Do freetards have a genuine form of autism...

and most people choose to accept what they have (Windows 7 etc.) instead of learning a new system entirely

Does what's in the EULA even apply to most users?

Until the product gets so bad they have to leave it.
Such as Windows ME and Vista.
10 got force installed.

look at this man

Attached: Linuxtattoo.jpg (465x349, 126K)

Yeah, I can't buy a non-professional license of Microsoft Office and use it at work, for example. Freedom 0 is probably the most violated right.

Attached: microsoft-tattoo.jpg (500x375, 89K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal

But I heart dat closed software were gilty in leaking confidencial datas of users

Attached: jamesdeleontrudtattoo-640x699.jpg (640x699, 85K)

They're just protecting their rights, nobody has the right to steal user.

For example software researchers tend to be convinced that Discort application is stealing stand of users active processes

Attached: Arch_Linux_pedo.png (800x984, 430K)

Read the actual thing.

They were only trying to protect music from being stolen from them. Sony did nothing wrong.

it's important that both copyright and copyleft software systems and licensing exist at the same time to keep each other in check.

It is not the correct answer to eliminate one and only use the other.

man, entering all of these manually makes me feel like my system is powerful

Attached: Wpa_supp.gif (398x599, 55K)

a trio of men who take it in the ass

Read the actual thing.

sick utnudu tatoo

I see no wrongdoing by sony

>b-b-b-but they used free software illegally
That's what you deserve for being cucks in the first place :^)
Based sony, gonna run off and buy some more bluerays now.

So you're OK with someone installing malware on your devices and taking over your computer in order to protect their rights, restricting the possible ways to actually listen to the album you purchased?

>still thinks linux distros still work as they did in the 00's

Attached: 1420031461118.jpg (795x1192, 303K)

Attached: Linux_nutshell.jpg (960x640, 59K)

>So you're OK with someone installing malware
Malware was unintentionally, and they fixed it with an update.

>taking over your computer
Please, they only installed DRM software to prevent you from ripping.

>in order to protect their rights, restricting the possible ways to actually listen to the album you purchased?
Absolutely, pirates BTFO'd

Attached: LinuxUserl.jpg (294x278, 13K)

Read the actual thing.

Attached: Linuxaudio.png (1209x815, 21K)

microsoft.com/en-us/pride

Attached: Microsoft Dev.png (1066x599, 781K)

>updated 2007

What's the matter, freecuck? Can't accept the fact that I came to a different conclusion than you? kek

Attached: Netbsd.jpg (711x598, 95K)

>weev

Attached: jew.jpg (492x725, 113K)

>it runs on Linux

A CHALLENGER APPROACHES

Attached: NaziBSD.jpg (400x535, 60K)

Please don't call Linux people Freetards. That's different communities.

Read this thing instead:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootkit

Sony have the right to install software on your computer to prevent you from stealing from them.

$sys$your_mom_sucking_dick_in_hell.wmv

>a kernel

>attempting to boycott, sabotage, or insult companies that go against these practices
nice bait

Seething freecuck

captainpackrat.com/furry/furcode.htm
unrelated to copyright vs copyleft in software
but what the Hell did I just unearth here

Attached: IMG_20190604_110445.jpg (250x250, 18K)

>yes, what the OS is built around

If you use a sony disk, that file would be invisible to everything, including anti viruses, because it literally replaces the windows disk driver with a rootkit that is literally a virus.
And installing viruses on computers is literally against the law.
It's a crime called Unauthorized access.
So no, sony don't have the right to install a virus to your computer without your consent.

This code format is quite dumb because it limits the animal species by design and can't support something such as a digimon.

Do wincucks have a genuine form of retardation? Most people when looking for products only care about whether it's good for their own person but will be happy enough to engage in mutually beneficial trade. But Micro$hit-shills and similar groups insist on being apologists for obviously immoral practices, to other people treating it like it's a moral obligation for corporations to cheat end users out of all their rights, while continuing to boycott, sabotage, or insult simple human beings that go against these practices.
The 'average' user clicks on the clicky buttons and oggles at YouTube videos. They can do it on pretty much any modern OS their hardware will support.

