AMDrone.
Jeremiah Gonzalez
JUST
Brayden Clark
>muh games
Chase Cox
This is no surprise. AMD has the upper hand architecturally, so they'll be leading desktop sales for probably the next year
Intel has gotten out 10nm for laptops, which is where they care about the most.
Jaxon Green
Let's go over the facts, shall we:
Intel
>some vulnerabilities found, but ALL of them have since been patched
>Intel ME has been locked down, audited by security experts, and is no longer a security risk
>patches have NEGLIGIBLE impact on gaming
>storage IO takes a slight hit
>much higher clocks (better for older games)
>much lower core and cache latencies (very important for gaming)
>more industry-adopted instruction sets, better optimization in Unreal Engine, Unity, Frostbite, etc.
>uses less power-per-clock and has better frequency-to-voltage characteristics (why Intel will always hit 5.0GHz and AMD will never be able to)
AMD
>Ryzenfall and 12 other vulnerabilities STILL NOT COMPLETELY FIXED
>PSP has been fully compromised and gives attackers complete access to all parts of an AMD CPU; AMD REFUSES TO DISABLE PSP ON ANY RYZEN CPU
>has performance loss with its already lower IPC (turning a shit hatchback into a shittier hatchback)
>literally slower NVMe throughput by default because AMD can't into IO queuing optimizations
>lower clocks than Intel's First Gen Core architecture
>almost twice or three times the latency depending on which cores are accessing which cache; made even worse with multi-die Ryzens (like all of the Ryzen 3000s)
>literally no one optimizes for AMD's instruction sets; locked out of the instruction sets the games industry uses
>uses far more power per watt because Infinity Fabric eats power the higher you clock it (guess what was exponentially increased on Ryzen 3000...)
Other notes - PCIe Gen 4 literally doesn't matter
>storage IO loss literally doesn't matter for gaming because 99.99% of games doesn't come close to using a tenth of an NVMe drive's IO throughput
>4K 144hz gaming doesn't even saturate PCIe 3.0 x8
Jacob King
You forgot the best detail
>at 105W
Sebastian Anderson
>Intel
>uses less power-per-clock
Have a (You)
Jose Williams
>*tips menora*
Andrew Hughes
You forgot the even bester detail.
>They ran this test on an early sample that only hit 4.3GHz.
This thing is going to reach 6400 in SC once it actually hits 4.7GHz