Do freetards have a genuine form of autism? Most people when looking for software only care about whether it's effective in its job. But Linoox and similar groups insist on the source code for the program be open to other people treating it like it's a moral obligation while also attempting to boycott, sabotage, or insult companies that go against these practices. PC is much more convenient for the average user, anyway.
Do freetards have a genuine form of autism...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
microsoft.com
en.wikipedia.org
captainpackrat.com
youtube.com
cga.ct.gov
twitter.com
>caring deeply about something you perceive as immoral is autism
I guess all those Catholics screaming murder in front of abortion clinics are autistic, then.
companies like Microsoft are simply protecting their work from being stolen
yes, Copyrighted software is totally comparable to abortion
This but unironically.
The trick is that the open source software direction is controlled by the public.
If windows decides to go an horrible direction, you're dragged along for the ride with no choice.
The nazis protected their land from being stolen by jews and other inferior races too.
This, but unironically.
Copyrights are fine, user. The GPL is in fact a copyright. DRMs and EULAs are not.