It wasn’t a virus. Read your own link retard.

Rootkit is literally a virus designed to hide files from the operating system and antivirus software.
And several viruses took advantage of the sony rootkit.
Sony broke the law.

>freecuck
are you supposed to be offended by these insults?

Yea. Pro-life loonies are way worse than those who care deeply about their freedoms. Dont generalize. You see what you expect ignoring the full picture. This is not the case for all groups like pro-lifers who are the epitome of their stereotypes.

kys faggot.

Attached: bait.jpg (550x633, 34K)

I actually kind of like this one

The purpose of a root kit is to gain “root” privileges you moron. Not “hiding files”. Seriously, zoomed need to leave and educate themselves.

>losing a lawsuit = breaking the law
Grow up

Why would they be proponents of inferior shit where people are stuck with bugs, poor decisions (hurr durr we change everything to a tablet UI and add ads all over the place while asking for a 3x as expensive "cloud subscription" as the only payment model)? THAT would make no sense. Of course open source is much better and worth pointing out.

Imagine any other industrial machines being locked into one proprietary usage with no option to repair them, set them up differently, or use them outside of that one licensed context. That's insane and it'd suck. You'll never be able to adapt to any situation at all.

Why should sony, or any third party, be allowed root on my private computer, which is my private property?
>>losing a lawsuit = breaking the law
Actually yes, that is true. They lost the lawsuit and were found to be breaking the law.

And this shows EXACTLY that you fucking didn't even read the article like i told you several times.

But lemme feed you:
"n 2005, Sony BMG published CDs with copy protection and digital rights management software called Extended Copy Protection, created by software company First 4 Internet. The software included a music player but silently installed a rootkit which limited the user's ability to access the CD.[11] Software engineer Mark Russinovich, who created the rootkit detection tool RootkitRevealer, discovered the rootkit on one of his computers.[1] The ensuing scandal raised the public's awareness of rootkits.[12] To cloak itself, the rootkit hid from the user any file starting with "$sys$". Soon after Russinovich's report, malware appeared which took advantage of that vulnerability of affected systems.[1] One BBC analyst called it a "public relations nightmare."[13] Sony BMG released patches to uninstall the rootkit, but it exposed users to an even more serious vulnerability.[14] The company eventually recalled the CDs. In the United States, a class-action lawsuit was brought against Sony BMG.[15]"
This is fucking illegal.

>Why should sony, or any third party, be allowed root on my private computer, which is my private property?
It's not your private property, is it. Why should you be allowed to just steal their copyrighted music, which they paid artists for?

>They lost the lawsuit and were found to be breaking the law.
Actually, they reached a settlement in all cases. Also, that's not what lawsuits means. If you break the law, you go to criminal court. If you have a legal dispute, you have lawsuits. Fucking kids need to grow up.

See Nobody ever concluded that they violated the law, because it never went to court. Zoomers need to learn grownup stuff before pretending to know shit.

>everyone in the thread saying zoomer

Attached: doom_4.jpg (1739x1275, 533K)

Okay, i will shoot you and hide the body so well the police will not find it, and according to you, i will not violate the law because this will never reach the court.

>Underaged zoomer doesn't know what case law is
Murder is breaking the law, that has been tried in (criminal) court MANY times. Seriously, you need to go back to high school and learn these things.

A settlement just means that the resolution was not disclosed. There can still be law breaking that occurred.

>Why should you be allowed to just steal their copyrighted music, which they paid artists for?
Copying isn't stealing, it's copying. I am a musician who makes money from album sales and I fully acknowledge this, what's your excuse for continuing to push this deception?

>putting cd on the computer turns you into a property stealing illegal computer pirate
How do I play this CD I purchased on my Creative Muvo Tx?

Attached: Creative_muvo_TX_FM_512mb.jpg (1600x1067, 252K)

>There can still be law breaking that occurred.
There may and may not be a violation of law, but innocence is presumed.

>Copying isn't stealing, it's copying.
The law, which you go on and on about, in this case, copyright law, disagree with you.

>I am a musician who makes money from album sales and I fully acknowledge this
It doesn't matter what YOU think, what matters is copyright law.... You know, this law you keep screaming about.

No software on the planet does something so unique, so powerful, that it just has to remain hidden.

laws are not absolute would you obey a sign?

You could copy my music right now and I would not be able to sue you. In fact I encourage you to copy it because every time you do it increases my album sales. This is fully allowed within copyright law.

>In fact I encourage you to copy it because every time you do it increases my album sales
Yeah, and every time people make GPL software, they earn billions of dollar and become instantly rich, right?

If they sold a lot of copies yes. Take a look at Red Hat, it's a pretty big company and the founders have gotten very rich.

>I guess all those Catholics screaming murder in front of abortion clinics are autistic
Actually, yes. You're exactly right.

so communism cooperating with capitalism?

remove the surplus hair and it's your uncle that spends all day drinking beers all alone

Attached: boomertranny.jpg (1440x2112, 97K)

They're not rich from selling copies, moron. They're making most of their money from cloud services. Also, 500 million operating income is not "very" rich at all.

>that has been tried in (criminal) court MANY times
So is Unauthorized access.
There are many people in jail for getting in computers without the authorization of the owner and modifying system files.

No, free software is capitalism. Nonfree software is communists who do not believe in free market.

No shit they aren't as rich as bigger companies such as Microsoft because that company is literal convicted monopolists, aka criminals. Of course they can make more money by scamming and doing illegal acts, that doesn't mean we should allow them to.

youtube.com/watch?v=SYRlTISvjww

Communism is a system where there's no central government and people live in small communes with shared resources.
Socialism is a system where the means of production are seized by the government and it is the only corporation that exist.
Open source is neither.

No fun allowed. Serious business only.

>So is Unauthorized access.
Prove that it was unauthorized access.... Oh wait, you can't, because it didn't go to civil court.

You're ignoring the first part of my post, namely that their revenue is mostly from cloud.

Freetards being disingenuous with their "hurr durr you can sell GPL copies" argument that no one believes in.

Prove it's murder, Oh wait, you can't because it didn't go to the court because the police never found out you was murdered.

Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, IBM, etc also get most of their revenue from cloud in this, the current year.

You could sell GPL licenses if you wanted. It's possible that no one would buy them, but that's a separate issue which is that your product offering is bad.

only court can prove?
GPL gets funding if useful. GPL can sell service or their product to those who want convinience or something else.
Big companies or copycats decide to abuse this and you are the tard here sucking corporate dick unwittingly.

Same degeneracy of capitalism. Open source is the first fragment of post capitalism. (screencap this for the generations to come)

can tell if you're joking or not, but what happens in post capitalism?

>who care deeply about their freedoms.
Freedom of what? There is no freedom in a cage (our society).

you probably think of society as a cage because you don't take initiative to improve your circumstance

Kek I liked this one

In that case you don't go to jail, yes. But that's not the same as saying that murder isn't illegal. 1) You need to distinguish between criminal law and civil law, and 2) you need to understand what constitutes case law.

>Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, IBM, etc also get most of their revenue from cloud in this, the current year.
Yeah, but in the past they have earned money from selling proprietary software.

>have a genuine form of autism
>attempting to boycott, sabotage, or insult
No mirrors in your house? No problem, just turn off your monitor.

Post scarcity. End of production based on exchange value.
Nobody escape the cage.

Altering system files of a computer without authorization for nefarious purposes is literally a crime., its not "civil law".
cga.ct.gov/2012/rpt/2012-R-0254.htm
>2. intentionally or recklessly and without authorization (a) tampering with, damaging, or taking data intended for use by a computer system or (b) intercepting or adding to data residing within a computer system;